¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X


 

Well two things...

You assume the uBITx will be used in the shack in your response. Probably true for most operating, but if carrying the radio into the field for QRP operations, the last thing you want to drag along is a separate dummy load and/ or SWR meter... but that is where you most need it... for temporary "on the spot" antennas. Any sort of semi accurate SWR calculator is better than nothing.

Slowing down processing by additional code. Yes I'm extremely aware of this problem hence the my posts on timing. An outboard I2C A/D removes a lot of this load because 1) we are already using the I2C library for other functions in the radio, and 2) the update frequency requirements once off the original Arduino are much lower.


Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC
Staunton, Illinois

Owner ¨C Operator
Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ
Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.
Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com
Like us on Facebook!

Moderator ¨C North American QRO Group at Groups.IO.

email: bill@...

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Sheldon
Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2018 10:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X

I somewhat agree with Tim on this, but will go out on a limb, risk getting flamed and say I don't think a reverse power measurement in firmware is really necessary.

In my opinion, two absolutely necessary pieces of test equipment that should be in EVERY ham's shack are a good 50 ohm dummy load of sufficient power rating to handle all the transmitting equipment that ham has and a GOOD SWR bridge or better still an accurate watt meter that can measure forward & reverse power up to the limit of the transmitting equipment in the shack. The rig's firmware should not be tasked with this especially since the limited NANO is being used as a microcontroller.

The supplied NANO is already close to being severely overworked by all the different available firmware and adding this kind of stuff risks ruining the CW and Digital handling capability of what's available now.
I'm already seeing complaints of "This won't work or that won't work in so-and-so's version of software" regarding a number of things on this group. Adding more bells and whistles to existing software for the NANO will just tend to make this worse.

Jim Sheldon, W0EB

------ Original Message ------
From: "Tim Gorman" <tgorman2@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 5/6/2018 9:43:08 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X

Jerry,

What is the goal here? Is a wattmeter function really needed inside the
ubitx? Or would it be better as an external attachment that can be used
with other equipment?

For me, measurement of the reverse power is the primary measurement
needed inside the ubitx. It is useful for adjusting an external tuner
and for deciding if the ubitx is at risk from a bad load. I am using
the simple circuit at the nd6t site to get the reverse power
measurement. Right now I am using an external analog meter but I have
an adafruit ADS1015 that I am going to use when I get my ubitx working
again. I am using a little 4x4 breadboard to make an I2C bus expander
and the ADS1015 will feed into this along with the I2C lcd.

Coding for this is extremely simple. You don't even have to convert to
volts. Just display the reading from the ads1015. As it goes down you
know the reverse power is going down. If you want to do it with an
analog pin on the nano you can do that too.

Just my 2cents. FWIW.

On Sat, 05 May 2018 15:52:36 -0700
"Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io" <jgaffke@...> wrote:

Kees,

Consensus on the EMRFD yahoo group was that the ebay AD8307's worked
fine:

Some posts there are guessing that when boards get autostuffed from
reels there are often a few parts remaining at the end of the reel,
and the ebay sellers make the remnants available cheaply. Though if
that were truly the case, I'd expect more parts to get sold at 95% off
list price like that.

Diz already has a Stockton/TandemMatch kit at what I think is a
reasonable $12 plus shipping:
Shipping probably has to be
more than $0.70 because of the toroids. Uses 1n5711 schottky diode
detectors.

I mentioned here that I was planning to substitute a couple AD8307's
but Arv convinced me to first try biasing the 1n5711's to make them
more sensitive. /g/BITX20/message/47628
You probably already saw that, it's in this same thread.

I wrote Nano code for the Tandem Match to display forward and reverse
power in Watts, also SWR. but it's also a major rewrite of all the
uBitx code and I got lost in the weeds fiddling with other stuff for a
few weeks. I'll try to get my code going in the next few days. The
AD8307's would give more dynamic range, but I think the 1n5711's with
bias will be plenty polite. Displaying Watts and SWR from the AD8307's
linear-in-dB output would be slightly more difficult on our
computationally challenged Nano. I'm planning to use A6 and A7 for
the bridge, move the paddle to digital pins D0 and
D1 (which are currently unused except when downloading firmware).

Anybody worried about smoking their expensive RD16HHF1 FET's could use
the reflected power reading to shut down the transmitter when
their EFHW antenna falls to the ground in the wind. ;-)

Jerry, KE7ER

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 01:30 pm, Kees T wrote:


I just uploaded the current AGC and Click kit requests. This list
is to help me asses demand so I can have the correct sets of parts
ready. There does not appear to be much demand for boards only,
just complete kits.

I'll post prices later, when I receive the boards and some testing
is done.

I was looking into Don's ND6T Polite Antenna Tuner, but there does
not appear to be much interest and using it effectively may be a
problem, so it's out. I did receive a request for a "Power Level
Upgrade" kit but decided against that because there is a whole lot
of testing to be done when you get into RF Amplification.

What may make sense, unless it's already out there as an add-on
upgrade kit, is a Power/SWR capability using a simple Stockton
Bridge and a couple of AD8307's. I'm quite familiar with the bridge
and the AD8307 parts are getting really cheap <$0.50 each. Wonder
if those Chinese parts are usable at QRP specs ? Would need two
analog inputs on whatever microcontroller .......and, of course,
the ever present requirement for *someone* to provide support
firmware.

73 Kees K5BCQ






---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.