This group BitX20 became discombobulated prior to my joining. Upon joining its become difficult and at times frustrating trying to following the different platforms now addressed in this group. I feel each platform should have its own group, e.g. BitX20, BitX40, and uBitX. I have had no problems with my BitX40. Learning about the uBitX problem with toroids which affected delivery time was disheartening but my kit finally arrived after 2 months. Now, I am not concerned with shipping, rather issues concerning functionality of the uBitX before I begin construction and what hardware I need to replace and what software upgrades I need or will enhance my operation of my transceiver. There are no threads, therefore I have to look at every message which is a time waster. I am concerned about the uBitX only at this stage so if these messages, comments, etc. were more compartmentalized I could breeze past those that I need not read. So in general I agree with those that have commented in this thread, that is until the thread is broken. Terry - KB8AMZ Brimfield Twp, OH Linux User#412308, Ubuntu User #34905 OSs: LM18.1, Ubuntu 16.04, Puppy tahrpup64, Raspbian Orgs: PCL70-FOP, NTHS, ALUG, ARRL, PCARS#78, NAQCC#6668, NO-QRP-C, QRP-ARCI#8855 I chair the PCARS CW/QRP SIG and Linux for Hams SIG, second and fifth Tuesday my computer, my opinion On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:
|