Re: sBitx v3 - next final MOSFET killed
开云体育On this subject…. As a person who designs and sells inexpensive electronics… one learns very quickly that your designs must be robust and forgiving… or they break easily and end up relegated to a junk pile.? So, a PA must be able to tolerate mistakes without failing (with an open or shorted antenna), without over-heating, and be inexpensive.? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Bales via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2025 7:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] sBitx v3 - next final MOSFET killed ? It's been mentioned before, repeatedly. I agree. I would gladly pay the extra $5 it would cost to go with rd16hhf mosfets. You can have a SOLID 20 watts up into 10m, and not worry about blowing one if you look at it the wrong way.? ? ? ? ? ? ? -------- Original message -------- From: "Gerald Sherman via groups.io" <ve4gks@...> Date: 4/13/25 7:50 PM (GMT-05:00) Subject: Re: [BITX20] sBitx v3 - next final MOSFET killed ? I would rather pay a little more for a better output transistor than save a dollar or two on the cost.? Perhaps HFS could take note of this. Gerry On 2025-04-13 21:15, Michael Bales via groups.io wrote:
|
K9HZ