Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Tinysa
- Messages
Search
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
开云体育Roger, ? Thanks for the tip.? I ran the attenuator test and I’m definitely getting the steps, so there’s no doubt that the attenuator has failed. ? The attenuator chip in my TinySA is a PE4302.? It’s now obsolete; however, the drop-in replacement is a PE4312.? And the PE4312 is out of stock everywhere, with very long lead times.? I guess it’s a victim of the global chip shortage.? There are sellers on eBay that claim to have the PE4302.? Weighing the options.? I have a well-stocked workbench and a huge lighted magnifying glass on a swing-arm – I might just go ahead and replace it. ? Steve, KW4H ? From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> on behalf of "Roger Need via groups.io" <sailtamarack@...> ? On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 02:36 PM, Steven Reed wrote:
You can check the attenuator for damage by running an extensive attenuator test.? You should get a flat green line.? If it has steps in it one or more sections of the attenuator have failed.? If you are handy with a hot air gun you can
replace the attenuator. |
Re: Question
@Dave:
As I happen to use, just by chance,?a white tip variant of the pen which Erik uses I think I recognise it as a Papermate 0.7 mm Non-Stop Mechanical Pencil. For you these maybe the easiest and cheapest to buy from the UK store as it looks an "international" variant of the Paper Mate: The white tip variant is called a Paper Mate Sharpwriter and can be purchased in smaller quantities: ? So far for the "real stuff", as opposed to the, probably much better, touchy recommendations from Karl Jan (I myself at least managed to destroy my mechanical pencil during an internal investigation, most likely not by ESD but due to overloading). ? What actually made me react on the topic is the point that this "Question" in itself shows that Erik is becoming a real star influencer on this forum. Really hope he and we all benefit from this, because his tinySA is marvelous. BenS |
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 02:36 PM, Steven Reed wrote:
You can check the attenuator for damage by running an extensive attenuator test.? You should get a flat green line.? If it has steps in it one or more sections of the attenuator have failed.? If you are handy with a hot air gun you can replace the attenuator. Roger |
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
开云体育Well, I didn’t plug the TinySA into anything directly (it never touched a live circuit or an RF output) – however, the only thing I can surmise is that the signal coming from the receiver’s RF oscillator and through the external whip antenna might have been too much for the TinySA.? It’s not a situation where I would have thought an attenuator would have been necessary, but nevertheless I have to admit fault where fault is due – an attenuator was not used.? I’ve ordered another TinySA, and will use the current one as a signal generator.? Eventually, I wanted two of these, anyway.? ? So, a question for you Erik.? Other than failing the attenuator self-test, the TinySA is calibrating, receiving signals, and otherwise seems to be working.? With the “Attenuator Fail” happening, what operations with the TinySA will no longer function correctly going forward?? It looks like I can still use it for some things. ? Steve, KW4H ? From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> on behalf of Erik Kaashoek <erik@...> ? Any external attenuator (even only 10dB) will help protect the tinySA ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/ |
Re: Question
开云体育Thank you.? Your videos are fabulous. ? Kind Regards, Dave Dave Reiser Phone: 301-216-5394 Mobile: 301-802-1929 Email:? davereiser2outlook.com 520 Russell Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877 ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
Karl Jan Skontorp
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [tinysa] Question ? ? or this one ? ? Karl |
Re: WARNING: Mirfield sold clones after they promised not to do so.
Kudos to Martin.
I emailed Martin at Mirfield Electronics on Monday about a problem I was having with the TinySA I had bought back in February. Less than an hour later he replied saying to send it to him for replacement. Posted it Monday and new unit arrived today, Thursday. I don't know if the first one was a clone but the new one came with hardware version V0.3.1_E and Serial number SA-21070275. Passed all self tests. Updated software to tinySA_v1.3-317-g9d82970 and again all self tests passed.?
Excellent service from Martin and I'll continue to purchase my amateur radio gear from him.
Colin
MM5AGM |
Question
开云体育Erik, I like the pen you use in your videos to touch the screen.? Where can I buy one like it? ? Kind Regards, Dave Dave Reiser Phone: 301-216-5394 Mobile: 301-802-1929 Email:? davereiser2outlook.com 520 Russell Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877 |
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
开云体育Full marks Erik...the TSA should always have an attenuated attached. ALIEXPRESS have good wide band attenuators available at around 5 or 6 USD. -------- Original message -------- From: Erik Kaashoek <erik@...> Date: 23/09/21 17:39 (GMT+12:00) Subject: Re: [tinysa] Attenuator Fail - Again Many SA users (small and big SA's) always keep an external attenuator attached. ------------------------------------------
For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
|
Firmware Update questions
Hello All,
I have a Tiny SA that was last updated February 3, 2021 and would like to install the latest stable update. It's hardware is V0.3... Can I just install the latest update, or do the updates have to be installed sequentially? Is there a master list of what the updates that have come out do or improve?? If so, where can this be found? What is the latest stable update? Does the Tiny SA come in a metal case for shielding? Thank you. --jeff |
Re: New video: September 2021 feature update
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sep 22, 2021, at 4:26 PM, Ted Chesley <tedchesley@...> wrote:
|
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
On eBay, I purchased an old HP step attenuator, 0 to 120db with a cutoff at 900MHz. Forty bucks. Used or retired brand name test equipment can be a good deal as long as the limitations are provided by the seller. John VE7KKQ On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:59 PM spiff72 <mgobluevictor@...> wrote:
|
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
Just curious - I bought these a while back (right after I got my tinySA):
|
Re: New video: September 2021 feature update
开云体育Hi Terry, wouldn’t surprise me if Erik is working on a new version 319, but 317 is the latest on the site and as you note, contains the new trace functions demonstrated in the video. Fingers crossed for a large screen version with wider bandwidth. This thing is really an amazing device at the price.…..Ted (KD7AQO) On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:09 PM, Terry Perdue <K8tp@...> wrote:
|
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
开云体育I’ve so far only used it with the external antenna on, measuring IF oscillator frequencies by waving the antenna near the oscillator tuning capacitor.? To my recollection, there’s been no chance for an overload. ? From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> on behalf of John Cunliffe W7ZQ <n2nep@...> ? The main reason for input attenuator failure on any spectrum analyzer is front end overload. Are you making sure you don't have too much power at the input? Not just the main signal but others within the bandwith combined. A fellow ham
blew out the attenuator of his TinySA checking a 2-30Mhz preamplifier that unfortunately had a spurious oscillation at 200Mhz producing nearly 150mw of signal. I always recommend the use of a power limiter similar to |
Re: Attenuator Fail - Again
The main reason for input attenuator failure on any spectrum analyzer is front end overload. Are you making sure you don't have too much power at the input? Not just the main signal but others within the bandwith combined. A fellow ham blew out the attenuator of his TinySA checking a 2-30Mhz preamplifier that unfortunately had a spurious oscillation at 200Mhz producing nearly 150mw of signal. I always recommend the use of a power limiter similar to
? unless people are absolute certain the combined signals between 100Kz and 350Mhz will not exceed the input capabilities of the instrument. John |