开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Production zBitx #zbitx


 

开云体育

I was thinking, what would really be ideal for SOTA. ?I’ve gone hiking a couple of times with the sbitx. ?Together with the antenna and batteries (a couple of old laptop batteries and an adapter I made for them), it barely fits in my backpack, not leaving enough space for a small laptop (which I don’t necessarily need anyway); but I did manage to squeeze in the external 7” touchscreen last time. ?That and a tiny Bluetooth keyboard made it work well to have wsjt-x and sbitx at the same time. ?But… what if it was smaller? ?I also worry a little about fragility; the encoders could get bumped too hard, or the touchscreen. ?(Which I could probably mitigate by designing a good case for it.) ?So I wonder if the zbitx could end up being smaller just because some of the analog RF stuff is separated from the audio board. ?I think the smallest-possible radio with similar capabilities as the sbitx might be a thing to work on. ?There are smaller touchscreens, like 4” with a suitable resolution (same or higher), and I’ve seen a case to put the pi and the screen into a box around the size of any other rpi4 case (with not enough space for a radio, though). ?I think I can eventually come up with a way to have a remote UI to run on a tablet, phone or small laptop, with the pi acting as a wifi access point, so that the modems still run on the sbitx and the display is still useful, but without having to cram everything onto that display. ?Maybe a pi zero would be good enough. ?(Not that the rpi is the only choice. ?There are so many. ?What about a mango pi, riscv? ?I think eventually we will see something like that with the proper risc-v vector extension, and maybe that will be useful for sdr. ?I will be looking forward to try writing some algorithm that makes good use of it some day.) ?A smaller box like that might be a pretty good SOTA setup. ?Otherwise there are things like the Lab599, but it looks like it doesn’t do as much as the sbitx does. ?(I’d need the usual audio/cat control setup for digital modes, if I can’t run arbitrary apps right on the radio.) ? But it has a reputation for being a really excellent receiver.?

If you can make the sbitx even smaller, and still a bit more-than-QRP like it already is, it would be even more unique.

Best-in-class power efficiency on the finals could make it possible to use a smaller heatsink. ?Try to optimize performance, even if the cost goes up a little because of that. ?Then the batteries would last longer too.

I think I’m fine with using external batteries, because these old laptop batteries work so well, and I’m very happy to have multi-purpose batteries rather than something custom that is not meant for any other purpose.

I have no experience with an ATU yet, and I’m doing ok with trying to achieve actual resonance, so far. ?At least the efhw has a built-in tuner, that helps a lot. ?But I also haven’t been on 80 or 160m yet, because of that. ?So whatever. ?If it adds too much bulk, it’s better to omit it, I guess.

On Sep 15, 2024, at 2:10?PM, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:

It is an odd thing though, the Elecraft KH1 is a CW only radio, selling for 600 USD. Not really, if you add all the essentials, it stacks upto 1000 USD. Yet, they sell about 3000 radios per month. Radioddity sells the Xeigus in even higher numbers.
On the other hand, QRP Labs or HF signals builds open, hackable radios at about 1/5th the price. Yet, they are an acquired taste, to put it mildly.
Some may say that those are complete radios, and these are kits or thst they are not fully functional.
Neither is true, the QMX fully assembled retaila for 220 USD, with the kitchen sink.
The basic function of an sbitx (ssb/cw) is far more stable and superior to the G90. Sure, maybe the FT8 logging doesnt work as expectdd, but the G90 doesnt have it at all!
I guess, this is the nature of open radios and will remain so. Pretty much like Linux.
- f


On Sun, Sep 15, 2024, 1:55 PM IU0KVG via <vincenzo.praturlon=[email protected]> wrote:
I think the crowdfund could be the best way to check demand (for the assembled units).
Set up a goal of 20,000$ (200$? * 100) and see what happens.?
If the goal is not reached the money gets back, no harm to anyone.



Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.