开云体育

Thanks Herb, I think a lot of people are attempting to use too much 'pixie-dust' and can't see the forest through the trees. We should realize the tinySA Ultra or variant, is just a VERY fantastic,

It would have been nice if he had announced in the original thread he started about his firmware update problem that the problem had been solved.? You know, like how he wanted all the files in one

If your measurement can stand the loss of sensitivity, then using an attenuator as a possible sacrificial element certainly works. Some frequency domain measurements are performed on low level

I believe in the "KISS" method. Instead of trying to jump through all these 'protection' hoops, wouldn't it be easier to just go ahead and use a simple 'pad' (20db, 30db, pick your poison)? Mike C.

It would be better to search for "Littelfuse". Easy mistake to make. For years I saw Littlefuse every time I looked at Littelfuse. 73 -Jim NU0C "JerryP" <jponko@...> wrote:

When referring to an item being "junk", it would be nice if you identified that "junk" so as the rest of us would be privy to the true ID of said item. Thanks. Mike C. Sand Mtn GA

The OP has solved his firmware update problem.... Vitaliy seems to have vanished after he got his problem fixed last week and was able to fix his problem. He posted about it in a topic I started

I'm not sure that Vitaliy's problem is simply "driver not found."? He has some concern - apparently justified - that installing the driver in Windows will cause other problems in his system.? When

On Apr 5, 2023, at 3:56 AM, Toni Ciscar <aciscar@...> wrote: ? The Ultra has arrived from Zeenko in ten days (with FW TinySA4_v1.4-49). It is amazing, thanks Erik, and I am very happy because

These are not suitable for protecting a Spectrum Analyzer or any Radio Receiver.? I bought one a few months ago and tested it.? It is junk... and that my friends is a very polite description of the

The Ultra has arrived from Zeenko in ten days (with FW TinySA4_v1.4-49). It is amazing, thanks Erik, and I am very happy because it has connected directly to the same programs I use for the

When I look at the specs (these seem to differ a lot from the earlier mentioned 0.05pF and 5V max.? used in the tinySA Ultra kind regards, Hugo

A signal input of +20dBm, without upfront attenuation, will quickly damage your tinySA Ultra. Without attenuation it is specified to withstand +6dBm. Before the tinySA's were available for purchase,

To be fair the only thing that is not as advertised is the use of Shotkky rather than PIN diodes. The advert does state 10MHz to 6GHz and a max i/p of +20dBm. That spec makes it pretty redundant in

You might want to try using a TVS diode like this for protecting SDRs and the TinySA: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/littelfuse-inc/SP00R6-01WTG/15849687 Yes, they're tiny but you can

These are not suitable for protecting a Spectrum Analyzer or any Radio Receiver.? I bought one a few months ago and tested it.? It is junk...? Read my analysis at the link

Hi Hugo I do not know the type of the diode, Erik is the one to ask. I have these impedance measurements amongst many hundred pages. When I locate them I will let you know Kind regards Kurt

To say it civil, they #^%%$$ .don't waste your money.

I would love to see external gain / loss setting i.e. external amplifier John

Hi Vladimir, My system is working fine but a year ago I had the problem similar to Vitaliy.? The problem was that the original path was too deep and Windows blew right past it while looking for