开云体育

Just to update. IB did not bother to reply to any of the tickets. P&l not updating accurately in net liquidation value and total cash, confirmed by myself (UK) and our trader (Ukraine) on paper

If an investment account has a funding level at $X, and there are stock orders for different stocks trying to buy such as $A, $B, $C, or $D. Where A<X but A+B >X. Would the IB trading system allow

I looked at time and sales in TWS for the period you reported and the very first tick at 08:00:04.364 is not even on the tape, while some of those ticks that are on the tape are not on SWB. This just

Thanks, That's interesting - I hadn't realised there was a price multiplier - I guess that's why I've been falling off the end of their list. But by the sound of things, this still means my price of

Correcting my math in the previous post: A price of 1077 for an instrument with price multiplier 100 corresponds to: LowEdge 10, Interval 1/200 1/200 * (100 price magnifier) = 0.5 minTick

Just to report back, unfortunately my "hack" didn't work and I yet again had orders being rejected for allegedly not conforming to minimum price variation. But when I look in TWS, the price that was

Hmm OK, thanks. I checked a few other feeds and I got the same sort of thing. Maybe they had a weird technical glitch that day. So as far as you are aware this should be the opening price that the

The child orders are placed in an OCA group, so generally speaking, only one order will execute and the others will be cancelled. However, OCAs are not magic, and there are rare situations where more

From my experience, TWS always automatically combines child orders in an OCA group.

It looks pretty bizzare to me that you get multiple different prices for this tick for the same day indeed. I don't know if this request was made before or after the regular trading start, but I never

Hi Richard I am curious, since it is a bracket with a 3rd child, will the system ensure only one order fills, and scale all 3 bracket orders on a partial fill. You mentioned in a prior post to be

Partial quote from Francois G: "reqId (used in any function NOT related to orders) may start from 1 every time you start your app, and should increment by 1 at every request, as long as you use your

Is anyone using the Open Tick, tick ID 14? https://interactivebrokers.github.io/tws-api/tick_types.html I'd initially hoped it was the open price for the day based on the description. " Current

Actually these are related but slightly different issues. In you case from what I understood the increments are missing from the increments list as the prices are higher than the increments listed? In

You probably have to call the appropriate trading desk during working hours and create orders through them. -- Best regards, Chernikov Aleksandr, e-mail: me@... skype: helld.ru RU:

Probably over a year ago I mistakenly bought a TSE stock - 4502 - and can't close the position, no matter how hard I try. I get the error: Close order cannot be created because rounded order size is 0

Agreed. I think it's poor show. For live trading it's inexcusable. I (hopefully) solved my issue by tacking on increments to the 1918 rule I get back from IB: [1000, 0.5];[2000, 1.0];[10000, 5.0].

I've had this issue repeatedly, particularly with one specific European exchange. Orders get rejected even though the price conforms to the published market rule and price increment at the time. IB

You should never take something you read about the API at face value, for example "I recall seeing a posting claiming you can't add a third child.". It doesn't matter who posts it, we all make

Nick is right about orderId and reqId. Maybe should we precise that reqId (used in any function NOT related to orders) may start from 1 every time you start your app, and should increment by 1 at