开云体育

I am using the Qcharts OCX and Qcharts feed. I am not part of the QDP developers group...too expensive...but I am a paying member for their regular live data service. I have their OCX and have

Which data provider do you use that has an ActiveX component? ... Dan

I think this is a fine idea and these could be put in the files section. We should not do so without the express approval of IB though. Anyone who has retained prior versions, please email IB

The yahoo boards do allow polling....but here is the rub... They require that the email list of the group be made public outside of the board... I opted out of that option out of respect for the

At the risk of being redundent... Yes it lacks time stamps and there are implications to this. First off tickPrice and tickSize do NOT pulse concurentley. Early on with my developement I crafted a

One thing i do on the yahoo board i run, is when a new member signs up i approve him/her(It?). Theres another setting that when you approve that allows you to approve each msg that person sends.

I for one would like to see a commercial posting of a new available product. IMHO, once is news, repeated infomation on same topic then becomes spam. JMHO, Regards, Knyyt

You're right. It doesn't have time stamps or cumulative volume. correct?

Aloha, The API appears not to support time stamps on quotes. Is this correct? Or did I miss it? Thanks Richard

} > It is my intent to slowly grow the tutorial project step by step as } > time goes on....anyone wishing to contribute is welcome. } } That should be one of the great features of this board

Scott, is there a way to create and manage a couple of lists/polls up here that would collect our votes for desired improvements and needed bug fixes for TWS and the API? (I guess you could actually

Not "single"....ancillary...pet rock wrote: Input

Something I'd like to see this group put together is an archive of say the last 3 versions of the IB TWS in a spot that is accessible and organized by version number. This way we can install a

It's good for public message boards to be run by extreme optimists, whether the optimism makes any economic sense or not. :)

A problem with this single approach is that we may have different objectives. I'm trying to develop an automated option day-trading system using vb.net. Other are looking for a position-trading

"That should be one of the great features of this board (i.e., providing a non-trivial set of starting projects). " I would go beyond that... Imagine a nucleus project growing. Every week or so it

That should be one of the great features of this board (i.e., providing a non-trivial set of starting projects). With respect to censorship, I'd vote for letting "commercial" interests show up here

Let me clarify...I will never ever censor or hold up posts never ever I want all to be clear on that Scott totally discussion.

I dont mean moderate the posts before there posted.... It would be nice to have a couple of guys with the power to yank in case some spammer gets in or something lame is posted... I firmly against

Why not allow people who post responsibly for a few days. Become unmoderated. Reducing your workload while allowing quick discussion. Regards Chasman.