Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- AAHistoryLovers
- Messages
Search
Re: Early women AA members
Hi Bob: I believe her name was "Irma Livoni" during her time around AA. I always think it is important to recognize the fact that the ONLY things we know about her AA experience in Los Angeles, is that there's a letter of the group "asking her" to come before them to explain herself, and asking her not to attend meetings until she did so. Famously Sybil Corwin (and 5-other last names) would talk at meetings about her treatment in terms of (a) early women's experience with the male dominated fellowship, and (b) Sybil herself had a version of "whatever happened" to Irma, that so far can not be proved with "independent sources." This controversy was also "pre-Tradition" when the fellowship as a whole was struggling with stuff like "membership committees" and what a member's "rights" were. some groups for instance held a member LOST membership by getting caught or admitting drinking again. Others didn't. The fellowship was still in its "explosive growth" period when a lot of this nonsense was going on....The Traditions really reigned in the groups....Thanks for posting!!
|
Writing The Big Book Discrepancy
Im loving the book. Hvnt got to far yet but it didnt take long till I hit a big discrepancy. On page 27 William wrote their were no Cleveland members in Oct of 1937 but our history clearly shows there were Cleveland members starting in 1936. ?Jane Sturdevant came in early 1937 is just one example. The Amos list shows 5 Cleveland members sober. Also in the forward to the 2nd edition it states a small group had started at Cleveland in 1937. ? I wonder why he wrote that?
-- Eugene Lane Redondo Bch |
Re: Fifth Step
Thanks Jim My earliest Red Book is 48' and have the McElrath book didn't see a mention of fifth step Question was does this practice of no AA member still practiced in the MidWest. On west coast sponsor urged to hear the Fifth Step John -----Original Message----- |
Re: Fifth Step
Hello. In the days when the Little Red Book was written and edited between 1946 and 1967 (not sure what year edition you are referring to) many changes were made. In 1946 the lack of large numbers of recovered?alcoholics with long-term sobriety probably contributed to this advice to go outside of AA. The BB itself does not suggest someone from AA. A great book is "The Story Behind The Little Red Book...The Evolution of a Twelve Step Classic" by Damian McElrath is a good book for reference. jim On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:25 PM John Schram <lasenby327@...> wrote: I was reading the Coll-Webb Little Red Book tonight for a step study Was it common practice in Akron, Cleveland or Mid West not to do a Fifth Step with a spiritual advisor or sponsor Page 83 states "When the right time arrives, arrange and interview with anyone outside of AA Thanks for any info on this? |
Fifth Step
I was reading the Coll-Webb Little Red Book tonight for a step study Was it common practice in Akron, Cleveland or Mid West not to do a Fifth Step with a spiritual advisor or sponsor Page 83 states "When the right time arrives, arrange and interview with anyone outside of AA Thanks for any info on this?
|
Early women AA members
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýDear AA history friends, ? The attached article provides a very nice overall view of early women in AA . ? About Irma Livora: ?I have read several versions about Irma¡¯s life after receiving this 1941 letter; most of them claimed she either died of alcoholism or committed suicide. NOT TRUE! Irma lived for 33 more years. She died, August 24, 1974 at 67 years old. Her name, after several marriages, was ?Irma Edna Craig. ? ? Bob? S ??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -- Bob S Women in Alcoholics Anonymous.pdf
Women in Alcoholics Anonymous.pdf
Irma Livora's Death Certificate.pdf
Irma Livora's Death Certificate.pdf
|
Drafts of "Bill's Story"
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýGene, Yes, I see what you mean! However, I have attached the same from ¡°SILKWORTH¡± ?and the numbers are connected. Bob S ? ** ? ? ? Ty for the reply Bob but that isnt what Im refering to. ?Can someone verify that the following lines are missing.? 235-246, 365-385, 390-428, 582-611, 659-679, 718-752, 756-784, 972-1008, 1070-1092, 1144-1172.... these lines are all missing from the pdf that is downloaded to my phone.? If just a couple lines were missing no big deal. ?But for me huge chunks are missing. Is anyone else having this issue? Thanks Gene -- Bob S |
Re: Drafts of "Bill's Story"
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýTy for the reply Bob but that isnt what Im refering to. ?Can someone verify that the following lines are missing.? 235-246, 365-385, 390-428, 582-611, 659-679, 718-752, 756-784, 972-1008, 1070-1092, 1144-1172.... these lines are all missing from the pdf that is downloaded to my phone.? If just a couple lines were missing no big deal. ?But for me huge chunks are missing. Is anyone else having this issue? Thanks Gene On May 2, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Bob S <rstonebraker212@...> wrote:
|
Re: Drafts of "Bill's Story"
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýGene asked whether the first draft of Bill¡¯s Story was corrupt because of missing parts. A partial answer could be found between numbers 864 and 867. In very small and faded print is written: ¡°Two line numbers are skipped in the typewritten manuscript.¡± This might be true for the other missing sections of this draft. ? Bob S. ? ****c ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2020 1:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AAHistoryLovers] Drafts of "Bill's Story" ? The first attached Bills storey appears to ?have missing sections. ?Is the file corrupt or is it me. ?Is there another place online I download it from or read it
-- Bob S |
Re: Drafts of "Bill's Story"
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe first attached Bills storey appears to ?have missing sections. ?Is the file corrupt or is it me. ?Is there another place online I download it from or read it On Apr 19, 2020, at 1:03 AM, Bob S <rstonebraker212@...> wrote:
|
Re: Kicked out of Los Angeles AA!
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI dont know if this photo is the original Letter. I would actually doubt it. ?This is the one on display at the archive a friend sent me. ?Its probably a copy like was mentioned in the article. ?But Morts spelling has intriged me. ?I assume it right on the letter and people assume its spelled the way its pronounced. ?I did. ?Bob you are awesome ty so much for all of your work and productions. ?You and Nancy O have contributed so much to accurately save out history. Tytyty Gene On May 1, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Bob S <rstonebraker212@...> wrote:
|
Re: Kicked out of Los Angeles AA!
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks for this photo of the original letter, also, for noticing the different spelling of Mortimer. Also, I understand the font of the copy I sent was not available in 1941. Thanks for this copy of the original I will save this for my archive records! ? Bob S * From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2020 2:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AAHistoryLovers] Kicked out of Los Angeles AA! ? Thanks for posting that ive been wantting to read it. ?Here is a picture of the letter on display at the Los Angeles Archives. Notice how Morts name is spelled. Not Mortimer like in your picture. ?Ive always wondered why the discrepency. I would think the one at the archives where the event happened would be the correct spelling.?
-- Bob S |
Re: Kicked out of Los Angeles AA!
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks for posting that ive been wantting to read it. ?Here is a picture of the letter on display at the Los Angeles Archives. Notice how Morts name is spelled. Not Mortimer like in your picture. ?Ive always wondered why the discrepency. I would think the one at the archives where the event happened would be the correct spelling.?
|
Kicked out of Los Angeles AA!
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMany of us have read this story of how Irma Livoni was presented with the following letter. If you haven¡¯t, I think you will find the attached article of great historic value, especially ?concerning Tradition Three. ? ? ? I have read several versions about Irma¡¯s life after receiving this 1941 letter; most of them claimed she either died of alcoholism or committed suicide. NOT TRUE! Irma lived for 33 more years. She died, August 26, 1974. The author of this attached article has presented for us a well-researched bio if her life; yes it is long, but worth the candle, so to speak. ? Bob? S ??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -- Bob S |
Re: Drafts of "Bill's Story"
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý389-412 and some in the 200s and some between 700s to 800s. You get the point. ?Is it my phone or is the file corrupt somehow.? Eugene Lane On Apr 19, 2020, at 1:03 AM, Bob S <rstonebraker212@...> wrote:
|
Re: Drafts of "Bill's Story"
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi Bob thanks for posting. ?Im finding in Bills storey with the numbered lines that are lines missing. ?It goes from 389? On Apr 19, 2020, at 1:03 AM, Bob S <rstonebraker212@...> wrote:
|
Re: Bill Wilson Army career
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAny ideas which guns Bill's CAC unit shot? I was branch Artillery during my stint, and we were told at Artillery School that the CAC had the larger Arty pieces but I don't remember them telling us what the dividing line was. The primary piece used by the U.S. in WWI was the 75mm. Tommy H On 4/26/20 21:10, Jonathan Stewart via
groups.io wrote:
|
Re: Bill Wilson Army career
What it says in Bill W. by Thomsen, is that? 1.- His mother missed his wedding on January 24, 1918 because of "a sudden attack of flu." The next day they went to visit her. and then after sailing over to England... 2.-? "The Sixty-sixth?C-C.C. disembarked at Southampton but instead of being transhipped for France immediately. they were stationed outside Winchester, where a minor epidemic in the camp was to delay them even longer....Bill set off alone one afternoon to visit Winchester and its?ancient cathedral." jim On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 5:37 PM Gene <califxr650l@...> wrote:
|
Re: Bill Wilson Army career
66th Coast Artillery (AA) Regiment
Constituted 1918 as 66th Arty, CAC, and organized at Ft. Adams 3-1-18 from personnel in CD
Narragansett Bay. Departed Ft. Adams 7-18-18 and sailed from the Boston POE later in the month.
Regiment (less Btry C) arrived in Le Havre 8-10-18. Btry C arrived Cherbourg 8-19-18. Assigned to
Services of Supply and moved to Limoges (Haute-Vienne) where the 1st Bn remained until the Armistice. The 2nd and 3rd Bns moved to La Courtine (Crouse) on 11-6-18 and 11-10-18 respectively
where they also remained until the Armistice. The regiment remained in France until shipped back to
the U.S. 3-8-19 and demobilized at Cp. Upton, NY, 3-20-19. Can't see anything on Bill Wilson in this,?The history of Battery E, 66th Artillery, CAC, but there is a section on the Spanish Flu?
On Sunday, 26 April 2020, 23:37:20 BST, Gene <califxr650l@...> wrote:
I think he enlisted in the Coastal Artillery in 1917 not 1971 hahaha!!? I also remember reading there was some delays reaching the war due to flu. Not him personally....
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bob S <rstonebraker212@...>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 8:12 AM To: AA History Lovers Group <[email protected]> Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Bill Wilson Army career ?
Gerry C asked: May I piggyback on this with a broader question....how long was Bill in the Army, what unit and what rank did he hold when he detached again? Thank you. ** ? Bill was called to service late 1971 (PIO , p. 407) and released during spring of 1919 (PIO p. 61), so approximately a year and a half. ? He was a second Lieutenant (PIO ?p. 54) at first, and I have found no evidence that a promotion followed.? ? Bob S ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -- Bob S |
Re: Bill Wilson Army career
66th C.A.C. He was in coastal artillery Bill W. Thomsen On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 12:56 Bob S <rstonebraker212@...> wrote:
|