开云体育

Hi Erik My humble opinion is leave it as is. It is working very well with the AGC functions and serves the first time user best possible as he hardly need to know what he is doing ? I have both

Yep. There is a bug in loading the startup configuration

I saved a different setup in [store as startup]. When Tiny boots, for a moment we have the setup, then it defaults. You need [load startup] to recall the setup. Is this right? I tried to record it on

Thanks for the answer. I'm looking at the commands. I like to leave the settings saved in a txt file. When using "clearconfig", I restore the settings. Thank you again!! 73

Igor, Erik intended to include those commands in the final release but there was a deadline to get the tinySA into production, and so, those commands never made it.? The only way they can be

Yep. On a $1000.00 plus instrument it would be negligent if you didn't have that type of automatic protection built in.? I guess the same thing on the tinySA would reduce the number of "my tinySA is

Erik, I am testing the commands and have not resulted in the commands below: *trace {store | clear | subtract}* For these commands everything works fine: *trace {dBm | dBmV | dBuV | V | W}* *trace

Gary I have not done ANY testing on tinySA-saver. It is just a crude, incomplete hack to enable nanoVNA-saver to sweep with tinySA. Unfortunately tinySA-saver is low on my priority list, mostly

I found a good reason to have coupling if ref level is set to 20dB or higher The noise floor with the widest RBW is, with a ref level of 20dB just visible if attenuation is set to 10 dB So if a user

Seems whatever I try to do results in a "complex division by zero" error. Setting marker, clicking on trace... I am running it from the Anaconda prompt, and I get first error right after starting

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:49 AM, Jean-Roger Roy wrote: > > Erik, Herb > > From my return of experience with different spectrum analyzers : > > For old style / vintage equipment such a HP8558B,

For any attenuation applied the displayed level always reflects the level at the input , regardless of the applied attenuation

My 2 cents: if manual attenuation is selected the IF gain should compensate so the reference level stays the same. Gary W9TD

For a first time user, would it be better to have coupled (e.g starting attenuation level) equal to refelevel if reflevel >= 0? Or should it be better to go to coupled mode if the reflevel is manually

Older analyzers such as those in the HP141 mainframe had uncoupled rf attenuation and IF gain since they were in separate plugins. The display reference level did read correctly whatever combination

I forgot, will do, see todo list in this groups wiki

Erik, Herb From my return of experience with different spectrum analyzers : For old style / vintage equipment such a HP8558B, the reference level rotating button is mechanically coupled with the

Erik, On commercial spectrum analyzers I have used there is a coupled and uncoupled mode.? When operating in the coupled mode, changes in reference leve

Erik, The new v1.0-61 peak marker function is working very well, as is the level action for positioning the marker.? I tested all 4 markers with display sweeping and paused and had no issues. The

Thank you!! ================================================