Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
And don't forget the DC Block, particularly if working on tube (valve) equipment.
Cheers...Bob VK2ZRE
By
Bob Ecclestone
·
#14968
·
|
Re: tinySA Ultra firmware upgrade
#ultra
And maybe I have the wrong bin file.
By
phyzxengr@...
·
#14967
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Hi Martin,
You are absolutely correct. I thought about it a bit more pretty much as soon as I pressed "send'.
I have now extracted my foot from my mouth and have put my teeth back in:-)
Firstly,
By
Bob Ecclestone
·
#14966
·
|
Re: tinySA Ultra firmware upgrade
#ultra
OR actually I am in the tinysa
http://athome.kaashoek.com/tinySA4/DFU/
I need explicit instructions for the Ultra, please. The index site doesnt seem to have it.
By
phyzxengr@...
·
#14965
·
|
Re: tinySA Ultra firmware upgrade
#ultra
I have STM loaded and the current Ultra bin file.
It is safe to follow the TinySA update pdf or is there a TinySA Ultra update pdf?
By
phyzxengr@...
·
#14964
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
I would not put 1n4148 diodes in there, 2 of them anti parallel into 50 ohm is roughly +10dbm. While that not always destroy the TinySA it will be past safe limits. I would say 2 low capacity? diodes
By
John Cunliffe W7ZQ
·
#14963
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Hi Martin et al,
thanks very much for the information it’s very much appreciated, as I said my main worry was blowing up the output of the rf generator, the scope probe is definitely one I will try.
By
Amanda Hambidge
·
#14962
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
And another thing...
If you want to build your own passive probe, then using a series connected resistor and capacitor is a better option.
The principle is described on this
By
Martin
·
#14961
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
One other thing I forgot to mention.
You can use a X10 scope probe with a spectrum analyser and will obtain a similar level of attenuation.
This can be handy, for example, when tracing an RF signal
By
Martin
·
#14960
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Hi Bob,
Yes, I'd agree on these theoretical values, but a lot depends upon the probe construction and the load impedance, and I have successfully used this technique in practice for many
By
Martin
·
#14959
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Actually the figure is about -52.5dB. 9 MegOhm/50 Ohm divider.
10log(1.8 x 10minus5).
73...Bob VK2ZRE
By
Bob Ecclestone
·
#14958
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
+1 on the 10X scope probe. ?
By
Richard Misener - N7ZH
·
#14957
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
You will get about 20 to 30dB loss through a X10 probe, as they are designed for use with a high input impedance scope.
But if you are not bothered about the accuracy of the signal amplitude, it's a
By
Martin
·
#14956
·
|
Re: Signal Generator level output
You're right, please see Erik's comment ( "The minimum output level is -115dBm" ):
/g/tinysa/message/14395
And here's the start of this
By
Ho-Ro
·
#14955
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Hi Martin,
thanks for the reply, I never thought of the x10 scope Probe idea, I do have signal generators but it’s the time waiting for them to stabilise that can be a pain.
regards
Amanda
By
Amanda Hambidge
·
#14954
·
|
Re: Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Personally, I'd place an extra external attenuator on the generator output, and then use a DC blocking capacitor.
If you are not worried about absolute signal levels, then put something like a 1k ohm
By
Martin
·
#14953
·
|
Using the TinySA Ultra for fault finding
Hi all,
I’m considering using my TinySA Ultra as a signal generator to fault find a VHF SSB transceiver, I want a stable 10.7MHz signal that I can inject into the signal chain but I’m worried
By
Amanda Hambidge
·
#14952
·
|
Re: Signal Generator level output
AFAIK the fault was that the older FW versions allowed you to enter an illegal lower value output (-124dBm?) than the hardware can actually achieve. So with the older FW if you entered -124 you still
By
Prawlin
·
#14951
·
|
Re: Tiny SA Ultra for GNSS signal checking
Here’s an interesting paper on the topic -
https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=5389
-Charlie
By
W5CDT
·
#14950
·
|
Re: Signal Generator level output
See specifications in the tinySA Ultra Wiki.? The minimum output in the signal generator mode is depreciated to -115dBm.
"Output level selectable in 1dB steps between -115dBm and -19dBm"
Herb
By
hwalker
·
#14949
·
|