¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: thanks for using XEphem
I can understand your reasons. Personally, I disliked the Motif GUI and hoped that one day, you would re-write Xephem for a modern language and a 64-bit computer. But naturally, that would be your
By Doug Laidlaw · #3542 ·
thanks for using XEphem
Hello everyone, Some of you quickly noticed I recently removed XEphem from my web site. I didn't think there was much interest any longer so I was surprised at the outpouring of everything from anger
By ecdowney@... · #3539 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
Hi! This is may be the solution: How to Compile XEphem on Debian Linux <http://www.tc.umn.edu/~brams006/xephem_debian.html> Works fine, with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Debian 8. Regards, Harald
By Harald Bill · #3543 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
Greetings from Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, I just checked the clearsky institute web page today and Feel really bad about the last update on the xephem, it's no longer available??!!!? What happend? Eric
By Eric De La Cruz Lugo · #3538 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
I confirmed that Serge¡¯s minimum XLIBS works on cygwin-64 and CentOS 7: XLIBS = -lXm -lXt -lX11 ================================================================== Mike Mayer <mailto:mwmayer@...>
By Mike Mayer <mwmayer@...> · #3537 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
On 02/24/2016 03:56 PM, 'Elwood C. Downey' ecdowney@... [xephem] wrote: Thanks for the reports. I'm happy to hear the "stock" -lXm is working well these days, especially since I
By Serge Montagnac · #3536 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
Thanks for the reports. I'm happy to hear the "stock" -lXm is working well these days, especially since I don't provide one for x86_64. Not shocked to hear -lXp is no longer needed, it's had a long
By Elwood C. Downey <ecdowney@...> · #3535 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
Excellent! Works for Cygwin-64 as well. ================================================================== Mike Mayer mwmayer@...
By Mike Mayer <mwmayer@...> · #3534 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
Hi, I'm bulding pakages for debian/ubuntu (see *.debian.tar.gz at http://e2rd.piekielko.pl/debian/) and linking only to XLIBS = -lXm -lXt -lX11 instead of XLIBS = -lXm -lXp -lXt -lXext -lXmu -lX11
By ?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki · #3533 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
'Elwood C. Downey' ecdowney@... [xephem] writes: Sure enough! If I remove -lXp from XLIBS in the Makefile, xephem-3.7.7 compiles and runs using the Motif that's in Debian. It doesn't
By Akkana Peck · #3532 ·
Re: libXp removed from Debian
Hi Akkana, XEphem does not directly use -lXp at all, but it is needed by some -lXm. First thing to do is just try linking without it. Let me know... Elwood
By Elwood C. Downey <ecdowney@...> · #3531 ·
libXp removed from Debian
Just a heads-up for anyone building XEphem on Debian: Debian unstable ("Sid") and testing ("stretch") have removed the libxp6 package that used to provide libXp.so. Here is the bug tracking that
By Akkana Peck · #3530 ·
Re: address confirmation
Still using XPhem. Address active
By Rafael Gonzalez · #3529 ·
THIS IS NOT A ROLL CALL!
Hello Everyone! My apologies for not having addressed this flood sooner! I've been away from the computer. THERE IS NO NEED TO REPLY TO THIS LIST! All I was suggesting is that you may wish to verify
By John Perry <lists@...> · #3527 ·
Re: I'm still here.
On 12/18/2015 7:48 AM, Lamar Owen lowen@... wrote: > Ah, found it. > > Don, John Perry requested confirmation of e-mail addresses in a message > in the XEphem 3.7.7 under Mac OS X 10.11 (El
By John Perry <lists@...> · #3528 ·
Address confirmation
Hi, still here. -Marko T.
By MTo Astro <mtoastro@...> · #3526 ·
Re: address confirmation
I¡¯m still here. Mike Chapman
By Michael Chapman - Bigpond · #3525 ·
Re: address confirmation
I use Xephem! Maxim Kotov
By Maxim Kotov · #3524 ·
Re: I'm still here.
OK, well I'm here too. - Wayde ________________________________________ Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 6:48 AM To: xephem@... Subject: Re: [xephem] I'm still here. Ah, found it. Don, John
By Wayde Allen · #3523 ·
Re: I'm still here.
I have a feeling it's more, check you are using the same email address as when you registered so you know you can post - rather than reply to everyone. For example, I've been lurking on here for years
By Peter Mount · #3522 ·