¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I think this was directed at me¡­? Yes what I meant by ¡°glitch¡± was that the resources of the Nano are really stretched when you throw in a touch screen. My experimentation with the larger format TFT and touch screen resulted in having to touch the screen multiple times in order to get the ¡°touch¡± to register as an action.? The Nano was not recognizing the touch consistently with the existing library.. so that¡¯s what I meant by ¡°glitch¡±.

?

?

Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

?

Owner - Operator

Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC

Staunton, Illinois

?

Owner ¨C Operator

Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ

Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.

Rent it:

Like us on Facebook!

?

Moderator ¨C North American QRO Group at Groups.IO.

?

email:? bill@...

?

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kees T
Sent: Friday, May 4, 2018 11:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays

?

Bill,

Are you saying it was glitchy with the 5", 7", or 2.8" displays and what does "glitchy" mean ?

I would be interested in CW capability too like some of the K3NG code. He even has a "code reader" and lots of message memories good for contesting. Nothing better than a uBITX for CW, DSP just has too much signal latency.

73 Kees K5BCQ


Virus-free.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.