I think this was directed at me¡? Yes what I meant by ¡°glitch¡± was that the resources of the Nano are really stretched when you throw in a touch screen. My experimentation with the larger format TFT and touch screen resulted in having to touch the screen multiple times in order to get the ¡°touch¡± to register as an action.? The Nano was not recognizing the touch consistently with the existing library.. so that¡¯s what I meant by ¡°glitch¡±.
?
?
Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ
?
Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC
Staunton, Illinois
?
Owner ¨C Operator
Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ
Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.
Rent it:
Like us on Facebook!
?
Moderator ¨C North American QRO Group at Groups.IO.
Are you saying it was glitchy with the 5", 7", or 2.8" displays and what does "glitchy" mean ?
I would be interested in CW capability too like some of the K3NG code. He even has a "code reader" and lots of message memories good for contesting. Nothing better than a uBITX for CW, DSP just has too much signal latency.