That makes a lot of sense.? So the TX calibration is required if it
is necessary to change the finals, correct???
Does that hold up over a normal temperature range?? I don't mean a
full commercial temperature range ... just what might be expected
during typical usage.
Thanks again es 73,
Dave?? AB7E
On 6/15/2023 10:48 PM, Ashhar Farhan
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dave,
This is the reason why we have this painful tx
calibration routine to level the output. The device variations
are prettt wide.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 8:26 AM
stone_ridge_road <
AB7Echo@...>
wrote:
Yes, they do apply in analog use.? They aren't directly
applicable, but they represent the ability of the device to
change voltage level.? A slow switch is going to have a low
Ft.? The IRF510 is literally twice as fast a switch as the
IRZ24N ... at least at their recommended bias conditions.
I worked in the discrete semiconductor industry (engineer,
then business manager) for over 30 years.? Saturation
certainly affects the turn on delay (how hard are you
driving it to put it into saturation) and turn off delay
(how hard was it saturated), but it doesn't significantly
affect the rise and fall times as the device traverses the
linear region.
Besides, I was actually asking more about the effect of
possible variations from batch to batch.? The listed specs
only give typicals ... and trust me, as an ex-producer of
semiconductors I know that variations can be significant.
Dave?? AB7E
On 6/15/2023 3:54 PM, ajparent1/kb1gmx wrote:
Dave,
Ton and Toff do not apply in analog use.? Those are
saturated switch numbers.
Unlike bipolar MOSFETs do not exhibit FT (Frequency where
gain goes to 1)..
They sorta do but the mechanism is different.
For example I've used IRF510s at 70mhz and they are real
good at 50mhz.
I see no reason the IRFz24 would be different save for the
input C is greater
so the matching is more critical as you go up in
frequency.
--
Allison
------------------
Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit
bucket.