Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Xephem
- Messages
Search
Re: Vernal Equinox -- astrometric vs. apparent?
Change the equinox from 2000 to equinox of date and see what happens.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Bud On 3/21/2011 11:35 AM, Akkana Peck wrote:
Geeky astronomical coordinate question: |
|
Re: Vernal Equinox -- astrometric vs. apparent?
Akkana Peck <yahoo@...> writes:
Geeky astronomical coordinate question ... this is a differenceWhen I packaged the XEphem computation routines so that they could be used by Python programmers, I went ahead and attempted to write up an explanation of how these coordinates differ. My explanation might not be very clear - and might even be wrong if there are points of the science that I misunderstood - but here it is, in case it helps you: -- Brandon Craig Rhodes brandon@... |
|
Vernal Equinox -- astrometric vs. apparent?
Akkana Peck
Geeky astronomical coordinate question:
Yesterday was the Vernal Equinox. The RASC handbook says it happened at 23:21 UT, but I wanted to check that in XEphem. I couldn't figure out how to get it to tell me directly, so I went to the Sky View and right-clicked on the Sun at different times to find out when it crossed 0 declination. That happened four hours after the date the RASC lists, at about 03:15. Most tables list the 23:21 time as the time of the equinox. Subsequent research, and running it on the JPL Horizons simulator seems to indicate this is a difference between astrographic coordinates (used by xephem) and apparent coordinates (RASC and other tables). But none of my references are very clear what the difference is and why they differ so much. The best I've been able to come up with is that apparent coordinates are corrected for the motion of the Earth during the light travel (approx 8 minutes) from the body being observed, while astrographic coordinates are only corrected for the other body's motion during that time. But Horizons says both sets of coordinates are corrected for light travel time. Anybody know what the difference is, or know a good reference that explains it? Also, is there a better way to ask XEphem for the time of the equinox? ...Akkana |
|
Re: deltat.c data question
FYI if anyone is interested I have found a reference that discusses this topic and the predictions in detail. I haven't worked through it yet, but I believe it answers my questions.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In xephem@..., "Eric" <svsarana@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: deltat.c data question
If you're saying to ask Steve, I just sent him an email. However I was hoping not to bother him if someone else might know the answer.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Oddly I can't open the credits window. I get a "Error: No running window found" message. --- In xephem@..., "ecdowney2002" <ecdowney@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: deltat.c data question
ecdowney2002
The short answer is Stephen L. Moshier via Michael Sternberg. Please see the Credits section of the Help for more information. Unfortunately some of the URLs quoted therein have grown stale.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Elwood --- In xephem@..., "Eric" <svsarana@...> wrote:
|
|
deltat.c data question
I've been looking at the techniques for the delta t calculation and trying to understand what is going on with the reference data.
The data in the tables don't match the years from the UNSO () where the deltat.c code says the data was taken from. Just a quick example set from the deltat.c vs. the UNSO data: deltat.c dt[1740]=12.0 Unso[1740]=13.5 deltat.c dt[1800]=13.7 Unso[1800]=12.6 deltat.c dt[1980]=50.54 Unso[1980]=50.54 Also the UNSO data stops at 1657, yet deltat.c has data from 1620-1656. Any one know where this comes from and why the early years like 1620 is so large (124.0)? Thanks, Eric |
|
New official mirror of the MAPUG website
The main website of the Meade Advanced Products Users Group is
hosted in the UK and occasionally has some connectivity issues. With the permission of MAPUG's webmaster, Ed Stewart, a mirror site in the USA is now available. MAPUG's main site is <> and the mirror site is <>. Links to both sites are now in this group's Links section per: MAPUG Main Website Main website of Meade Advanced Products Users Group and MAPUG Mirror Website Mirror website of Meade Advanced Products Users Group FYI: Meade's LX200 scopes are controllable by XEphem. |
|
Miranda ephemeris gone haywire after 1/1/2011?
Hi all
I'm running RC-11 under Cygwin and have found that starting 1/1/2011 the ephemeris for Uranus' satellite Miranda is completely out of whack. You can actually see it disappear if you run the time through 00.00UT. I checked with the calculator on the S&T website and the other satellites seem OK. I've checked the usual Cygwin related issues like EOL type etc, but to no avail. After 1/1/2011 the second set of data files are used (Uranus.1020), and I'm wondering whether there is an error in the BDL data for Miranda. Can anyone else confirm that they are seeing the same issue? thanks very much Piero |
|
Re: XEphem 3.7.1 in Ubuntu 10.10
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Santiago Roland wrote:
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:45:25 -0200Hello, try this: precisely add to your /etc/apt/sources.list line: deb-src binary-$(ARCH)/ then run: bash# apt-get update bash# apt-get source xephem (or for example apt-get source xephem=3.7.4-1) bash# cd xephem-3.7.4/ finally compile and build your package: bash# dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot and install it: bash# dpkg -i ../xephem_3.7.4-1_amd64.deb hope this help. These binaries haven't been tested on maverick so if you have any suggestions let me know. regards, -- Lukasz Sanocki |
|
Re: XEphem 3.7.1 in Ubuntu 10.10
Larry
--- On Wed, 12/22/10, Larry wrote:
|
|
Re: XEphem 3.7.1 in Ubuntu 10.10
Larry
I just joined the club because I'm having excactly that problem. In sky view mode, right-clicking to get the info box gives me info for the first item I click, but then hangs X windows. I've successfully used Xephem with Debian since Woody, and in Xubuntu, but it fails in this way in Mepis Antix 8.5 and in Puppy Linux 5.11.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'm open to any help. --- In xephem@..., Santiago Roland <sroland@...> wrote:
|
|
XEphem 3.7.1 in Ubuntu 10.10
Hi everyone, i have the original 3 CD set of XEphem 3.7.1 that my
astronomy department bought some while ago and under Ubuntu 10.04, the sky view mode crashed when right clicking in the sky background, does anybody experienced this? I fixed this because i found a precompiled XEphem 3.7.4 .deb file and i replaced the xephem executable in /usr/bin and that fixed the problem now in ubuntu 10.10 maverick i have some random rendering problem in the application menus, File, Data, etc,... the menu list is not rendered completely So, i was thinking in compiling the latest version in ubuntu 10.10 anyway, because may be there is more online support for doing this than for trying to fixe previous version's bugs. is there any online manual for compiling XEphem in Ubuntu 10.10 for 64 bits? or there is any info about this bugs i mentioned? Regards, -- Santiago Roland.- ------------------------- Los Molinos Observatory IAU Code 844 Montevideo, Uruguay ------------------------- |
|
Re: Paths Messed Up in Transfer to New Mac
Thanks to all who replied. It is the commercial version. I'm not a Unix guy--but I can muck about in the shell without breaking things. I fixed the problem by editing ~/.xephemrc to show the proper path.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks again! David --- In xephem@..., "ecdowney2002" <ecdowney@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Paths Messed Up in Transfer to New Mac
On 11/28/10 1:40 PM +0900, daffyddsant wrote:
links are messed up. When I type /usr/local/bin/xephem I get an errorCheck to see whether you have a .xephemrc file. If you do, it's likely the contents of the file point to the old directory, e.g.: XEphem.PrivateDir: /Users/trane/Library/XEphem You can edit that file to point to the new path. trane -- ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Trane Francks trane@... Shizuoka City, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. |
|
Re: Paths Messed Up in Transfer to New Mac
ecdowney2002
As always, thanks for jumping in to help Serge. However, since the original post mentions the CD I think David is referring to the Commercial version. I think your advise is more appropriate to the Free version since most Commercial users never even look at the INSTALL file or the GUI/xephem directory from the source tarball.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
So David, assuming the Commercial version, my first suggestion is to read the response to FAQ 3 in the UNIX section of the FAQ. (Go to and click on FAQ in the left column). I think what's going on is the ShareDir ahd/or PrivateDir are messed up. I think with the general information in the FAQ answer you can figure out what's going on. Note also that the original Mac installation package arranges for your PrivateDir to be ~/Library/XEphem by listing that in ~/.xephemrc and it also creates that directory for you, so it might just be that you need to create that directory once by hand. As a last resort I agree with Serge you could reinstall. Let us know how it goes. Elwood --- In xephem@..., Serge Montagnac <obs.psr@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Paths Messed Up in Transfer to New Mac
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOn 11/28/2010 05:40 AM, daffyddsant wrote:Hi David,I used Apple's Migration Assistant to copy files from an old Mac to a new one prior to wiping the old Mac. It brought XEphem over, but the links are messed up. When I type /usr/local/bin/xephem I get an error message saying /Users/dewi/Library/XEphem: No such file or directory . (Both the xephem directory and the xephem executable are where they ought to be.) Of course it can't find "dewi"--dewi was the home directory on the old computer. Can I edit a file or files to tell XEphem that it's on a new Mac, or do I need to reinstall (bought the disk version)? If I can edit (or if I need to delete something) kindly advise how/what. Many thanks, David What you have to do is to search and check if you have a real "xephem-3.x.x" directory somewhere, and if it is made of usual source tree :? xephem-3.x.x/GUI/xephem/ if you find it, you have, first to type that as root (administrator) in a terminal. # cd /usr/local/bin # ln -s? /xephem-3.x.x/GUI/xephem/xephem?? xephem # exit $ which create a link to xephem exec file and permits you to type as normal user $ xephem if it runs ... OK you may have to fix your own parameters in your own .xephem/XEphem file ... read? Elwood's xephem-3.x.x/INSTALL file (3a) section carefully. afterward, if you get other problems, you will have to check if there is a /usr/local/xephem/ directory in your Mac. if NOT ... , you just have to read back the INSTALL file to learn how to create or fix /usr/local/xephem and copy necessary data? in it. This is faster to do than it seems and? will be a good training about xephem and Unix installation routines, but if don't succeed ... I think wou will have to reinstall the package. Tell me back about ... Good luck ... , Serge. xephem-3.x.x/GUI/xephem/-- Criticism is something we can avoid easily by saying nothing, doing nothing, and being nothing -- Aristotle -------------------------- Serge Montagnac obs-psr@... -------------------------- |
|
Paths Messed Up in Transfer to New Mac
I used Apple's Migration Assistant to copy files from an old Mac to a new one prior to wiping the old Mac. It brought XEphem over, but the links are messed up. When I type /usr/local/bin/xephem I get an error message saying /Users/dewi/Library/XEphem: No such file or directory . (Both the xephem directory and the xephem executable are where they ought to be.)
Of course it can't find "dewi"--dewi was the home directory on the old computer. Can I edit a file or files to tell XEphem that it's on a new Mac, or do I need to reinstall (bought the disk version)? If I can edit (or if I need to delete something) kindly advise how/what. Many thanks, David |
|
Re: Xephem Web Update -- 3.7.5-RC10
Dan
Elwood,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Everything works perfectly now! Thank you very much. FYI: Running Fedora Core 13 and compiled perfectly! Dan On 10/22/2010 11:10 PM, ecdowney2002 wrote:
|