On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:50 PM, <erik@...> wrote:
Yes, ref level and attenuation are linked as you would expect so the noise floor comes up with increasing attenuation but signals stay on same level.
=====================================================================
Erik,
1. Very, happy to see selectable front end attenuation.? One of the best ways to determine if a signal is real or not is to add rf attenuation.? If the signal stays at the same level you know it is real but if it drops dramatically it was not.? I usually have to hunt down an external attenuator to perform this check on a low cost spectrum analyzer.
2. Any possibility of adding a menu for selectable display units (i.e. dBm, dBuV, uV)?
3. Average detector not an option but video averaging can be accomplished by setting video bandwidth lower than the resolution bandwidth.
4. I didn't see a sweep-time menu option on the wiki page to allow the user to manually adjust the sweep rate.? Sometimes necessary to capture some signals.
5. Can a external generator be selected for more accurate level calibration instead of the built in calibrator?? Not everyone has access to a calibrated rf generator, but it would be nice to allow those that have one to use it for extra accuracy.
6. Trace math - thumbs up!
7. Zero span - does x-axis change to time domain units?
8. Are the live and stored traces available for usb readout using the "data 0" and "data 1"? NanoVNA console commands?
I think you have struck a good balance between features and specifications.? Wish you and hugen much success.
- Herb