Ashhar Farhan
rahul,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
do go ahead with the schematics. i have no 'property claims' on the design. i am right now doing a bit of upgrading of the design myself. i ill probably share this with the group as soon as i have made some progress. this time around, i am make a rig for my personal use. hence, i am expending more effort on this piece as well as slightly higher cost. my main areas of imporvment are the following: 1) high amount of shielding between stages especialy the oscillators and the filters. 2) i am using FET based VFO for lower oscillator phase noise, tuning it with a bank of four 1N4001 diodes with a 10 turn potentiometer for good slow motion drive. 3) digital binary counter for low counter noise (thanks hans! ur site is a treasure). 4) the RF front-end mixer changed to doubly balanced configuration (one more coil to wind). 5) the detector/modulator connections are reversed as discussed previously in the group. 6) reworked the entire audio from detector onwards. the new audio pre-amp is based on w7el design of a common base stage directly coupled to a common emiiter stage. both the stages decoupled by an active decoupler. the audio amp, though not done yet, will be a class-A amplifier with low distortion (instead of the LM386). 7) two IRF510s in push-pull to deliver 10 watts pep (The legal limit for qrp). 8) switching for 7MHz/14Mhz bands, making it a dual-band transceiver. the low-sensitivity that some have complained about, according to my analysis, is due to the mismatch between the detector and the audio pre-amp. hence the rework on the audio. as an aside, are planning to attend the hamconvention in bangalore in october? if you are, we might have an eyeball. - farhan On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Rahul Srivastava wrote:
Dear Farhan, |