¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHave a look at these two notes.? An easy comparison of the K4 at $7K vs the T41¡ not completely 1:1 but close enough¡. ? From Al¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡. I just tried my rig with the Ver53.12 I sent you for frequency accuracy. I am using the TXCO and waited about 30 minutes to let everything warm up.
I would suggest you check the calibration of your T41 with WWV, if you can, using the SAM AM detection mode. ? And this for the K4 from Jim N8OQ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡. ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of James DeYoung - N8OQ via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 6:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Elecraft-K4] K4 On FMT ? This afternoon while it snowed I did 2 minute sampling of each of the Bodnar GPSDO carrier located at 7.05000 MHz, CHU 7.850000 and CHU 3.330000 MHz. ? The K4 frequency on the display was positioned to put the each carrier at +2 KHz near the middle of the receive passband.? WSJT-X FreqCal was used to make the measurements for two minutes sampling (Measured - K4 Tuned display) to the nearest 0.001 Hz.? The summary stats follow. ? ? The spec for the K4 is 0.1 PPM using just the internal TCXO.? So all three of these checks show better than the spec.? There are still small state changes in the data but within the K4 spec. My K4 was actively using the 10-MHz input, Menu: Ext Ref. Lock.? ?Somewhere I read, but couldn't find the note today, was that a 10-MHz external input was not expected to bring huge improvements in frequency accuracy/stabiliity over the internal TCXO. ? Jim (N8OQ) |