¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Hello, where is the topic? 33pF capacitors modification description? I want to try to improve the spurious.
By Sandro.montana@... · #3146 ·
Re: White screen of death?
No idea. Suggest you contact your supplier ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #3145 ·
Re: White screen of death?
Well after 3 different computers, 5 different USB ports and 3 different USB cables, no luck.? Anything else to try? Rick W7RMS
By Rick Sherman · #3144 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Please notice the RBW I used in my screen grabs -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #3143 ·
Re: #specifications #specifications
The cal output is hard coupled to the TCXO. The correction factor is used only for the low and high input frequency calculations ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA
By Erik Kaashoek · #3142 ·
Re: #specifications #specifications
Erik, I measure my 30 MHz. cal output and it was 45 Hertz off.? So I measured the 10 MHz. cal output and it was 15 Hz. off.? I went to CONFIG/EXPERT CONFIG/MORE/CORRECT FREQUENCY and entered
By Roger Need · #3141 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Attached are 2 screenshots with firmware 86 and 88, no spurs. Installed 33pF capacitors some time ago. 73, Rudi DL5FA
By Rudi · #3140 ·
Re: #specifications #specifications
Sandro, Be aware the problem is not an offset but a resolution issue. The output frequencies are on a fixed grid. So the maximum error will always stay the same. The TCXO itself is rather accurate.
By Erik Kaashoek · #3139 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Thanks for the selftes 6 output. All confirm what I was hoping for. No more needed ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #3138 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Check if there is another device close by. Even a PC keyboard or mouse can cause problems -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #3137 ·
Re: #specifications #specifications
Hello Bruce, thank you for your table. When all the data are in the minus side, adjusting the 10MHz one? step lower(is the resolution), it is possible to reduce the error upper 400 MHz? 100 Hz or
By Sandro.montana@... · #3136 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Spoors at 25.432M and 9.688M
By DiSlord · #3135 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Hello Erik, selftest 6 ch> 0:?? 96.678M 1:?? 96.705M 2:?? 96.705M 3:?? 96.678M 4:?? 96.705M 5:?? 92.608M 6:?? 96.705M 7:?? 96.678M 8:?? 93.743M 9:?? 94.159M 10:??
By Rudi · #3134 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Hmm, i restore back to work after push CPU, look like bad soldering
By DiSlord · #3133 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Installed 33pF capacitors (long time ago) All test complete Command: selftest 6 ch> 0:? ?97.397M 1:? ?98.006M 2:? ?98.892M 3:? ?92.083M 4:? ?92.442M 5:? ?92.802M 6:? ?93.217M 7:?
By DiSlord · #3132 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Erik, I had already installed the recommended bypass capacitors on the pcb to knock down the 48MHz spurs.? With the new v1.1-88 FW,?I saw further improvement.? I would suggest anyone considering
By hwalker · #3131 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Selftest 6 is? only available in v1.1-88 and only relevant after upgrading to v1.1-88 -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By Erik Kaashoek · #3130 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
One user reported a small selftest failure starting after upgrading to v1.1-88 This failure can not be caused by the upgrade to v1.1-88 but the coincidence is a bit worrying. All that upgrade to
By Erik Kaashoek · #3129 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
Erik, I ca not seem to get seftest 6 to work. Using the console command interface it says the correct syntax is: selftest (1-3) [arg]. I am on 1.1-85 Gary
By Gary W9TD · #3128 ·
Re: New FW release: Reduced CPU clock spurs and scanraw progress bar
my list is: 12:??? 96.484M 13:??? 95.211M 14:??? 95.626M 15:??? 95.958M 16:??? 96.373M 17:??? 96.705M 18:??? 97.093M 19:??? 97.397M 20:???
By Sven Hegewisch · #3127 ·