开云体育

The new FW is better able to suppress spurious signals. All looks good That's a secret code I show so I can see what settings you were using for the measurement. T means Tracking, R means reference.

hi Eric, et al; I had recently purchased a TinySA with FW 1.3111.? I had noticed a weird anomaly with it while testing its sweep generation with my HP 8594E SA at high dBm.? I am not sure if this is

Doh!? Forgot to attach the images...

Yes - the antenna was connectd in both images - sorry if that wasn't clear. I took some time today and took equivalent pics in several configurations with both firmware versions, placed in roughly the

Reg, Sounds like an interesting project.? Be sure to post how things work out for you or if you run into any issues that Erik might consider addressing in the next tinySA version. Pretty much the onl

Ted, You have to take into consideration the purpose of the automatic Channel Power Measurement feature which is to measure the percentage of the total power in each band.? Since this measurement is

I've been sweeping the 40 m allocation from 7-7.3 MHz with a 3rd order Cauer filter I designed with Elsie for a Chinese Pixie 2 kit in the output line. With the filter all spurs are down 50 dB or

Hi Erik, as a further test, I turned off Channel Power and went to a normal spectral screen. As seen in the attached photo, all is now normal, the marker freq and levels are shown as well as the

Hi Erik, THX for the reply. The pix is of a channel power plot of part of a digital spectrum. The markers can be selected and show on the plot as normal i.e. peak search and variable. However, the

Look in the wiki specification page onder low output It's currently not possible to calculate and display the actual frequency -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA

Correct -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/

Do you have the small antenna connected? With the new FW, can you enable the cal output, connect to the low input and check the level? The signal at 96MHz with the old FW is probably an MCU spur that

Hello all, I am new to the TinySA community (just an amateur hobbyist), and recently ordered a TinySA from Amazon ("SDRGEEK").? I commented on a post that Erik made on youtube, and he stated that

Sorry Erik, I meant the marker values don't display on the screen. The icons do appear and can be set. -----------------------------------------From: "Ted Chesley" To: "[email protected]" Cc: Sent:

Erik, Just a quick question: I am assuming when using the Channel Power function and selecting markers, the markers do not display on the screen, as in the attached pix. . Am I correct? THX....Ted

Hi Erik! I wonder if it's possible to change the response from the tinySA when the unit is in generator mode and you send "frequencies" to the unit? The response no is "a bunch" of the same the same

lowest level is -76dBm, you will need 50dB external attenuation -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/

What's the lowest level you can achieve? Need to do some sensitivity (SINAD) testing of my HF receiver, so I'll need to be able to go all the way to -110dBm (uV or so). I have no problem adding

Look here:?https://tinysa.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.Mixer -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/

I was thinking in terms of synchronizing a 2nd tinySA as an external sweeper for mixer testing from the SA side. However, likely better to do it from a PC. Have Fun! Reg