开云体育

Hi, In order to avoid the non-sequential events problem with the API, it would be useful to either try another approach or have a redundant system to send orders/get trade status data. Since the TWS

I've run tests on a Win98 machine with VB ActiveX to the TWS and haven't noticed the problems you mention. Are you doing a lot of object creation and destruction in your code or graphical calls to the

sorry, here is the updated link: http://bullhaven.tripod.com/TradeExecutor New version of TradeExecutor should be out soon. --- evbostel <ervbo@...> wrote:

The link is not working (for me) anyway Eric

Hello, we are working on an ATS which uses signals of a neural network to pass to the TWS via ActiveX using VB. The application runs stable on a Win2000 and a Win XP computer (testet with several

classes, I have not even looked at the ActiveX, except a quick look initially when i was looking at the overview. The first thing you notice, the methods and properties of the ActiveX version, are

Matt, What is your take on the API in general ? ...your a Pro. I Want To Hear What You Have To Say... Your updates concerning your work at E-Signal are certainly welcome and appreciated, but I am

Grozzie... "The ActiveX and sockets are one and the same. ActiveX is just a dll with code to provide the sockets functionality into an ActiveX environment." So what are the DLL calls?...have you

Hi All, Just responding to the questions about eSignal/IB. We'll have a beta available of IB integrated into eSignal sometime in August. It's hard to say if that's August 1 or August 31 as we're

3 just The ActiveX and sockets are one and the same. ActiveX is just a dll with code to provide the sockets functionality into an ActiveX environment. There is also a C++ wrapper for the sockets, so

I thought there were 3 API's: DDE, ActiveX, and sockets. Were all 3 just recently thrown together? And were they all in the original TWS? Kent

How could it be feature creap? The API was just recently thrown together. Seems more like a prototype to me. Richard } } Sounds good in theory. But take a look at the title of this thread that has }

Sounds good in theory. But take a look at the title of this thread that has been going on for some time now. Kent

Hi all, I am a beginer in programming ans do not exactly understand what should be done. Hope somebody can help. TWS does not accept STP orders for Ftse 100 index futures. I would like to create the

Yes, plus it allows them to "add features" without touching the back end. I would think it's a smaller and more-contained project to add features to the client rather than fiddle with the servers.

Probably just a feature creep cascade. "Hey, can you make it so we can access data from TWS via DDE?" "Sure!" "Hey, can you make it so we can place orders using the DDE interface?" "Sure!" "Hey, DDE

I think they should also "can" Active X and go to a pair of DLL's. One for the account, one for data. difficult many affairs.

I completley second this suggestion. I am astounded at how difficult they have made this...perhaps complex is a better word. Programming is intrinsically easy...the difficulty and complexity seem to

I haven't tried, but I think you placeneworder with the same orderID that you used on the original order that you are modifying.

Rather than cancel and resending the order Thanks Chas