Thanks John
animal
On 5/18/24 6:57 PM, BuffaloJohn wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It's not the design, it is the device. A transient pulse
needs to be dissipated. To do that, the MOV becomes a short
and then when the voltage decreases, it can become a high
resistance path again. However, when the conduction time is
beyond a certain amount of energy, heating occurs and the
crystalline structure of the MOV can crack, melt, etc. and the
device has protected it's last time.
I dug up an old circuit of a surge suppressor we fielded:
This has both three and two lead MOVs. It also has
redundancy since there are slight variations in performance of
MOVs. Also, all the combinations of transient possibilities
are protected.
This one is designed to let the MOV shorting out cause the
isolation relay to disengage.
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at
5:09?PM davesmith1800 via <davesmith1=
[email protected]>
wrote:
In
technical terms the Varistor shorts out? (when a voltage
spikes happen) flipping the breaker or burning out the fuse.?
So if not designed right you easly have fire because it gets
very hot.?
Dave?
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 04:58 PM, mike allen wrote:
Surge protectors aren't all equal . They said on
the news just now the
fire was started at one of the surge protectors for a 3D
printer I believe .
--
Buffalo John