Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Close Rick. I've been using it regularly since January 2023 but have no idea when I last ran a SelfTest or LevelCal until after I updated the F/W yesterday.
By
Mike Miller
·
#15685
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Ooohhh, Jan '23? Sounds as though you're pretty much stuck with this puppy. You bought the TinySA, it waited for you to put it to work, you decided to install the latest and greatest f/w before
By
Richard B. Emerson
·
#15684
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Regarding Hugen's question: The only source I have that could overload the TinySA is my HP8643A which is capable of 19.9 dBm, so it is possible that I accidentally overloaded it with a 20dBm signal.
By
Mike Miller
·
#15683
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Hi all and thanks for the suggestions. I did a Clear Config and restest - no change. I did buy it from R&L January 2023, so doubtful a clone. I did NOT do a SelfTest right before updating firmware, so
By
Mike Miller
·
#15682
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Can you provide pictures of other test failed items? SelfTest?3, 4, 14£¿?It is possible that the RF switch and LNA on the port have been damaged, have you input a signal that exceeds the limits?
By
Hugen
·
#15681
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Good advice - wish I'd thought of it. ;) BTW, Mike, did you do a self-test and calibration before updating the firmware? If you did, and the device passed, then the f/w update becomes suspect. If
By
Richard B. Emerson
·
#15680
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Make sure battery is fully charged. Do Clear Config. Do Level Cal. Try self test again and report back. 73 -Jim NU0C "Mike Miller" <audiobymiller@...> wrote: -- 73 -Jim NU0C
By
Jim Shorney
·
#15679
·
|
Re: TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
At first blush, the symptoms suggest you have a clone. Please post one more photo, of the version page. Between the two case photos and the version page, Erik should be able to sort out clone/not
By
Richard B. Emerson
·
#15678
·
|
Re: To be or not to be, Genuine
Mike, there IS a "Definitive means" to identify bogus devices, but it has to remain classified to protect the design(er) of the copyright device. It may be impractical to post the requested photos
By
David Reed
·
#15677
·
|
TinySA Ultra SelfTest and Level Cal fail after firmware update
Hoping I'm doing something wrong, but my TinySA Ultra is not passing SelfTest or LevelCal. I just updated the firmware yesterday without problem to v1.4-156-g4eb315d, and then ran a SelfTest and
By
Mike Miller
·
#15676
·
|
Re: Excel macro to convert TinySA CSV files to WWB and IAS on Mac OS
#TinySA-App
#csv
It's a Honor receiving a message from you Erik! I hope the fw solves the compatibily por sound technicians like me... (I have the standard model) You are doing an awesome work for the community and
By
Maik
·
#15675
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
Sorry Andy, but I don't completely agree. Most current digital TV's don't use old style tuners any more, and even when they did, they were susceptible to overload from nearby RF sources. FM broadcast
By
Martin
·
#15674
·
|
Re: Excel macro to convert TinySA CSV files to WWB and IAS on Mac OS
#TinySA-App
#csv
The latest Fw may no longer need this converter as I changed output format -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#15673
·
|
Re: Excel macro to convert TinySA CSV files to WWB and IAS on Mac OS
#TinySA-App
#csv
Hi Maik, If you've got a windows PC : https://github.com/bradbbot/TinySAforRFguys/tree/main/TinySA4RFDialog TinySA CSV Convertor for Wireless Workbench and IAS By Brad Baisley with contribution from
By
Simon Touaux
·
#15672
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
FCC and the EU actually mandated the use of SMPSU's (exemptions provided if the PSU is external), not that anyone bothers, you still buy laptops etc with external in line smpsu's. China didn't enforce
By
Andy G0FTD
·
#15671
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
That is, a new expense awaits me...
By
Krzysztof
·
#15670
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
That's correct.? Plus, the Ultra version has a selectable pre-amp which you will most likely need to make measurements to the CISPR radiated limits. Herb
By
hwalker
·
#15669
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
I agree about the Boafengs being a few dB over the radiated limits. So what.....???!!! And that's measured into a good 50-ohm system. How do they perform when connected to the included rubber duck
By
W0LEV
·
#15668
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
And despite all these regs, from CENELEC to EU directives nothing has ever changed. TV receivers without a single part of front end filtering, FM b/cast receivers still using sqush bucket regens, PC
By
Andy G0FTD
·
#15667
·
|
Re: CISPR Resolution Bandwidths and low cost calibrated Antenna
Yes, I know that, but the RBW 200Hz is probably only available in the ULTRA version? I have built a TEM-CELL based on the TBCT1 dimensions from TEKBOX and am slowly trying to measure something on it.
By
Krzysztof
·
#15666
·
|