Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Yasl
- Messages
Search
Re: Gaming Garage canceled for November
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Nov 13, 2023, at 9:28 AM, Cole Mills <contactcolemills@...> wrote:
|
Re: Gaming Garage canceled for November
Chuck, Some people are crying that they have to spend four straight days with their family. Regards, Cole On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 8:45?AM Joseph Gochinski via <jgochinski=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Gaming Garage canceled for November
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Nov 13, 2023, at 5:23 AM, Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
|
Re: Gaming Garage canceled for November
Have a nice Thanksgiving Chuck, with all you do, you deserve a break in the action!? Enjoy your Turkey Day, Vic.
On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 05:23:58 AM EST, Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
Everyone, I¡¯ve decided to cancel Gaming Garage "Black Friday" edition this month. I¡¯m overwhelmed with all the many things I have going on this month and need to cut back some. My apologies.
We will resume in December and I wish you all a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday. ¡ªChuck T |
Re: Gaming Garage canceled for November
Hope you have a wonderful holiday, as well!! On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 05:23 Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
|
Gaming Garage canceled for November
Everyone, I¡¯ve decided to cancel Gaming Garage "Black Friday" edition this month. I¡¯m overwhelmed with all the many things I have going on this month and need to cut back some. My apologies.
We will resume in December and I wish you all a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday. ¡ªChuck T |
Re: YASL Support Appeal - 2023
Glad to help! Roll low, Vic.? ![]() ![]()
On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 12:17:32 PM EDT, Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
Hi folks - thanks again to those who contributed!? Very much?appreciated! Best, Chuck On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 8:24?AM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury=[email protected]> wrote: Hi Everyone - it's that time of year where I reach out and ask for your financial support to keep the YASL list up and running here on .? The fee is $20/month, which for the features we get, is very reasonable.? I hope you will consider a donation. |
Re: YASL Support Appeal - 2023
Hi folks - thanks again to those who contributed!? Very much?appreciated! Best, Chuck On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 8:24?AM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury=[email protected]> wrote: Hi Everyone - it's that time of year where I reach out and ask for your financial support to keep the YASL list up and running here on .? The fee is $20/month, which for the features we get, is very reasonable.? I hope you will consider a donation. |
Re: Nor'easwter info up
Hey Carl! Was wondering if you could drop me an email at greenmonstergames@...
Wanted to ping you about some stuff Curt |
Re: Hollow Legions and FKAC
All yours. ? ¡ªChuck T On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 10:33?AM Teddy Horan <teddy.horan@...> wrote:
|
Re: Hollow Legions and FKAC
Hey Chuck. You still got the Hollow Legions? On Sat, Oct 14, 2023, 8:26 AM Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
|
Re: Pushing armor rack through/across minefields
I can see the Russians at least trying to do just that, no problem, just not in ASL, sounds par for the course for a country that bedevils us to this very day...
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 07:24:03 PM EDT, chnogueira via groups.io <chnogueira@...> wrote:
We never shoot a guy for trying. I'm not sure about the Soviets to be honest..................................depends what you are trying. Defecting, the commanders wife......etc.?
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 01:04:14 PM EDT, Tom Coleman <tomcoleman863@...> wrote:
No wreck mine clearing! Had to ask thanks?for answering
Thank you?Chuck!
TC
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of aslbunker@... via groups.io <ASLBunker@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 9:22 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [yasl] Pushing armor rack through/across minefields ?
Yes indeed but not used for mine clearance.
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 09:15:42 AM EDT, Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
FWIW - you can "Push" the Wreck to have it removed.? See D10.42
10.42 PUSHING: A wreck is removed at the end of the MPh by any
tracked AFV (whose weight is ¡Ý 90% of the wreck¡¯s weight) which remains mobile while expending half of its MP allotment (in addition to any MP cost for entry of the wreck¡¯s hex) in that wreck¡¯s Location solely for that purpose.
|
Re: Tournament scenario lists
Especially after you and your opponent have a loss then it is up to you both to let the tourney director know you are going off list, perfectly fine in later rounds with guys out of the running. Just don't pick the Last Bid or some other monster with just a day left, thinking you'll finish it before the hotel throws you out!
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 07:14:59 PM EDT, chnogueira via groups.io <chnogueira@...> wrote:
Correct Mike. Going off list has always been an option and occasionally, some players do. It has to be agreed upon by both players, but if they wish to do so, off you go.?
On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 12:05:15 AM EDT, mallexen@... via groups.io <mallexen@...> wrote:
Hi Kedge, hope you had fun at ASLOK! And thank you for the player feedback.? And for proselytizing for the NorEaster! While unbalanced scenarios and sharking are a concern, to me the bigger concern is keeping everyone on time.? Especially for the morning rounds.? If a long game is picked for the morning round, that could mess up pairings for the afternoon round. With a smaller tourney like ours, with 5 rounds, that's more problematic than the weeklong affair of ASLOK, which has more time for catchup. As a frequent handler of PIS sheets, guys do occasionally go offlist.? Or perhaps play a Round 1 scenario in Round 4.? I don't think our TD will ever disallow that when it was mutually agreed upon. And I know that is much different than the open format, but it is something. -Mike
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 05:06:12 PM EDT, RLJII via groups.io <wintrymix@...> wrote:
Hi all, I was at ASLOK last week (don't ask...), and talked to several guys about Nor'easter. Something I heard multiple times was guys not wanting to come to tournaments with defined scenario lists. They preferred more open tournaments, like ASLOK and Winter Offensive.? Which got me thinking. Maybe a defined scenario list is not such a great option.? One concern I foresee is the possibility of someone choosing an unbalanced scenario.? Perhaps there is a solution that lies somewhere in the middle. Rather than have defined scenario choices for each round, we specify a pool of scenarios from which players can choose. We could also allow the option of choosing outside of the pool at the TD's discretion.? Thoughts? Kedge |
Re: Tournament scenario lists
Carl speaks the truth, ASLOK style is fine for a full week there but regional tourneys do it right for 3 or 4 days together,? Carl, Chuck and Steve Pleva always have nice lists filled with balanced and fun actions, I'm a big fan of structure, Vic.
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 06:51:09 PM EDT, chnogueira via groups.io <chnogueira@...> wrote:
Picking imbalanced, too-long or short scenarios is a huge problem with the open format. I was never a fan of what happens at ASLOK all the time. A 4-0 guy gets to play a 6-0 guy, shouldn't happen, but does with no timing, or restraints of any kind. I avoid non-programmed list tourneys for the same reason.? Some like the structure, some don't. Attendance was not our Achilles heel this year. Finding a hotel that was not insane was. Ralph finally was able to locate a good spot. He and I checked it out, and we are now good to go. We had 50 guys last year, that is not bad. I went through that debate years ago with the usual suspects. Given only three days of actual tourney, this fits our schedule and our clientele well.? Carl?
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 05:06:12 PM EDT, RLJII via groups.io <wintrymix@...> wrote:
Hi all, I was at ASLOK last week (don't ask...), and talked to several guys about Nor'easter. Something I heard multiple times was guys not wanting to come to tournaments with defined scenario lists. They preferred more open tournaments, like ASLOK and Winter Offensive.? Which got me thinking. Maybe a defined scenario list is not such a great option.? One concern I foresee is the possibility of someone choosing an unbalanced scenario.? Perhaps there is a solution that lies somewhere in the middle. Rather than have defined scenario choices for each round, we specify a pool of scenarios from which players can choose. We could also allow the option of choosing outside of the pool at the TD's discretion.? Thoughts? Kedge |
Re: Pushing armor rack through/across minefields
chnogueira
We never shoot a guy for trying. I'm not sure about the Soviets to be honest..................................depends what you are trying. Defecting, the commanders wife......etc.?
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 01:04:14 PM EDT, Tom Coleman <tomcoleman863@...> wrote:
No wreck mine clearing! Had to ask thanks?for answering
Thank you?Chuck!
TC
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of aslbunker@... via groups.io <ASLBunker@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 9:22 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [yasl] Pushing armor rack through/across minefields ?
Yes indeed but not used for mine clearance.
On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 09:15:42 AM EDT, Chuck Tewksbury <chuck.tewksbury@...> wrote:
FWIW - you can "Push" the Wreck to have it removed.? See D10.42
10.42 PUSHING: A wreck is removed at the end of the MPh by any
tracked AFV (whose weight is ¡Ý 90% of the wreck¡¯s weight) which remains mobile while expending half of its MP allotment (in addition to any MP cost for entry of the wreck¡¯s hex) in that wreck¡¯s Location solely for that purpose.
|
Re: Tournament scenario lists
chnogueira
Hi Other Carl, ? ? ? ? It's mostly a function of the players picking their top three scenarios out of 5 for each round and then choosing a side. The players choose the side they want. If both choose the same side it is resolved by dr with the loser getting the booby prize of the side they didn't want with balance. As mentioned by others previously, if you want to go off list, knock yourself out. However, if the game is unresolved come the start of the next round, you are out of the running for the tournament. If that matters to you, don't go off list. If it doesn't, by all means go off list, enjoy.? Thanks, Carl
On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 12:32:35 PM EDT, carlzog <carlzog@...> wrote:
I've only been to a couple tournaments (and in such a noob capacity that they don't really count as competitive experience), but I've assumed that a curated scenario list is intended to provide some kind of theme and give context to what the competition is testing. Is it about who's best at a particular kind of scenario, a theater of war, a type of victory condition, or an overall versatility of skills? I've also noticed that ASL tournaments don't seem differentiate between whether you play the attacker or defender in any number of rounds -- another difference in skillset (or at least it seems that way to me so far!) |
Re: Tournament scenario lists
chnogueira
Correct Mike. Going off list has always been an option and occasionally, some players do. It has to be agreed upon by both players, but if they wish to do so, off you go.?
On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 12:05:15 AM EDT, mallexen@... via groups.io <mallexen@...> wrote:
Hi Kedge, hope you had fun at ASLOK! And thank you for the player feedback.? And for proselytizing for the NorEaster! While unbalanced scenarios and sharking are a concern, to me the bigger concern is keeping everyone on time.? Especially for the morning rounds.? If a long game is picked for the morning round, that could mess up pairings for the afternoon round. With a smaller tourney like ours, with 5 rounds, that's more problematic than the weeklong affair of ASLOK, which has more time for catchup. As a frequent handler of PIS sheets, guys do occasionally go offlist.? Or perhaps play a Round 1 scenario in Round 4.? I don't think our TD will ever disallow that when it was mutually agreed upon. And I know that is much different than the open format, but it is something. -Mike
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 05:06:12 PM EDT, RLJII via groups.io <wintrymix@...> wrote:
Hi all, I was at ASLOK last week (don't ask...), and talked to several guys about Nor'easter. Something I heard multiple times was guys not wanting to come to tournaments with defined scenario lists. They preferred more open tournaments, like ASLOK and Winter Offensive.? Which got me thinking. Maybe a defined scenario list is not such a great option.? One concern I foresee is the possibility of someone choosing an unbalanced scenario.? Perhaps there is a solution that lies somewhere in the middle. Rather than have defined scenario choices for each round, we specify a pool of scenarios from which players can choose. We could also allow the option of choosing outside of the pool at the TD's discretion.? Thoughts? Kedge |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss