开云体育

That's pretty cool.

XEphem should work everywhere - so whatever is needed for that, I'd say. I'm just a consumer/observer, happy that people are working on this!

Apple moving to the new chip may break the executable but not the package manager. Those two things are not related. So your proposing not including any updates to Xephem for OSX?

Am 24.03.2021 um 20:57 schrieb Sarty, Gordon: You mean like this? https://paste.pics/BYYN3 That's the openSUSE rpm version of XEphem running inside a WSL session on Windows 10, X11 forwarding

Mac OSX already has a (nice) .dmg for XEphem, but it will likely be broken when tried with the new chip. (I have abandoned mac for this and other reasons.) I'm on ubuntu which has snap and apt

Why do you want to limit it to Linux platforms? What about Unix platforms like Mac OSX. I have it installed Fedora and OSX 10.14. ... and forgive me for saying this Windows.

Hi all, Appimage, Snap and Flatpak are 3 different concepts with the same goal: to pack a complete application with all dependencies in one package and make it executable on a variety of platforms

Hi, I am not sure what flatpak is and how it works. Will there be any chance of having it in "Appimage"? https://appimage.org/ An "Appimage" is a single file with all libraries and program compress

I still does run on Mac OSX 10.14. I have it on my iMac now.

Ok, just to throw in my two cents... I managed to get xephem to build an run on my Ubuntu Linux box with no problems at all. After a quick re-try, back when this thread started, I failed. Since atm.

Right, I think it's in ports/packages in OpenBSD too. But did it come out of a flatpak? Apparently from looking at

Here in FreeBSD 12.2 amd64 working just great! from ports! on plasma. Eric De La Cruz LugoMerida Yucatan Mexico

Yes, please, a tar.gz. On a quick look flatpak is only for linux. Xephem at least used to run and Apples and the BSDs. https://www.flatpak.org/ "The future of ap[s on Linux"

It is somewhat depressing to see how many people have trouble installing xephem on Ubuntu or other distros.?? I have compiled v. 3.7.7 several times, even though it does install on Arch Linux and

I would encourage us to keep a tar.gz of it also. Is anyone in charge of doing this or are random people pitching in when they can?

I like debs. apt install handles debs ok. The limits of snap are silly but I've worked around them. I don't know what a flatpak is. Gordon

Am Samstag, 6. Februar 2021, 19:11:47 CET schrieb georg180662: After some experiments I'm strongly opposing snap - for ANYTHING, not just xephem: snap can't be used if your home directory is not

Am Mittwoch, 17. M?rz 2021, 19:24:02 CET schrieb Mathias Homann: ok, scratch RHEL7/8 for now, I'd have to package motif for rhel7 first, and rhel 8 is not an option on OBS (yet). On the plus side,

Give me some time, I'm working on making my openSUSE spec file work for fedora 31- and RHEL 7/8. Am 17.03.2021 um 17:47 schrieb Doug Laidlaw:

Thanks for the reply, Gordon. My favorite search engine for RPMs is rpm.pbone.net. It lists no rpms for Fedora after Fedora 7. There is one for OpenSUSE 15.2, but that is usually incompatible. As I