Consensus Structure Data from Krackhardt 1987
|
Hello everyone! I was pulled up the "Krack-High-Tec" dataset in Netdraw and generated the "Advice" network, as shown below. It has 190 ties. I went back to study how the dataset was generated and (re-)discovered that there were a few different sociograms depicted in the paper. Figure 1 in the paper was the LAS or locally aggregated structure. Figure 2 was the sociogram of the consensus structure.? I mention all of this because I can't figure our the relationship between the sociogram that I've generated with the "Krack-High-Tec" dataset? and the sociograms in Figures 1 and 2 of the paper. Any help/insight would be most appreciated! thoughtfully Starling |
|||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi Starling, figure 1 matches for me. Note that it is an ilas on the ¡°krackad¡± dataset. See Transform|Aggregate|CSS in the menu. ? ? It looks like fig 2 is a consensus structure using .5 as the threshold. I think it matches too. ? ? steve ? Stephen P. Borgatti Carol Martin Gatton Chair of Management Gatton College of Business and Economics University of Kentucky ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
starlingdavidhunter via groups.io
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 10:41 To: [email protected] Subject: [ucinet] Consensus Structure Data from Krackhardt 1987 ?
CAUTION: External Sender ? Hello everyone! ? I was pulled up the "Krack-High-Tec" dataset in Netdraw and generated the "Advice" network, as shown below. It has 190 ties. ? I went back to study how the dataset was generated and (re-)discovered that there were a few different sociograms depicted in the paper. Figure 1 in the paper was the LAS or locally aggregated structure. Figure 2 was the sociogram of the consensus structure.? ? I mention all of this because I can't figure our the relationship between the sociogram that I've generated with the "Krack-High-Tec" dataset? and the sociograms in Figures 1 and 2 of the paper. ? Any help/insight would be most appreciated! ? thoughtfully Starling ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
|||
|
Thanks so much, Steve! That's just what I needed to know. thoughtfully Starling On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 5:03?PM Steve Borgatti via <sborgatti=[email protected]> wrote:
|
|||
|
Steve again thanks! Actually, something else just occurred?to me...is it possible to generate the ties that are only in Fig 2 in the paper i.e. the consensus network with 0.5 as the threshold?thoughtfully Starling On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 5:03?PM Steve Borgatti via <sborgatti=[email protected]> wrote:
|
