Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
@ Skip,
Ah...good to know. I hope to spend a bit more time back on the "want to" list as well this weekend.
Seems the "need to" list insists on interfering with my "persuit of happiness" ....lol
By
swguest
·
#586
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
Yes it's still looking promising. I haven't finished setting my X9000
yet so it's still untested. I'm planning on working on it this
weekend.
73's Skip WB6YMH
<swguest@...>
By
Skip Hansen
·
#585
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
@ Skip,
...Just checking...
Is a pure SB9600 solution still looking promising or should I go ahead and tack the additional hardware items list to my Digikey order?
By
swguest
·
#584
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
If you can find a means to write select single bytes via SB9600 that will be a game changer. Even with expected re-writes in the 10k plus range before failure, I think VFO/FPP changes will wear hard
By
swguest
·
#583
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
Hi Stan,
The idea is to hex edit the data for the "VFO" mode on the fly. This
is based on my current belief that single bytes in EEPROM can be
written via SB9600. This is the key.
So frequency /
By
Skip Hansen
·
#582
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
@ Skip,
That definately sounds revolutionary. As you might guess that creates a number of followup queries.
I am looking forward to hearing your POC testing criteria and results..
Control, as in a
By
swguest
·
#581
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
Hi Stan,
At this point I think we know enough about the internal working of the
X9000 FW that we can control it STRICTLY over SB9600. I no longer think
we need to build a physical code plug
By
Skip Hansen
·
#580
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
@ Skip,
I'm intrigued. Fourtunately, I picked up a Pico to "stash" on an order previous to this project starting because it was an unbelievable deal. I plan to grab a few more on the next order "just
By
swguest
·
#579
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
Hi Stan,
I actually have a new idea that I haven't shared yet. Hold off on
everything other than the Pico for now. I don't have time to
elaborate at the moment, my wife is waiting for me to go out.
By
Skip Hansen
·
#578
·
|
Re: Xcat 9000 Rev B
@ Skip,
I'm making up a Digikey order list.
I've got other non X9000 related stuff to get, so I figured to make one "complete as possible" order and save on shipping.
I am presuming your KiCad files
By
swguest
·
#577
·
|
Re: DIY Xcats
Hi Brad,
No you need to flash it the first time using a programmer.
What I probably did was use the programmer to flash the loader and
some old version of the application then I updated to the
By
Skip Hansen
·
#576
·
|
Re: DIY Xcats
Hi Skip, and thanks for the encouragement.
Let me ask you simply, should the Xcat application software be used to upload the firmware when only the bootloader is programmed on the PIC?
If so, then
By
Bradley Andrews
·
#575
·
|
Re: DIY Xcats
Hi Brad,
I think you've figured it out. There are lots of lost bits in my
memory, but reading the comments in the bootloader code it appears
that it expects the application to have put a jump to the
By
Skip Hansen
·
#574
·
|
Re: DIY Xcats
Skip,
I have a question about programming, but first some background and a progress report:
- A couple weeks ago, after I’d gotten my boards, I programmed a PIC with picldr.hex using my
By
Bradley Andrews
·
#573
·
|
Re: Code plug Rx and Tx frequencies cracked
Yes Mike, please!
How was the file generated, hex editing or RSS?? If RSS what version?
I don't have any examples of more than 64 modes and I don't think the RSS I'm using supports it.
73's Skip
By
Skip Hansen
·
#572
·
|
Re: Code plug Rx and Tx frequencies cracked
Skip, I have some 128 mode Loband and UHF .RDT files if they would be any help to you.
tnx
Mike / K5JR
Alpharetta GA
By
Mike / K5JR
·
#571
·
|
Re: Code plug Rx and Tx frequencies cracked
I call bull. :-)
Since there is no such thing as 'inverted' DPL/DCS/CDCSS/Etc there is no compatibility issue aside from knowing the conversion between inverted vs normal codes.
Motorola probably
By
Joe M.
·
#570
·
|
Re: Code plug Rx and Tx frequencies cracked
When I was refreshing my (lack of) memory on DCS one thing that I
noticed was the inverting was really only of concern when talking from
one manufacturer to another. Maybe big M left out
By
Skip Hansen
·
#569
·
|
Re: Code plug Rx and Tx frequencies cracked
RSS doesn't seem to have an option for inverting, so you have to do it
by entering the inverse code instead. Therefore I don't think they
expended a bit on it in the code plug. That's interesting
By
Dennis Boone
·
#568
·
|
Re: Code plug Rx and Tx frequencies cracked
Some of the extra info could be normal/inverted.
Someone decided it would sound good to double the codes with 'inverted' codes, but in reality it's all marketing, as every inverted code corresponds
By
Joe M.
·
#567
·
|