开云体育

I'm trying to understand the calculations that the single patch browser (included with Xplorer) ueses. Looking at XpanderSysEx.h // Single patch data sysex length is 399 bytes // 6 bytes for sysex

You can use a razor blade to carefully work under the cap and pry it up. That is what I do on old OB's. Don't slip though. <xpantastic@...> wrote: -- Patrick

Hi. Is there anyone who knows how to safely open up an Xpander panel switch, i.e. remove the switch cap? /M

Anybody?

Hi, The project will be released as open source one day. For now I don't have time to cleanup things and migrate the history to Github or similar repository, maybe I will be able to work on it in the

Thomas Dial dialtr@... [xpantastic] wrote: One feature I would like - and would pay for - is for random patches to have an option to keyboard track so it's playable and not a one-shot sound. Can

Random patch generator along certain themes (i.e. lead, pad, etc) would be great. Also IIRC the MULTI mode was not supported in the editor as the implmentation (maybe from sys-ex perspective) is

Great news. On a slightly unrelated note, has anyone ever had a shot at writing new firmware to speed up the responsiveness of the controls? Matrix 1000 firmware updates have been amazing at

Yes, I'll second that. it is a very nice patch editor, and the only one which I know of. [xpantastic] <xpantastic@...> wrote:

You did a great hob on this. I remember buying it all those years back and it really opened up the synth to me. Thanks again! ________________________________ Sent: 07 December 2017 11:25 PM To:

Great question! I’m a programmer and would love to work on the project- time permitting of course! Would love to make sure that this awesome project continues to exist.

Hi Greg Is the source code available as well? Thanks xpantastic@...> wrote:

Hi, The Xpander/Matrix-12 editor Xplorer is now free :) You can find the latest version and the license on the website: http://xplorer.programmer.free.fr/?page_id=15

Many thanks Karl! ________________________________ Sent: 03 September 2017 10:32 PM To: xpantastic@... Subject: Re: [xpantastic] Matrix 12 voice fail. Hi , The top voice board is 1 - 6.

Hi , The top voice board is 1 - 6.? The bottom board is?voices 7 - 12.So voice 9 is really voice 3 on the bottom board.This is a common fail. More than likely it's cap C549? a 2.2 uF / 50 VDC

Folks! on Autotune I get a Fail on Voice 9. How can I check which is Voice 9 on the voice boards? inside the Matrix 12 I see 2 identical boards one on top of the other with voices labelled 1-6 on

Oh don't get me wrong, whilst he has obviously added effects and such to that track, a lot of the sounds can be gotten quite easily out of the Xpander. A big key for the 'electric' sounds is playing

deano deanolium@... [xpantastic] wrote: I was going to post to say just this, so thanks for verifying it.

Hi Mondo, Whilst it doesn't check *everything* on the Xpander, the init patch basically has enough to ensure everything is working. On a simple scale, the Xpander has only a couple of sound blocks in

Hello friends out there, It puzzles me, but how can even a considerable indentity in the "init patch" (which is a most simple patch) tell that a synth is technically fully functioning? Like if you