#feature_request
#feature_request
Erik I was just wondering if possible a noise source could be produced from the Cal output to connect through a dut to look at its spectrum? - even if a bit rough, just to get an idea regards Colin
By
Colin de Jager
·
#9780
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
Here some more alternatives of this 18Ghz, blue, "flexible", solid middle conductor cable, at an affordable price; https://mouser.com/datasheet/2/18/1/Amphenol_TFlex_405-1948019.pdf
By
Istv¨¢n
·
#9779
·
|
Re: Signal level too low
#ultra
Well, courier came with the parts today and replaced the RF switch (marked S79 instead of A79). Everything is working again. Thank you for the guidance, Erik!
By
sigxcpu@...
·
#9778
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
Yes, the cable diameter already meets this production tolerance given by them. I'am not read the chinese characters; - here looks missing the jacket, from the dimension list...
By
Istv¨¢n
·
#9777
·
|
Re: Problem selftest 7 TinySA Ultra
#ultra
Thank you Erik for the quick reply. ?I'm glad it's nothing serious. ?Overall, I am very happy with this analyzer.? Tomasz
By
Tomasz Rydz
·
#9776
·
|
Re: TinySA-App CSV Export Bug
#ultra
#TinySA-App
#bug_report
#csv
Still hoping to get this bug resolved. To make this even more confusing to figure out, this error is not a simple percentage applied to all amplitudes.? Referring to the example in my previous post:
By
Jason Glass
·
#9775
·
|
Re: Problem selftest 7 TinySA Ultra
#ultra
We are still tuning the criteria for the flatness. The important part of the pass band, the left side, is good, the criteria for the right side may be a bit too strict. No need to worry, the next FW
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#9774
·
|
Problem selftest 7 TinySA Ultra
#ultra
Hi I have TinySA ultra but unfortunately it does not pass its selftest 7. You can see that the filter does not have flat characteristics. ?Is this a serious error? ?The device was purchased from the
By
Tomasz Rydz
·
#9773
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
Istavan, You might want to look at the data for SS405 from this vendor. It seems to be very close to what you are seeing and what is shipped with the liteVNA 64 I just received.
By
John Cunliffe W7ZQ
·
#9772
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
- LMR100 cable, and I can measure a diameter of 2.8 mm on it; as I can see on the data sheet... The blue one is exactly 3 mm in diameter, not 2.65 mm! and looks little bit more flexible like LMR100
By
Istv¨¢n
·
#9770
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
Hi, A lot of information has been shaken out of the bushes in this thread. I have always been a "forty meter ham" and I get dizzy if I exceed 30MHz! Checking harmonic content at *my* frequencies seems
By
Bill Cromwell
·
#9769
·
|
Re: #feature_request
#feature_request
Erik, Thank you! With best regards,
By
Ctoyan Dombarov
·
#9768
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
I think most miss the point, Hugen clearly stated at the begin of this thread that the delivered cable is a Chinese version of LMR100. John
By
John Cunliffe W7ZQ
·
#9767
·
|
Re: #feature_request
#feature_request
WIll have a look if this will fit in available memory. The functionality is already implemented for the tinySA Ultra -- For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#9766
·
|
Re: #feature_request
#feature_request
Input levels are +/- 0.5 dBm relatively 30 M for all that freq, 10k including.
By
Ctoyan Dombarov
·
#9765
·
|
Re: #feature_request
#feature_request
@-25dBm: Freq.??? Level, dBm relatively 30M 10k?????? +6.6 100k???? +1.8 200k???? +1.5 500k???? +2 30M ? ???? 0 140M???? +0.4 200M???? +0.8 300M???? +0.3
By
Ctoyan Dombarov
·
#9764
·
|
Re: Relative to Erik's tinyFPA, doe the nanoVNA H4 version mater?
I ordered mine from eleshop.nl. As always, no problems. All the Best, Isidro Am 22.01.2023 um 15:41 schrieb Lawrance A. Schneider:
By
Isidro Berniol
·
#9763
·
|
Re: question about cable shipped with TinySA Ultra
Hello, this cables aren't compareable at all. The RG316 is a cable for flexible use. The SS405 is a cable to have a more flexible alternative to the corresponding semirigid cables. The SS405 will last
By
Isidro Berniol
·
#9762
·
|
Re: Relative to Erik's tinyFPA, doe the nanoVNA H4 version mater?
Yes, I would buy for R&L. ?In fact, I just ordered it! Thank you for your reply. larry
By
Lawrance A. Schneider
·
#9761
·
|
Re: #feature_request
#feature_request
What error in the output levels versus frequency did you observe? -- For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#9760
·
|