开云体育

I haven't found any irregularities working in Vpp ,Vrms, tested with 4? markers (3 of them delta between them). What I have observed is that while we are using linear units (W, Vrms or Vpp), when

Certification labs, like notaries, are big business

Hi Andy, You are obviously not an electronics design engineer where your design has to meet compliance standards. In a previous life I worked for a company designing and developing equipment for

Erik, You are amazing. Didn't anyone tell you it is Christmas and you can take a few days off! Thank you so much for everything you do for us! It really is VERY much appreciated. All the very best for

Dave, As always you are very knowledgeful and hands on with the equipment - something I've gotten away from over the past 40 years. Maybe I can pick your brain sometime if you don't mind. As a small

If you design a product tangent to the limits published by the regulatory agencies, your design, implementation, manufacturing, and sales model is sorely flawed. Dave - W?LEV -- *Dave - W?LEV*

But the tinySA (and Ultra variant) *is* capable of certain professional uses, such as site survey work for radio microphones & similar, as previously noted. Any comparatively cheap piece of equipment

I disagree, Andy. For precompliance, part selection, and initial design, these products are quite appropriate. I do pre-compliance as a small consulting business. Yes, I have the "big boy's"

The electronic industry is very dynamic. You can't guarantee that ex-HP ex-Keysight Agilent will be around in 10 years. Mike N2MS

From my prospective proper design and component testing is where you want the best equipment.? Why base your design with less accurate equipment than the product will be tested with during acceptance

The TinySA and Ultra are extremely useful tools for both initial design, part evaluations, and pre-compliance. However, yes, official testing for agency approval requires "petigreded" equipment. Dave

RE: Regulatory?Approval? It has been a long time since I was involved with such testing, but I believe that there is a requirement to list all test equipment used along?with Model,?Serial Number

Guy's, don't worry Those in the medical device field know what to ask for and the tinySA can not provide. But for non medical class of safety related manufacturing the tinySA can be a good tool. --

You are right, If only for Eric's protection. There should be a clear statement that this is a hobbyist product and that the responsibility for professional use is solely on the end user.Otherwise

QUOTE: I dont mind buying new ones as long as they will still be available and supported without going obsolete. This is one of my concerns as well, but not for your reasons. Both the TinySA's and the

Erik, having the possibility to execute the save command (menu 9 6) on a command file (*.CMD) from SDcard, you would only need the wait command to cause a wait before executing it. Perhaps creating

Martin, My wife has worked as a RN for over 35 years.? I have to agree on the safety of life issue - I wouldn't rule out a medical malpractice case dragging the validity of use issue into a

Can you connect the cal output to a scope and enable the cal output and see if there is some output. When you connect the antenna to the RF input, do you see some transmitters? -- For more info on the

You did replaced the microcontroller?? Why? The 1.4-133 is the latest... Istvan

This rings all sorts of alarm bells with me. The TinySA is fine to assist with training, design verification and to a certain extent pre-compliance testing, but it can not in any way be considered to