Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Tinysa
- Messages
Search
RADIATED EMISSIONS FROM TINYSA-ULTRA
The question regarding radiated emissions from the TinySA - Ultra originated over on the NanoVNA users group.? I have three (don't ask) TinySA Ultras.? I checked all three employing the identical setup I used to evaluate radiated emissions from the NanoVNAs (nothing on the electronic work bench has changed in the intervening 2-days).? Please refer to the "ADDEMDUM" posting on the NanoVNA-users groupio in that regard for setup. I'm happy to report, with that setup identical to my evaluation of REs from the NanoVNAs, the TinySA - Ultras (at least the three I own - don't ask) are squeaky clean and exhibit absolute minimal radiated emissions.? Even though they are not required to pass Part 15 of the FCC rules (as test equipment, they are subject to Part 18 which is considerably more liberal), I'm sure they would pass with flying colors. Again, this quick evaluation of RE from the TinySA - Ultras in no way, shape, or manner, intentional or unintentional, reflects anything to address regulatory RE levels. ? Dave - W?LEV |
Re: TinySA Ultra generates signals while sweeping
Any tests of the TinySAs will be posted on that dedicated site, not here.l Dave - W?LEV On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:27?PM W0LEV via <davearea51a=[email protected]> wrote:
-- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: TinySA Ultra generates signals while sweeping
Take a visit to the McGeevy site.? The following should get you going: ???? There's also a link at the very bottom that is of interest. We are addressing electromagnetic energy at AUDIO frequencies.? Some may even be detected by connecting a long wire or loop to the sound input to any PC or laptop. Dave - W?LEV On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 4:21?PM Bruce Hawkins via <ac6dn=[email protected]> wrote:
-- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: Display replacement
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:08 AM, <GamzeeMakara2000@...> wrote:
7 inches?? If you are referring to the LiteVNA64 then go to /g/nanovna-beta-test/ subscribe to the group and search the message base for "Test 7 inch screen". ? If you are referring to the tinySA Ultra, then see Stan Dye's reply at /g/tinysa/message/16968? Herb |
Re: Display replacement
7" is still experimental,? requires significant hardware technical skills to install on litevna64.? Only one person has done it that I am aware of,? in? nanovna-beta group. On Thu, Jun 6, 2024, 11:08 AM GamzeeMakara2000 via <GamzeeMakara2000=[email protected]> wrote: 7 inches? |
Re: TinySA Ultra generates signals while sweeping
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 04:21 PM, Bruce Hawkins wrote:
But they go quite low. The next real problem is the antenna. For the SA or the HF receiver (30, 100kHz is not uncommon).Most of the PA0RDT type E-Probe antennas will work down to at least 10kHz, but noise and interference is a problem in Urban environments. If you are really keen, you can try to hear the Earth's Shumann resonances at around 7, 14 and 20Hz, YES, I did mean Hz. These folks mange to do it. Regards, Martin |
Re: TinySA Ultra generates signals while sweeping
Bruce Hawkins
Hi Dave, Some people are actually sensitive to RF. But it usually, Watts's of power. Not necessarily meant to be a joke. Bruce Hawkins AC6DN On Monday, June 3, 2024 at 02:16:06 PM CDT, W0LEV <davearea51a@...> wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:22?PM Sam Reaves via <sam.reaves=[email protected]> wrote:
-- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: TinySA Ultra generates signals while sweeping
Bruce Hawkins
A lot of my HF HAM radios work down there. But there specs aren't guaranteed. I've never tested them down there as well. But they go quite low. The next real problem is the antenna. For the SA or the HF receiver (30, 100kHz is not uncommon). Bruce Hawkins AC6DN On Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 09:48:30 AM CDT, Matt Harris <kd4pbs@...> wrote: ?On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 08:02 PM, vbifyz wrote: I attribute some of my eye and skin damage to it, confirmed by doctors. Talk about horrors. Now that I have had a day (and morning coffee) I see that?I am the one who also didn't detect the sarcasm font ;)? Ha!? Thanks, Mike! On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 11:29 AM, Bruce Hawkins wrote: big radio noises heard coming from Earth. This info about the VLF signals is interesting.? Too bad the TinySA is virtually deaf at these frequencies, but understandably; a highly sensitive and selective VLF/ULF receiver is oddly difficult (read "expen$ive) to create. |
Re: Display replacement
For the similar nanovna, each different screen size requires different firmware modifications - they have done the 2.8", 4", and recently adapted a 7" display to the newer litevna.? So it is highly unlikely that there is any plug-n-play larger screen for the tinySA.? On Thu, Jun 6, 2024, 9:31 AM m0cnl via <m1cxz.m0cnl=[email protected]> wrote: Just had the thought that maybe if the display uses spi, then something designed for an arduino or raspberry pi could be used. |
Re: VBW influence
I have viewed the VBW as a post-detection "filter" or smoothing function.? A possible example might be a receiver with a tone control.? That control works only on the demodulated audio.? When rotated to suppress higher frequencies, it "filters" or smoothes the high frequencies such that the resulting audio is now lacking much of the higher frequencies.? As such, if one displayed the result on an o'scope, it would look smoother with less high-frequency (audio) spikes.? Look at the VBW as a smoothing or somewhat of a averaging function operating only at audio frequencies. Dave - W?LEV ? ? On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:44?AM scnuzmj via <scnuzmj=[email protected]> wrote: Hi expert -- Dave - W?LEV |
Display replacement
First of all, I want to thank Eric for his work and creating this device! Thank you! I actively use it in my creations and in teaching. TNX! |
Re: Attenuator needed for my purpose?
Well, that's very cool, Dave!? I have indeed worked on many of the models of transmitters and receivers over the past 30 years that company has produced.? Anything rugged enough to mostly survive "normal use" from a TV news anchor or videographer for more than a year is a notable piece of equipment in my book, so thanks for your contributions!
|
VBW influence
Hi expert
I have confusion about the infulence of VBW, in my knowledge, according to the block diagram of the spectrum analyzer, when VBW > RBW, the bandwidth of VBW will great than the video signal(limited by RBW), so the video filter will not filter the video signal, then the change of VBW(still great than RBW) should not affect the smooth effect of the trace. But the actual display is not suitable for this guess, I think I must miss something about video filter. So, pls help! any explanations are welcome£¡ |