开云体育

That should be one of the great features of this board (i.e., providing a non-trivial set of starting projects). With respect to censorship, I'd vote for letting "commercial" interests show up here

Let me clarify...I will never ever censor or hold up posts never ever I want all to be clear on that Scott totally discussion.

I dont mean moderate the posts before there posted.... It would be nice to have a couple of guys with the power to yank in case some spammer gets in or something lame is posted... I firmly against

Why not allow people who post responsibly for a few days. Become unmoderated. Reducing your workload while allowing quick discussion. Regards Chasman.

Scott: I don't really feel I am qualified to moderate however, I am part of a trading group that meets online 2x week days, Tues & Thur 9P.M.Eastern & Sat A.M. for one hour. Is it possible that at

Well with 209 Members in 2 days I am little stunned... I will need to have a few people willing to moderate when I am not on.... Please private email if you are interested and give me a 20 Second

IB Mgt Please review the use of banner on this message board...Our discussion expands on the use of TWS API.... IB Mgt Response We are fine for now, but reserve the right to change our

Can you please get me Todds Email Address? Scott

} [...] } } Planet Source Safe: http://www.planet-source-code.com/ } } The Planet Source site has an excellent searchable code base. } Submissions are rated. Planet Source is the largest public

Best of luck to Todd and his new for-sale AutoExecutor Program that implements auto-stops: http://bullhaven.tripod.com/TradeExecutor/TradeExecutor.htm

Hi tripack. I'm sure your description fits most of IB's traders who use the API. A few of us are just trying to think a bit outside the lone wolf box. With respect to your reference to "open

It is possible to waste years debating Java vs. Microsoft or VB vs. C++ etc., and the debate doesn't get you anywhere. I view this forum as a way to share code, learn from what others are doing and

This is just a thread within Scott's larger discussion board, adding to the intellectual liquidity of the board. No need for all of us to have the same aspirations.

please change my auto responder from yobryan@... to kybryan@... thanks

Hi Dion. This could be fun. Let's get all the .NET negatives out in the open. I guess some counterpoints to the runtime objection would be, - 20MB is (or is fast becoming) small potatoes, MS has

What is this in response to? This post makes it sound like the charter of this group is to develop some trading platform, not to discuss the TWS API. Huh? Blood? This makes no sense to me.

The problem with .NET is that you have to distribute a 20MB .NET runtime to everyone. Even Windows XP does not have the .NET runtime included by default. Monday, June 10, 2002, 2:50:02 PM, you

Thanks Scott for getting responses. Seems like way to go in a cooperative project is to get participants to use .NET framework, where language choice is least likely to cause problems, and C/C++

hi-thanks for the e-mail. Will be gone for a few days and will respond after that. Please send future e-mails to kybryan@... thanks dtkamp wrote:

Done