开云体育

Is there any future plan to drop the minimum signal level output available below -115 dbm? This would be more useful for receiver sensitivity testing since most radios levels are around -117 dbm to

passed selft test, updated to newest fw

According to tinysa.org banggood removed tinysa trademark and now is selling only clones. But now, there is only one option for tinysa different models to buy and all of them has tinysa trademark and

Topic closed -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

I have and use an 8556 in the 852 mainframe. Didn't know it is BWO based. The lowest range which tops out at 3 GHz is pretty clean. The other ranges are the problem. And, yes, the "ID" button for use

I had an old HP 856/8556 BWO-based spectrum analyzer at my first job, in 1975.? It, like all of the old non-preselected analyzers, had plentiful images and mixing products. It had a Signal Identifier

I have a Polarad. Haven't used it in years. No room for it on the bench. It was my first SA "W0LEV via groups.io" <davearea51a@...> wrote: -- 73 -Jim NU0C

Very pleased to say I went to grab a copy of the 175 bin file which was the one thatI had trouble with, and there was the 199 bin file (wasn't there before)which loaded perfectly (using StmCube) with

I would welcome someone looking at the code and suggesting better ways to remove spurs and mirrors Shifting the IF is already done. -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to

Do any of the readers of this group remember the original Polrad spectrum analyzers? Those were my introduction to spectrum analyzers. When you tuned them looking for your signal, there were copious

Did I read it? Oh, yes, but that was the first day I bought this device, was in a hurry to use it, and forgot about it, like about the fine print. My mistake! After I posted my message, I did a deeper

John, Can you explain for those that are less knowledgeable? -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

High pass filters are your friend when measuring in ultra mode.

Correct -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

So assuming I muffed that first update I should be able to update to that version. If not then I should consider this a clone and work on getting a refund? Sound about right? Appreciate the

Thanks but I am not confident to do this. The self test fails with the message: Test 3:? Signal level Fail 30.000MHz -74.7 dBm The spectrum analyser is working fine.

All FW should be backward compatible for all genuine HW. Don't know about clones -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

You could use a Raspberry Pi and the cli tool I've written for the tinySA: https://github.com/kkettinger/tsactl A simple bash script that loops over a frequency range and exports the traces with

As an update to this I downloaded an older file from around the manufacture date and it's back working again making squiggly lines. So that's a positive. So if I try to update can I expect it to