开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
  1. Xcat
  2. Topics

Estate Sale! Yaesu-Icom-Flex

 

Yaesu FTDX-101D ---- $2400
Yaesu FTDX 5000MP & SM5000 MONITOR------$1900
Yaesu FTDX9000MP transceiver ---- $3600
?
Acom 1000 amplifier ----$1400
Elecraft KPA 500 with KAT500 ----$1280
Elecraft KX-3 --- $950
Elecraft k-3 100 ----$1600
?
Icom IC-7700 ------ $2140
Icom IC-7800 V3 ----- $2700
Icom IC-7600 ------ $1500
Icom IC-7610 ------ $2150
Kenwood TL-922A ----- $800
Alpha 8410 3000 ----- $2300
?
Extras...
Steppir Vertical Antenna
Avanti H/V Antenna Switch
Palstar AT2K Tuner
Daiwa SS-5505 PS
?
Extras: IC-718, Flex 6300, Flex 1500, FT-2900, LDG-2100, Daiwa Meter, SignaLink, EQ, Dentron Tuner
?
Pics with my QSL card will be provided.
?
AE5RV
Mr. Gary
ae5rv.gary@...
(312) 480-4004
 

Er, I'm not seeing the Syntor X / Xcat stuff?

De
 

Hi Guys,

Posts require my approval to prevent spam. However I usually change
the user's profile to allow free postings after the first approved
post to prevent delays. In this case although there weren't any
Syntors listed the rest of the stuff seemed like it would be of
reasonable interest to the group so I approved it.

If the group doesn't want to see offers of ham related equipment which
isn't specifically related to Syntors I won't approve such messages in
the future.

I must say that the estate sale subject also touched my heart since my
close friends WB6YMI, WB6CYT, N6HAE, and K6ENS have all passed over
the past few years.

73's Skip WB6YMH

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:48?PM RFI-EMI-GUY <rhyolite@...> wrote:

I think I have banned this person (scammer?) from one of my groups, now fixing to ban him from another:

He used different names, callsigns from same IP address:

"They accessed the web from: Windows Opera 96 - Dulles, Virginia, US (181.41.206.84)"
 

The message in question is very close to if not
identical to a spam message sent to many lists.

This may not be the person he purports to be.

Joe M.

On 5/4/2023 10:24 AM, Skip Hansen wrote:
Hi Guys,
Posts require my approval to prevent spam. However I usually change
the user's profile to allow free postings after the first approved
post to prevent delays. In this case although there weren't any
Syntors listed the rest of the stuff seemed like it would be of
reasonable interest to the group so I approved it.
If the group doesn't want to see offers of ham related equipment which
isn't specifically related to Syntors I won't approve such messages in
the future.
I must say that the estate sale subject also touched my heart since my
close friends WB6YMI, WB6CYT, N6HAE, and K6ENS have all passed over
the past few years.
73's Skip WB6YMH
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:48?PM RFI-EMI-GUY <rhyolite@...> wrote:

I think I have banned this person (scammer?) from one of my groups, now fixing to ban him from another:

He used different names, callsigns from same IP address:

"They accessed the web from: Windows Opera 96 - Dulles, Virginia, US (181.41.206.84)"
 

I own two Io/Groups , one for support of ICOM IC-R9000 the other ICOM IC-970.

In the past couple of months I have gotten two similar "for sale" ads , one identical to the above and one prior that was a very similar structured list (different gear) and also from a "5 area" ham and both with phone numbers that did not comport to their FCC license location. I blocked? both ads because the equipment did not pertain to the group focus .

The first individual I banned because there was suspicious activity with multiple changes of user ID prior to the posting. I have not banned "Gary" (yet) because I don't know if he is phony. I thought he was phony due to the IP address, but I need to check further in that regard.

The fact that in my case, "gary" had posted nothing prior to the advert raises suspicion. I have added a caveat emptor disclaimer to my sites on purchasing from folks using my sites.
 

Since almost everything in the list is > $1000 I would think caveat
emptor would be obvious.

Now that I think about it, a list where almost everything is >$1000 is
suspicious in itself.

Enough said, I won't approve further for sale posts until it's clearly
something **THIS** group would be interested in.

73's Skip WB6YMH

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:54?AM RFI-EMI-GUY <rhyolite@...> wrote:

I own two Io/Groups , one for support of ICOM IC-R9000 the other ICOM IC-970.

In the past couple of months I have gotten two similar "for sale" ads , one identical to the above and one prior that was a very similar structured list (different gear) and also from a "5 area" ham and both with phone numbers that did not comport to their FCC license location. I blocked both ads because the equipment did not pertain to the group focus .

The first individual I banned because there was suspicious activity with multiple changes of user ID prior to the posting. I have not banned "Gary" (yet) because I don't know if he is phony. I thought he was phony due to the IP address, but I need to check further in that regard.

The fact that in my case, "gary" had posted nothing prior to the advert raises suspicion. I have added a caveat emptor disclaimer to my sites on purchasing from folks using my sites.
 

... or simply mark up the price of your Xcat devices to $1000.00 each.



On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 1:38?PM Skip Hansen <skip@...> wrote:
Since almost everything in the list is > $1000 I would think caveat
emptor would be obvious.

Now that I think about it, a list where almost everything is >$1000 is
suspicious in itself.

Enough said, I won't approve further for sale posts until it's clearly
something **THIS** group would be interested in.

73's Skip WB6YMH

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:54?AM RFI-EMI-GUY <rhyolite@...> wrote:
>
> I own two Io/Groups , one for support of ICOM IC-R9000 the other ICOM IC-970.
>
> In the past couple of months I have gotten two similar "for sale" ads , one identical to the above and one prior that was a very similar structured list (different gear) and also from a "5 area" ham and both with phone numbers that did not comport to their FCC license location. I blocked? both ads because the equipment did not pertain to the group focus .
>
> The first individual I banned because there was suspicious activity with multiple changes of user ID prior to the posting. I have not banned "Gary" (yet) because I don't know if he is phony. I thought he was phony due to the IP address, but I need to check further in that regard.
>
> The fact that in my case, "gary" had posted nothing prior to the advert raises suspicion. I have added a caveat emptor disclaimer to my sites on purchasing from folks using my sites.
>







--
Pursuant to U.S. Code, title 47, Chapter 5, Sub chapter II, ?227,
"Any and all non solicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee of $500.00 U.S.". E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms.

1 - 7 of 7