Re: Oscilloscope needed if I have TinySA and NanovVNA?
The textronix definitely has the old school cool factor. I have the 1202X-E and frankly it's pretty good. It's not as hackable as the Rigol scopes, but frankly you can't go wrong with it. Though if I
By
Rob L
·
#8670
·
|
Oscilloscope needed if I have TinySA and NanovVNA?
I'm just getting started in the hobby of experimenting with RF devices. I already have a NanoVNA and a TinySA Ultra (not out of the box yet though). In setting up my radio bench, what do you experts
By
Steve Johnson
·
#8669
·
|
Re: Signal Generator Frequency Calibration
#ultra
Thanks.? I saw Level Cal but clearly different.
By
Wes Stewart
·
#8668
·
|
Re: tg
To avoid reverse leaking it is necessary to have at minimum 80dB reverse isolation between LO output and mixer input. This is usually realized? with at minimum 2 20dB amps, a 20dB attenuator at the
By
Isidro Berniol
·
#8667
·
|
Re: A round of applause!
AGREED!? Fantastic piece of equipment, both of them.? The ULTRA is great and filled with features I never thought possible! Thanks Erik! Rich
By
K3RWN
·
#8666
·
|
Re: A round of applause!
SO SAY ALL-OF-US!!!!
By
George Dukish <georgedukish@...>
·
#8665
·
|
and a small discone antenna
To be able to " sniff " out higher frequencies we built a small discone antenna, works from 2 gHz and is non obtrusive enough. The top disk diameter is 30 mm and the length of the skirt is 40 mm
By
THE BOSS
·
#8664
·
|
Re: A round of applause!
Applause is not enough! Thank you Erik! I might also humbly suggest that those who buy this as a cheap new toy to play with their hobby, that you please FIRST: 1) READ THE WIKI, 2) Instructions /
By
Imre Csaszar
·
#8663
·
|
Re: A round of applause!
Agreed, I remember using an HP SA nearly 50 years ago and they were way way out of reach of the man in the street. I think this is amazing. When the dust settles I may update the firmware etc. but as
By
ANDY NEHAN
·
#8662
·
|
Re: TinySA High Output??
Rich, Is it possible you turned on the LO Output option?? (It is in the CONFIG/EXPERT CONFIG menu). With LO Output enabled I get about 10dBm of Local Oscillator at the HIGH connector.? With it
By
John Gord
·
#8661
·
|
A round of applause!
Guys can we have a round of applause for Eric and the team who have managed to produce such a dandy device. I'm sure Eric would want feedback on things the development team would like to attend and
By
THE BOSS
·
#8660
·
|
Re: TinySA High Output??
Thanks, would it hurt to place a 50ohm terminator on the SMA to lower the level?
By
K3RWN
·
#8659
·
|
Re: Signal Generator Frequency Calibration
#ultra
Herb, Thank you for the "heads-up" regarding loss of the correction factor when a firmware update is executed. Ed, K0KC k0kc@... http://k0kc.us/
By
Ed Wilson
·
#8658
·
|
Re: tg
To save me a lot of time: I will not be able to provide any support to people that want to create a TG for the tinySA Ultra except to explain how to enable the LO output. If you do not understand how
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#8657
·
|
Re: TinySA High Output??
Correct. You leakage from the sweeping LO -- For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#8656
·
|
Re: tg
something like this: Opci¨®n de generador de seguimiento (groups.io) ( /g/tinysa/message/10 )
By
Toni Ciscar
·
#8655
·
|
TinySA High Output??
I noticed that when I have the original TinySA the LOW IN mode, the unit is outputting a random freq signal from the HIGH IN SMA. I am not exactly sure what it is, I have all of the OUTPUT settings
By
K3RWN
·
#8654
·
|
Re: New ULTRA FW release: improved touch defaults and marker->Ref level
Hello Martin, Could you please send me a link to your latest FW for the TinySA. I must have missed your notice of the update. Thank you, Clyde KC7BJE
By
Clyde Lambert
·
#8653
·
|
Re: New ULTRA FW release: improved touch defaults and marker->Ref level
Very nice, Thanks Erik
By
pe1hwo
·
#8652
·
|
Re: New ULTRA FW release: Improved font and touch cal
Same for me, with new touch cal process, the result is bad and not matching to the test cal point. A touch calibration offset is resulting with the new cal update. Was better and of course more
By
F1RVC
·
#8651
·
|