开云体育

Well, for practical purposes, whether it's a "bug" or not is a moot point. But, just as you wouldn't call it a bug, I wouldn't necessarily call it a great improvement either ;-) That said, I

We are talking about entirely different cases * when the data never arrives in 10.30+ or * when it does arrive but not within the time @ajn is willing to wait for. Even if data always arrives within

Of course, what's also interesting, is this could actually be a bug w/ 10.19 instead. That is, 10.19 might be providing <ins>bad</ins> data in a timely manner instead of timing out. Unfortunately,

Even if it did, that wouldn't explain why it arrives in time when using 10.19. If you run the test case as prescribed, and compare the results of 10.19 vs 10.30+, you'll probably see what I mean. I

Rarely is lack of "last hop" bandwidth the root cause for network issues. In my experience it is pretty much always latency. That is latency from processing, end-to-end "flight time", congestion along

Each time when you connect you apparently use client ID zero: eConnect(Host, Port, 0). When you disconnect this client you must allow IBKR time to close all processes related to this client on their

omg thank you. Didn't realize this was markdown compatible.

I have IBClient that implements EWrapper that I copied from C# samples from official TWS repository. When some event happens, I would like to destroy existing client and create new instance. This is

This is not correct: all three orders must have unique order ids. But the TP and SL orders must have “ParentId” set to the “OrderId” of the main order. Sent: 19 December 2024 05:28 To:

Thank you. I will try this. [email protected]> wrote:

Thanks to everyone for their suggestions.? I flailed around for longer than I would like to admit before finding a send email solution that works for me. 1) I found out gmail offers something called

For the future readers. I was using data coming from Schwab and each SPX contract had two dates, "LastTradingDate" and "ExpirationDate". I was trying to use option contract expiring the same day to

Uh, my sanity is restored :) As for your comment about the network, yes my dev setup is in EU (yet its 250Mbit up/down fiber, typically no issues here with Internet otherwise, but of course anything

Ok, I managed to reproduce the problem.

Once you've set up the appropriate Telegram bot on your Telegram account, sending a message programmatically is pretty easy. ?Here's my (redacted) code for that: #!/usr/bin/env python3 import

Another option is Telegram. I wouldn't trust too much on email as it's very difficult these days to have your mail accepted by the receiving end as non-spam or not get blocked. For instant

I see the same. It looks like you only get VOLUME or BARCOUNT if you ask for TRADES. That doesn’t seem unreasonable to me. Richard

I just ran your sample program again, after hours w/ realtime, data_lines=75, loops=5 and everything worked OK using IBGW 10.30.1s. IDK what to say... I may try it again tomorrow since you indicate

Thank you very much! yes, I can confirm it is there, at least it was all day for me on that very code and right now. (yet it is funky atm, see end of post) can you run it with several loops? It is

I presume you mean the problem <ins>will still exhibit itself</ins>. Can you confirm? Because I just ran your last sample program (w/ inconsequential changes for convenience; see attached) against a