开云体育

Hello all. 1st post The last time I used a spectrum analyzer was way too many years ago. My main goal is to test a TV antenna for a specific frequency.? I just got my TinySA and did the self test and

I did replace the MC because it was not upgrading FW.

Andy, you are correct in all. As a consultant and doing only pre-compliance, there is no legal requirement for pedigreding the measurement equipment or the cranial matter between my ears. What I most

Erik, Since you are having such a productive run right now, I wonder if you would mind also looking at issue #72 ( https://github.com/erikkaashoek/tinySA/issues/72 ) , the uninterruptible "scanraw"

This is a known problem for which there is currently no solution For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/

Bob, Send me a PM and I will give you a rather lengthy reply as to my background in R&D and pre-compliance testing.? I've too spent a lot of time running to test facilities. When you say, "So you

I haven't found any irregularities working in Vpp ,Vrms, tested with 4? markers (3 of them delta between them). What I have observed is that while we are using linear units (W, Vrms or Vpp), when

Certification labs, like notaries, are big business

Hi Andy, You are obviously not an electronics design engineer where your design has to meet compliance standards. In a previous life I worked for a company designing and developing equipment for

Erik, You are amazing. Didn't anyone tell you it is Christmas and you can take a few days off! Thank you so much for everything you do for us! It really is VERY much appreciated. All the very best for

Dave, As always you are very knowledgeful and hands on with the equipment - something I've gotten away from over the past 40 years. Maybe I can pick your brain sometime if you don't mind. As a small

If you design a product tangent to the limits published by the regulatory agencies, your design, implementation, manufacturing, and sales model is sorely flawed. Dave - W?LEV -- *Dave - W?LEV*

But the tinySA (and Ultra variant) *is* capable of certain professional uses, such as site survey work for radio microphones & similar, as previously noted. Any comparatively cheap piece of equipment

I disagree, Andy. For precompliance, part selection, and initial design, these products are quite appropriate. I do pre-compliance as a small consulting business. Yes, I have the "big boy's"

The electronic industry is very dynamic. You can't guarantee that ex-HP ex-Keysight Agilent will be around in 10 years. Mike N2MS

From my prospective proper design and component testing is where you want the best equipment.? Why base your design with less accurate equipment than the product will be tested with during acceptance

The TinySA and Ultra are extremely useful tools for both initial design, part evaluations, and pre-compliance. However, yes, official testing for agency approval requires "petigreded" equipment. Dave

RE: Regulatory?Approval? It has been a long time since I was involved with such testing, but I believe that there is a requirement to list all test equipment used along?with Model,?Serial Number

Guy's, don't worry Those in the medical device field know what to ask for and the tinySA can not provide. But for non medical class of safety related manufacturing the tinySA can be a good tool. --

You are right, If only for Eric's protection. There should be a clear statement that this is a hobbyist product and that the responsibility for professional use is solely on the end user.Otherwise