¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Setting the Date/time on a New Tiny SA Ultra
I did the same thing with the same results. RTFM ! (Instructions in this case) de Paul, W8AEF _____ Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [tinysa] Setting the
By Paul <w8aef@...> · #11205 ·
Re: Setting the Date/time on a New Tiny SA Ultra
On input date screen at left you can see SET DATE *YYMMDD* YY - mean 2 digits of year MM - mean 2 digits of month DD - mean 2 digits of day So in your case need set 230411
By DiSlord · #11204 ·
Re: Setting the Date/time on a New Tiny SA Ultra
Hi Eric, I set the date by entering 2023 04 11 No luck then I tried 04 11 2023 No luck again Then I tried 11 04 2023 zip, nadda, nothing. Always goes back to the original date. Mark
By mjavit01 · #11203 ·
Re: Level Discrepancy Between 2 TinySA Ultras
Herb, Thanks again! I guess that I can always go back to the generic values if I "mess-up". I will print them out first to see if they agree with what you gave me in a previous email. -- Ed, K0KC
By Ed Wilson · #11202 ·
Re: Level Discrepancy Between 2 TinySA Ultras
Ed, I'm sure Erik or Kurt will correct me if I'm wrong, but from the way the table values trend upwards at the high end of the frequency range, it looks like the "generic" values in dB are added to
By hwalker · #11201 ·
Re: Noise Figure measurement procedures for the tinySA ULTRA #ultra
We learn the most from what we can not explain -- For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #11200 ·
Re: Level Discrepancy Between 2 TinySA Ultras
Thanks, Herb! I will wait to see of anyone with experience chimes in before I attempt any edits. Am I correct in assuming that I need to increase the "generic" value in dB if I want the display value
By Ed Wilson · #11199 ·
Re: Noise Figure measurement procedures for the tinySA ULTRA #ultra
Eric, I finally found the cause of the problem : The LNA was not oscillating but despite the 20dB attenuator it was still overloaded ! So I addad an extra 6dB attenuator and now I measure the
By Jos Stevens · #11198 ·
Re: Level Discrepancy Between 2 TinySA Ultras
Ed, If you type the command "correction" with the Ultra connected via a serial terminal (tinySA-App, PuTTY, etc) you will get the following response: correction usage: correction
By hwalker · #11197 ·
Re: Level Discrepancy Between 2 TinySA Ultras
Herb, I do not recall seeing information on editing the correction tables in the Wiki...can you point me to some documentation on the procedure? -- Ed, K0KC k0kc@... http://k0kc.us/
By Ed Wilson · #11196 ·
Re: Level Discrepancy Between 2 TinySA Ultras
Herb, Thanks for the idea! I will try to find time to do this later today or if not today, very soon. -- Ed, K0KC k0kc@... http://k0kc.us/
By Ed Wilson · #11195 ·
Re: Behavior of SPEEDUP feature #bug_report
Thanks Erik for your response. No need to spend time on this. Just wondered if the behavior is known or not. I also thought that the arithmetic (unsigned char) overflow is worth mentioning...
By @SleepingCat · #11194 ·
Re: Behavior of SPEEDUP feature #bug_report
The SPEEDUP command is a very low level setting added for ultimate speed increase when in FAST mode It has not yet been designed for ease of use so the behavior is weird The FAST and SPEEDUP work well
By Erik Kaashoek · #11193 ·
Re: Behavior of SPEEDUP feature #bug_report
Any comment on this? Even though not very major...
By @SleepingCat · #11192 ·
Re: Setting the Date/time on a New Tiny SA Ultra
How did you try to set the date? -- For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #11191 ·
Re: Selftest failure and part #'s
There are currently no clones of the Ultra and all stores listed in "where to buy"? are safe to buy from -- For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #11190 ·
Setting the Date/time on a New Tiny SA Ultra
Hello one and all. Received my Tiny SA Ultra the other day and did a first use cal and everything worked fine. However, I noticed that the date is listed as 2020/12/04. I was able to set time with no
By mjavit01 · #11189 ·
Selftest failure and part #'s
Pending any comments to the contrary, I am about to order some parts for for my TinySA Ultra(great machine, by the way, tnx! ) As179-92 switch BGA2817 LNA It is failing test #13 and getting an error
By ve6ars Ross · #11188 ·
Re: "CALIBRATE above 5.34GHz" throws a "Signal level too low or not on frequency" error #bug_report
I did this to see how it works but I used a mini circuits VHF2700+ high pass filter. That suppresses the fundamental and doesn't cause overload if you have to increase the level because your harmonic
By John Cunliffe W7ZQ · #11187 ·
Re: New FW release: Bug solved: Negative frequencies in markers
I've tested both versions: V1.4081,2 using from startup, center @ 433KHz, span @ 1.732MHz, shift frequency @ 0. They seem to do the same; positive side has 1 decimal point number, while negative side
By Colin de Jager · #11186 ·