Re: new primary location of tws api documentation
also, though my pull requests at github were forwarded to the api team, there is a new way to report issues with the documentation: they seem to be pretty responsive.
By
fordfrog
·
#52193
·
|
Re: new primary location of tws api documentation
Thank you! I did not know they had moved their API documentation.
By
J G
·
#52191
·
|
new primary location of tws api documentation
today i received an email from ib with regard to my recent contribution to tws api documentation. here's a quote from the email related to the new documentation location: i have completely missed this
By
fordfrog
·
#52190
·
|
Direct orders to TGATE are routed SMART, status stay dark blue
Good evening, since years I am sending orders via API (Excel) direct with PrimExchange = TGATE and Exchange = TGATE (no smart routing). I never faced any problems. Since yesterday I see these orders
By
Daniel
·
#52189
·
|
Re: No or delayed response on placed orders using IB Python API TWS 10.19 on Linux EC2
Possibly facing disconnection/reconnection? Explore a finite state machine to detect lost orders, resend when logic conditions are met.
By
fran <fchiesadoc@...>
·
#52188
·
|
Re: Python Datetime Processing (US/Eastern)
Hi there, I came across a very similar problem myself and found the following discussion that solved my problem. Hope it helps. /g/twsapi/topic/adding_timezone_to_request/93271054
By
tnhg@...
·
#52187
·
|
No or delayed response on placed orders using IB Python API TWS 10.19 on Linux EC2
Hello, I've been using the TWS Python API for almost two years for automatically trading futures. I run my code on an amazon Linux EC2 machine, Python 3.9.5 , ibapi version 9.81.1.post1, TWS version
By
yonatan@...
·
#52186
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
with regard to oca groups, i recall from my experience several years back (when trading options) that when overfill protection is used, only one order is sent to the exchange (it's also clearly
By
fordfrog
·
#52185
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
I had started on replying a few times but was preempted by something claiming higher priority each time. I'll have to look into this some more, but here at least a quick response. I wrote my reply
By
J¨¹rgen Reinold
·
#52184
·
|
Python Datetime Processing (US/Eastern)
Hi, Does anyone know the directive for converting a string into a datetime in python? e.g. DateOne = "20231205 08:30:00 US/Eastern" datetime.strptime(DateOne,"%Y%m%d %H:%M:%S %???") where %??? is the
By
Python1382 <shane_henry@...>
·
#52183
·
|
Re: Probability Chart
Looks like nobody have a straight answer. So I share my opinion: I don't see any part of the API aimed at delivering any data close to analysis, or indicators, information, (any outcome of a massage
By
Gordon Eldest
·
#52182
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
Yes, it¡¯s not completely accurate, but you have to decide whether it¡¯s accurate enough for your purposes. If you compare a chart generated with this data against one using the full data, you¡¯ll
By
Richard L King
·
#52181
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
So If I'm understanding right, the tick data from reqMktData ( https://interactivebrokers.github.io/tws-api/md_request.html ) is inaccurate, and I should be using tick data it seems like. (
By
@Kevin111
·
#52180
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
Thanks for the link, i'll take a look.
By
@Kevin111
·
#52179
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
My post describing my understanding of IBKR¡¯s market data sampling mechanism is here: /g/twsapi/message/8821 This post is very old, but I¡¯ve not seen anything that leads me to
By
Richard L King
·
#52178
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
Cool, I will contact IBKR and see if I can get some clarification. I'm using reqMktData.
By
@Kevin111
·
#52177
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
J¨¹rgen Please can you explain what you mean by ¡®You should be able to force any order type to be simulated by IBKR when you place the order into a One Cancels All group¡¯. I don¡¯t believe
By
Richard L King
·
#52176
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
Looks like your triggers should work since, according to the IBKR documents, the order types you use are no native exchange order types. Maybe the next step would be to reach out to IBKR for
By
J¨¹rgen Reinold
·
#52175
·
|
Re: Duplicate OrderID
I track my own open positions, so checking the max orderId before the session start seems to work just fine.
By
bespalex
·
#52174
·
|
Re: Anyone have any success modifying the trigger method?
Hello J¨¹rgen, Thanks for the reply. What I mean by "they all default to what appears to be bid/ask for buy/sell", this is based off on logging the tick data of the price, and comparing when the order
By
@Kevin111
·
#52173
·
|