开云体育

Jim, That is how it starts... Good luck! :) 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical

Thanks. The supplier was R&L. They’re good people, I’ll contact them. Unfortunately this will be the second exchange, because the first one had display problems (dark spots on the right side of

It does look like we made it, but the attenuator is broken, we suggest you contact your supplier for a new tinySA. we will provide the supplier with a new tinySA host.

I'm not cheap, I'm frugal. :) Besides, I bought one of the first run pre-order units directly. Definitely not a clone. 73 -Jim NU0C "Dave (NK7Z)" <dave@...> wrote:

Front and PCB: [A picture containing text, indoor, microwave, electronics Description automatically generated] [A picture containing text Description automatically generated] From:

Can you provide further pictures of the front and internal PCB?

My TinySA doesn't do the attenuator test. All other tests pass OK. Older versions work fine. Bobby/N4AU

Hi, Here is a photo of the back of the unit, and of the failure. [A picture containing text, plaque Description automatically generated] [A picture containing text, clock, electronics, display

Can you provide?the pictures of the back and the failed self-test?

I upgraded, ran the self-test, and got an “attenuator fail”. Ran the self-test more than once. From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> on behalf of "Roger Need via groups.io"

Try updating the firmware and running the self-test.? Clones will fail. Roger

Hi – I just received a TinySA from a vendor listed as legit. On the back of the unit, for the serial number, is just says “SA-“ and then nothing after that. Just checking to make sure that

We have a TV/comms tower on the nearby hill with some nice bright red flashy lights scattered up it, helps stop the hairplanes bumping into it. They've also been known to sometimes attach powerful

Thanks! That is what I was looking for!

Not sure if this helps but, according to an app installed on my phone, anything above -90dBm is regarded as good, above -97dBm as marginal, above -102dBm as poor with -110dBm as the cut of as

Steve and all, You make a good point but... Antennas and feed systems don't have flashing lights, fancy colourful displays and knobs, plus the "Oh Wow" factor missing. John VE7KKQ

Hi Erik, The new FW update is okay as far as I can see. Calibration goes fine. Thanks, 73 Wim.

Just in case for quite reference. -80 dBW (dB) -50 dBm 10 nW -30 dBW (dB) 0 dBm 1 mW 0 dBW (dB) 30 dBm 1.000000 W

Well I was just wondering if anyone had measured theirs and whether it was considered a good signal. I am evaluating omni cell antennas for my Weboost for my camper van.

According to the Great Knowledge Base, the internet, -50dBm equates to 0.000000008 Watts, (1e-8). https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/power/dBm_to_Watt.html John VE7KKQ