开云体育

This limit is for requests you send to TWS and does not concern any replies that TWS sends to you. TWS can send many more than 50 messages per second. So in your example it would count as one

I know, it's a pretty old thread and Frank Bell implies that it may even impossible to constantly avoid the 50 msg/sec limit. But one question: what is counted as a message? If I sent a request to

I can find all kind of info on maintenance margins but the only initial margin figure I have is aggregated. I am interested in monitoring the initial margin requirement for each of my portfolio

I've done quite a bit of work on the sample ActiveX workbook on IB's behalf in the past, and I think that might be a better starting point than the DDE version, primarily because I'm really not

In my case that is exactly what it is - wash sale losses.? I don't know in Mark's case. Hugh

Just brainstorming, so this is probably incorrect. What if IB is taking into account wash sale losses into your cost basis (average price) of the position and these wash sale loss calculations happen

Mark, I've seen the same thing using TWS build 10.12.2h.? I'm in the U.S. ? In my case It appears to be showing the tax basis value for the position, not the actual average price paid for the

Hi Richard, A good idea, but apparently not. Accounts view has a table that shows as attached, is it possible that there's a position hidden somehow? I see no evidence of it in the account statement

This is probably a silly suggestion, but are you quite sure you don't have an existing position from back when it was trading at the higher price? Sent: 21 March 2022 10:30 To:

Bump up to see if anyone could help or point to any resources / examples that I could use?? Thanks a lot! Alternatively, I have noticed from the admin letter that it may be possible to seek (paid)

No joy. I've updated, and still the same bizarre average price. It happens overnight, when the trade is fresh it is correct, in the morning the prices are different. Once it's wrong, it remains wrong

I've seen it with my paper trading account the last few days. I have a funded account and subscriptions. I assume that paper orders have a lower priority than real orders and may get deferred when

Salut Jurgen funny thing, I got no volume / count / vwap data for 2 weeks, ca 90min after posting everything got normal again. In meantime, I tried several machines via AWS x86 linux / windows / mac

Thanks, I'll do that. Best wishes, M <TwsApiOnGroupsIo@...> wrote: -- +44 (0) 7528 551604 gulfstream-software.com Gulfstream Software - Winner Risk Management Awards 2010 This

TWS 10.12 is outdated for a while and we had a lot of issues with the 10.12 versions, Mark. "Stable" is 981.3k right now while "Latest" is Version 10.14.1e. Might make sense to check out either or

No response from IB, The trades placed today all show normal average price. Something like average fill price should not be esoteric so I think there is a definite bug in the TWS version, I'm using

That's a good observation. The scale is well wide though. The difference in average price is worth around 7000 USD on this trade (160k traded). It's very very wild. Best wishes M

You are from he UK, aren't you? The average price will also include stamp tax. IB treats it like it were commission. This can be over 20 GBP on a trade. I had to learn this myself when I was trading

Which version of TWS or IBGW are you using, Sebastian? And does your query get handled by a paper or real account? I just ran our historical data tester on TSLA (conid 76792991, exchange SMART) via

Salut Im using TSLA OHLC daily bar trade market data via reqHistoricalData (history and updates) for some years already - new since 2022-03-01: there is no delivery of volume / count / vwap anymore