开云体育

Dkamp

Here is how I envision a workable solution:

(1) All interested parties need to make a list of what problems they
want solved.
(2) These problems need to be listed then voted on by the interested
parties.
(3) Their needs to be an agreement on what problems there will be
solutions for.
(4) We need a group of people that will meet the financial
requirements. By meet I mean a small group with large pockets or a
large group that can kick in $50 to $100. What ever it would take for
the design costs.
(5) There would have to be some organization structure and or format
that would give the group input.
(6) A lead designer will have to be given the authority and be in
charge to make the decisive final necessary decisions to move the
project along timely.
(7) A committee and or board would be formed that would represent the
team and be in charge. There cannot be mob rule, but active
participation will be encouraged. Professional people will hold these
positions.
(8) Legal documents will be signed. All paying members will own a
stake in the software. Owners will pay cash upfront and receive
receipts and documentation.
(9) Initial cash will pay for professional system analysis and
design. Programmers will be determined by bid and or selection after
system analysis and design is completed. Owners will be expected to
come up with monies for final coding of project.
(10) Resumes and references will be required to select members that
will be actively participating in the system analysis and design and
coding.
(11) Coding will be compartmentalized to ensure software ownership
security.
(12) As soon as we come up with the cash and a competent team then we
will move the dialog from the public forum to a secure system for
development.

I estimate about $10,000 to complete a design, but that may change
with the amount of interest and the bells and whistles wanted. I have
people that I have worked with on projects that are reasonable cost
wise and very competent to execute what this project would entail.

Bottom line there is over 124 members and interested parties on the
Yahoo spin off thread since this thread was first posted. It is the
little guy against the big boys and I smell blood. The problem is
that there are many lone wolves running down rabbit trails and that
is not the solution for everyone. There are those that will always go
that path but what I propose is organization and structure and people
that work well within the team environment. We need a place to post
resumes.
Everyone welcome those with just cash and also those with IT skills
and cash. If you are interested in being part owner and would like to
make a commitment in cash and or sweat please email and or post

Thanks dkamp for the questions, I will be out until Thursday night. A
Q for you. Would the elite trader link thread help the quest? I see
that you frequent there.

Worth Repeating:

"goldensilvermana":

"It is the
little guy against the big boys and I smell blood. The problem is
that there are many lone wolves running down rabbit trails and that
is not the solution"


--- In twsapi@y..., "goldensilvermana" <kybryan@c...> wrote:

Dkamp

Here is how I envision a workable solution:

(1) All interested parties need to make a list of what problems

they

want solved.
(2) These problems need to be listed then voted on by the

interested

parties.
(3) Their needs to be an agreement on what problems there will be
solutions for.
(4) We need a group of people that will meet the financial
requirements. By meet I mean a small group with large pockets or a
large group that can kick in $50 to $100. What ever it would take

for

the design costs.
(5) There would have to be some organization structure and or

format

that would give the group input.
(6) A lead designer will have to be given the authority and be in
charge to make the decisive final necessary decisions to move the
project along timely.
(7) A committee and or board would be formed that would represent

the

team and be in charge. There cannot be mob rule, but active
participation will be encouraged. Professional people will hold

these

positions.
(8) Legal documents will be signed. All paying members will own a
stake in the software. Owners will pay cash upfront and receive
receipts and documentation.
(9) Initial cash will pay for professional system analysis and
design. Programmers will be determined by bid and or selection

after

system analysis and design is completed. Owners will be expected to
come up with monies for final coding of project.
(10) Resumes and references will be required to select members that
will be actively participating in the system analysis and design

and

coding.
(11) Coding will be compartmentalized to ensure software ownership
security.
(12) As soon as we come up with the cash and a competent team then

we

will move the dialog from the public forum to a secure system for
development.

I estimate about $10,000 to complete a design, but that may change
with the amount of interest and the bells and whistles wanted. I

have

people that I have worked with on projects that are reasonable cost
wise and very competent to execute what this project would entail.

Bottom line there is over 124 members and interested parties on the
Yahoo spin off thread since this thread was first posted. It is the
little guy against the big boys and I smell blood. The problem is
that there are many lone wolves running down rabbit trails and that
is not the solution for everyone. There are those that will always

go

that path but what I propose is organization and structure and

people

that work well within the team environment. We need a place to post
resumes.
Everyone welcome those with just cash and also those with IT skills
and cash. If you are interested in being part owner and would like

to

make a commitment in cash and or sweat please email and or post

Thanks dkamp for the questions, I will be out until Thursday night.

A

Q for you. Would the elite trader link thread help the quest? I see
that you frequent there.

--- In twsapi@y..., "goldensilvermana" <kybryan@c...> wrote:

Dkamp

Here is how I envision a workable solution:

What is this in response to? This post makes it sound like the
charter of this group is to develop some trading platform, not to
discuss the TWS API.

It is the little guy against the big boys and I smell blood.

Huh? Blood? This makes no sense to me. Personally, by implementing
my own solution, I am not competing with the "big boys." Only if I am
planning on selling it do I compete. I am developing something
because nothing exists that does what I need.

The problem is that there are many lone wolves running down rabbit
trails and that is not the solution

We are running down different trails. If people truly have the same
needs, these should be communicated to IB as TWS feature requests.
Personally, I am almost certain that my requirements are different
than others'.

--- In twsapi@y..., "kgeis" <kgeis@y...> wrote:

The problem is that there are many lone wolves running down rabbit
trails and that is not the solution

We are running down different trails. If people truly have the same
needs, these should be communicated to IB as TWS feature requests.
Personally, I am almost certain that my requirements are different
than others'.

This is just a thread within Scott's larger discussion board, adding
to the intellectual liquidity of the board. No need for all of us to
have the same aspirations.