开云体育

I wasn't very clear about my decompiler and what it does, etc, so I'll explain. Example here: http://www.decompiler.org/zol.usub_4BE6.txt [original 6502 code]

Hi John I have an early US version and I managed to get in contact with the software designer *Michel Doidic* but he could not help me with this issue. I have made some hardware changes that *Michel

Hi Tobbe, The Europa upgrade is for your Roland Jupiter 6: http://www.synthcom.com/Europa/europaFaq.html As for your strange (but cool) tuning sounds, I'd call that a feature rather than a bug. ;) I

Thanks for the responses. I just assumed the CV inputs acted as a modulation source (maybe the pedal inputs are good in this regard?). Still, I didn't get the Xpander to do snappy basses. I can't wait

Sorry for intruding but I was wondering what the Europa Upgrade was ? Ever since I upgrade to the latest software ( Which I Found here http://www.synthi.se/oberheim ) I have been having strange sounds

Hi Jeremy, Sorry, I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion there. Thanks for the clarification. Structured assembly language would be very useful. Does your decompiler handle 6809 already? It would

Hi Tony, Nobody's saying it would be easy to develop a new version of the Xpander OS, but it would certainly be much easier if there was a version of the source code to start with. Is your friend

The decompiler is just for figuring out how code works, rather than recompilable C. Yes, it is 'structured' with loops, and no registers, etc. The whole point is to see the program at a higher level,

By >>"committed to the cause", do you mean "prepared to spend money"? A project like this is easily going to take 1 person more than a year, even if they know 6809 assembly very well. For those who

@Kris, If he already supports the 6502 then the 6809 won't take him long to implement (if he hasn't already). @Jeremy, If Tony's friend could be persuaded to divulge the source code, we wouldn't need

Hi, I just go to your website, but unfortunately, you do not seem to support 6809 processors right ? Kris

Tony Cappellini wrote: Hi, I run a decompiler company and my software can reverse-engineer any assembly code into C. http://www.decompiler.org/ I could put your friend's comments into defined labels,

ah ok, I didn't realize noise was just a separate sound source being mixed with VCO1/2. So yea, adding VCO2 -> VCO1 sync would not have the results I'm looking for without the modifications you

If any of you are **really serious** about re-writing the Xpander OS, I think I know someone who has the original source code (you really gotta luv 6809 assembly) and would probably be interested in

Nothing about the OS for now since I do not have an Xpander/Matrix for now ;-) So : I had to build my own toy first ;-) About VCO and noise, I do not understand. When I'm looking at schematics, the

My first goal is to build a 'basic' 6 voices clone. Theorically, after studying the schematic, it seems that hardware support up to 24 voices (4 voices boards) is here. But I don't know if the

please tell me you're trying to re-write the OS as well! I'm adding my wish list again: * VCO 2 -> VCO1 sync (white noise is only available on VCO2. So being able to use VCO2 as the sync master and

I would add here, that even though you can't get "snappy" bass sounds, you can still get "killer" bass sounds with the Xpander. Listen to Nitzer Ebb "Belief" or "Showtime" and you'll hear the magic of

Omar is correct, the oscillators in the Xpander will not respond any more quickly if they are sequenced over CV (Silent Way, hardware sequencer, etc). The reason is that the CV/Gate inputs only accept

Please tell me you're making a 24-voice clone.