开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Bitx40/Raduino - no power out


 

Yup, sounds like a blown Q13.

HFSigs ships with the surface mount version of the 2n3904, which is the mmbt3904.
Max dissipation of 150mW at 25C ambient.
At 12v to the Bitx40,? the quiescent current is dissipating 225mW in q13, and goes up from there
if you feed it over 12v.??A leaded to92 part like the 2n3904 can dissipate 625mW at 25C ambient,
so is a much better choice.? The 2n2222 should work fine too?

If you search for? ? dissipation q13? ?in this forum, I've got a dozen posts warning against over 12v into the Bitx40.?

Replacing R141 with a 1/2W 10 ohm resistor of some sort would also be a good idea.

I'd recommend using an LM2940CT-12? to limit the voltage that the main Bitx40 board sees from your 14v power supply.
If your power supply drops much below 13v, the main Bitx40 will eventually see less than 12v due to the drop across the LM2940CT-12,
but the main board should still work fine if that's a couple volts low.? The LM7812 could be used, but has a higher dropout voltage
and does not protect against a reversed power supply.? The LM2904CT-12 will limit current to something less than an arc welder,
though you could add a 0.5A fuse there.

The supply to the IRF510 should be a direct connection to your power supply through a 3A fuse.
So long as you have a big enough heat sink on the IRF510,?it would be quite happy at 24v.
Reverse power protection is not required since the intrinsic source-to-drain diode of the IRF510
will conduct and blow the fuse.? (You did include the fuse, right?)


On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:13 pm, Vic WA4THR wrote:
OK, more info...VK3YE has a nice video about the exact problem I seem to be experiencing and posted the voltages seen around Q13 on a defective board compared with what should be seen on a working board.

Alas, my board (BITX40v3 2016) has exactly the same situation. Both emitter and base, where they connect to R132 and R133, respectively, read exactly the same: 1.1v, while the collector reads 14v as expected. So I assume that transistor is toast as it was on the board VK3YE was testing. Would that cause the bias to remain high?

OK, now THAT is a problem for me. At my age, between my eyesight and steadiness, I am not sure I can even remove that chip, much less replace it. I may have some switching transistors, like 2N2222 perhaps, around here someplace, but certainly not any surface mount chips. Could that be substituted? The voltages around the next transistor in the chain, Q14, look normal with the expected 0.6v different between emitter and base.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.