¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Cw only


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Not meant to be rude, but it is what it is. And yes a separate cw signal injected instead of a software generated cw keying solution would have been better. The Arduino is not that powerful to handle all that it is required to do. It can come close to some point. But the specifications and options available can only come via hacking and extending what is basically there.

?

Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens WB4AEG via Groups.Io
Verzonden: 21 December, 2017 18:50
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [BITX20] Cw only

?

Not very helpful....But tks anyway...

-----Original Message-----
From: ron van doremalen (PA3FAT) <ronvandoremalen@...>
To: BITX20 <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Dec 21, 2017 12:47 pm
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Cw only

it¡¯s a 100$ radio, think some limitations are to be expected.

?

Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens WB4AEG via Groups.Io
Verzonden: 21 December, 2017 18:39
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: [BITX20] Cw only

?

?I work only CW and reading what U guy's are saying, this may not be the rig for me. A good internal keyer is a must and with only one IF BW, this would not serve me well. I could add a good keyer module and a variable bandpass audio filter.....but, then the price as increased quite bit....

Any serious CW ops using this rig?? Hal/WB4AEG

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.