开云体育

Sieg C3 vs SC3


 

What is a "digital motor"? As far as I'm aware, here in Australia the C3P has a 350w brushed motor and the SC3 has a 500w brushless motor. I have not heard of anyone having to replace the brushless motor but on YouTube there are many transplanting different motors to replace the 350w one which has "smoked"


 

I'm thinking that's referring to a BLDC - brushless DC motor.

The Sieg circuitry looks like it's based on a reference design for the Atmel Encoder BLDC:



I think they used a different 8 bit uC but basically the same idea.

On 12/18/2024 9:08 PM, Old Boilermaker via groups.io wrote:
What is a "digital motor"? As far as I'm aware, here in Australia the C3P has a 350w brushed motor and the SC3 has a 500w brushless motor. I have not heard of anyone having to replace the brushless motor but on YouTube there are many transplanting different motors to replace the 350w one which has "smoked"





 

I have purchased all but one time the longest.
?
The reason is very simple space. In retirement you could find a location may not have room for bigger lathes? so decide on a? 8" x 14" and can do milling too. It will fit in a 36" Aumawal or weight like on a install field pickup ?/boat ?/airplane ? maybe for class room ??
?
Dave?


 

开云体育

Length can also be reclamed by using a collet

Best regards
David

On 16 Dec 2024, at 07:30, Miket_NYC via groups.io <mctaglieri@...> wrote:

?

"For ME, I would absolutely go with the longer bed.? That distance can gets used up pretty fast with a chuck in the headstock, work piece, drill, and Jacobs chuck in the tail stock.? I also like a longer bed so I can move the tailstock further out of my way when not using it."

I agree completely, but I worked for years (and made several large projects), with a Harbor Freight 7x10, and there are ways to get around bed-length problems. (And these ways are worth knowing about no matter how big your lathe is). A drill in the tailstock doesn't HAVE to be in a chuck. You can drill a pilot hole with a small drill in the chuck, then hold your big drill on the tailstock center with a lathe dog on the drill shaft to keep it from turning. (And that center can be a homemade short one that hardly sticks out, not the giant centers you buy). When drilling from the tail stock, you can also shorten drills by simply sawing off the shaft -- they aren't hardened.

Also, many things held in a chuck can instead be held on the faceplate. Most people used the faceplate for holding odd-shaped things that won't fit in the chuck, but if you're bed-challenged, you can also use it to save the ~2" of bed length that a chuck uses up.

Eventually I bought a longer bed for my 7x10 from little machine shop, but I don't regret my original purchase of the short bed. It helped develop my ingenuity.

Mike Taglieri


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Charles Kinzer via <ckinzer=[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Dec 15, 2024, 6:45?PM
Subject: Re: [7x12MiniLathe] Sieg C3 vs SC3
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>


I'm not completely expert in the differences and just rambling from memory.

But first, I don't think anybody can say if lathe X is better than lathe Y - for YOU.

It is my understanding that the SC3 has a better motor arrangement and also a longer bed (7x16 instead of 7x14).

For ME, I would absolutely go with the longer bed.? That distance can gets used up pretty fast with a chuck in the headstock, work piece, drill, and Jacobs chuck in the tail stock.? I also like a longer bed so I can move the tailstock further out of my way when not using it.

But plenty are fine with the various shorter bed models.

Another thing I think about is the cost of the tooling.? And how I would feel paying the same money for tooling (chucks, better tool post, and on and on) for the lathe I didn't really want versus the lathe I really did want.? So, I suggest it is often best to go for the most machine you reasonably can unless cost is absolutely a major factor.

That would also mean looking at options other than C3 versus SC3 and perhaps other lathes.

Charles E. "Chuck" Kinzer

On Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 02:40:45 PM PST, Old Boilermaker via <alned03=[email protected]> wrote:


Contemplating buying a mini lathe for home use. Is it worth spending the extra money to buy a SC3 as opposed to a C3 ?.


 

Using a collet only helps in SOME cases.? The part would usually have to be round and small enough diameter to fit the collet.? Therefore, as a solution to the length problem, the value of collets is limited.? A longer bed is the only universal solution for a too short bed.

Charels E. "Chuck" Kinzer

On Thursday, January 2, 2025 at 11:36:38 AM PST, David Wiseman <david@...> wrote:


Length can also be reclamed by using a collet

Best regards
David

On 16 Dec 2024, at 07:30, Miket_NYC via groups.io <mctaglieri@...> wrote:

?

"For ME, I would absolutely go with the longer bed.? That distance can gets used up pretty fast with a chuck in the headstock, work piece, drill, and Jacobs chuck in the tail stock.? I also like a longer bed so I can move the tailstock further out of my way when not using it."

I agree completely, but I worked for years (and made several large projects), with a Harbor Freight 7x10, and there are ways to get around bed-length problems. (And these ways are worth knowing about no matter how big your lathe is). A drill in the tailstock doesn't HAVE to be in a chuck. You can drill a pilot hole with a small drill in the chuck, then hold your big drill on the tailstock center with a lathe dog on the drill shaft to keep it from turning. (And that center can be a homemade short one that hardly sticks out, not the giant centers you buy). When drilling from the tail stock, you can also shorten drills by simply sawing off the shaft -- they aren't hardened.

Also, many things held in a chuck can instead be held on the faceplate. Most people used the faceplate for holding odd-shaped things that won't fit in the chuck, but if you're bed-challenged, you can also use it to save the ~2" of bed length that a chuck uses up.

Eventually I bought a longer bed for my 7x10 from little machine shop, but I don't regret my original purchase of the short bed. It helped develop my ingenuity.

Mike Taglieri


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Charles Kinzer via <ckinzer=[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Dec 15, 2024, 6:45?PM
Subject: Re: [7x12MiniLathe] Sieg C3 vs SC3
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>


I'm not completely expert in the differences and just rambling from memory.

But first, I don't think anybody can say if lathe X is better than lathe Y - for YOU.

It is my understanding that the SC3 has a better motor arrangement and also a longer bed (7x16 instead of 7x14).

For ME, I would absolutely go with the longer bed.? That distance can gets used up pretty fast with a chuck in the headstock, work piece, drill, and Jacobs chuck in the tail stock.? I also like a longer bed so I can move the tailstock further out of my way when not using it.

But plenty are fine with the various shorter bed models.

Another thing I think about is the cost of the tooling.? And how I would feel paying the same money for tooling (chucks, better tool post, and on and on) for the lathe I didn't really want versus the lathe I really did want.? So, I suggest it is often best to go for the most machine you reasonably can unless cost is absolutely a major factor.

That would also mean looking at options other than C3 versus SC3 and perhaps other lathes.

Charles E. "Chuck" Kinzer

On Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 02:40:45 PM PST, Old Boilermaker via <alned03=[email protected]> wrote:


Contemplating buying a mini lathe for home use. Is it worth spending the extra money to buy a SC3 as opposed to a C3 ?.


 

开云体育

Hi everyone. It may help to use a faceplate.

?

Sometimes we ?automatically think of 3 jaw chuck and don’t consider alternatives.

?

???????????? Ellis

?

?

?

Using a collet only helps in SOME cases.? The part would usually have to be round and small enough diameter to fit the collet.? Therefore, as a solution to the length problem, the value of collets is limited.? A longer bed is the only universal solution for a too short bed.

?

?

?

Length can also be reclamed by using a collet


 

"It may help to use a faceplate. Sometimes we ?automatically think of 3 jaw chuck and don’t consider alternatives."
?
While the latter statement is true, in situations where the work is too long for the lathe's bed, a faceplate mounting is unlikely to help.? (Example: Working a 1-inch diameter x 8 inch long bar.)
?
If buying one of our hobby lathes, get the longest bed you can afford.
?
Kurt Laughlin


 

开云体育

Hi Kurt, sorry for the late reply. On my hobby lathe, I can easily fit a 25 dia by 200 mm bar. Between centres, I can fit a 300 mm long bar.

?

The point I was making, that whatever lathe you have, there is bound to be an item too long (Murphy’s law).

?

We need to think of ways around the problem, some my suggestions are –

Use a faceplate

Between centres

Divide the item in 2 and screw together.

If it can go though the headstock spindle, machine section by section, then turn end for end and continue

Re-design the item to remove the problem

?

There are probably other solutions I have not needed to use – yet !!!

?

HTH

??????????? Ellis

?

?

?

"It may help to use a faceplate. Sometimes we ?automatically think of 3 jaw chuck and don’t consider alternatives."

?

While the latter statement is true, in situations where the work is too long for the lathe's bed, a faceplate mounting is unlikely to help.? (Example: Working a 1-inch diameter x 8 inch long bar.)

?

If buying one of our hobby lathes, get the longest bed you can afford.

?

Kurt Laughlin


 

All good advice! Think before you act!? ?Bill


On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 6:44?AM Ellis Cory via <ellis103=[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Kurt, sorry for the late reply. On my hobby lathe, I can easily fit a 25 dia by 200 mm bar. Between centres, I can fit a 300 mm long bar.

?

The point I was making, that whatever lathe you have, there is bound to be an item too long (Murphy’s law).

?

We need to think of ways around the problem, some my suggestions are –

Use a faceplate

Between centres

Divide the item in 2 and screw together.

If it can go though the headstock spindle, machine section by section, then turn end for end and continue

Re-design the item to remove the problem

?

There are probably other solutions I have not needed to use – yet !!!

?

HTH

??????????? Ellis

?

?

?

"It may help to use a faceplate. Sometimes we ?automatically think of 3 jaw chuck and don’t consider alternatives."

?

While the latter statement is true, in situations where the work is too long for the lathe's bed, a faceplate mounting is unlikely to help.? (Example: Working a 1-inch diameter x 8 inch long bar.)

?

If buying one of our hobby lathes, get the longest bed you can afford.

?

Kurt Laughlin