¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
If your views are dumb then you are doing it right. This means the only thing you views will define is the mapping between the UI events of the view and the logical events of the presenter and
By Amir Kolsky · #35560 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
[testdrivendevelopment] <testdrivendevelopment@...> wrote:
By Matteo Vaccari · #35559 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
That's what I'm trying out. I use KIF just a little, and call methods that events would be calling. Assert that output in text fields is correct. No mocks. Stub out one method in a fake UIButton. C.
By Keith Ray <keith.ray@...> · #35558 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
This sounds interesting. I didn't think a unit test (ala XCTest) for a specific view would actually fire up the view - but is that what you're thinking I should dig into - and then, assigning values
By Luther Baker · #35557 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
You do not need to know pixels. If you know the IDs you can access the widgets. This is still a unit test. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
By Amir Kolsky · #35556 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
Screenscrape? In iOS? I generally don't position things explicitly via pixels anymore - not with Autolayout so would be hard to tell exactly where something was to show up if I were writing the test
By Luther Baker · #35555 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Views - iOS
Can¡¯t you just screen scrape the views, given that they are supposed to drive the screen? Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 6:23 PM To: testdrivendevelopment@... Subject: [TDD] Testing Views -
By Amir Kolsky · #35554 ·
Testing Views - iOS
I've essentially broken my GUI logic out into a rough MVP pattern and while I find testing the Models and Presenters straightforward, I haven't come up with a repeatable process to test drive the code
By Luther Baker · #35553 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Searcher Object
All, I'll 2nd what Tim said, with this addition: Since this is a TDD forum (not a general testing forum) I'll assume you're asking how to determine what microtests to write in order to drive your
By Rob Myers · #35552 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Searcher Object
Thanks everyone for the feedback. Exactly what we needed for our conversation. On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Tim
By Eb Alson · #35551 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Searcher Object
How many ways are there for it to go right? I can see a null response, a single return, multiple returns. Can it get duplicates? What other results are "happy" paths? How many ways are there for it
By Tim Ottinger · #35550 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Searcher Object
Eb, Remember, the point of TDD is more to drive the design than to "test properly." That said, I wouldn't ever expect to test all permutations of something with a lot of permutations. I would check
By George Dinwiddie · #35549 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Searcher Object
Can you give us an example of a search? Or a few examples? Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 7:16 PM To: testdrivendevelopment Subject: [TDD] Testing Searcher
By Amir Kolsky · #35548 ·
Re: [TDD] Testing Searcher Object
Eikonne, I¡¯d probably start like this (and then let the code take me): - Set up a failing test which is an interesting combination of input categories - To get that passing, for
By Donaldson, John <john.m.donaldson@...> · #35547 ·
Testing Searcher Object
Hi - We were having a conversation about testing a "searcher" object. Basically, this object does a search based on the inputs passed into it. Do tests have to be written for every permutation of
By Eb Alson · #35546 ·
Re: [TDD] Unit testing in C++11
I haven't used or really looked at your framework ... yet ... but I did check it out a little on github. I like your choice in fluency syntax.
By Adam Miller <miller.adam.r@...> · #35545 ·
Re: [TDD] Re: Open Source Project Survey
?Simple, you post here, I see it, I ask you to write an article. You sit down and write it in 2-3 days. You win everlasting fame :-) Seriously some fairly good gigs over the years cite articles I
By Mark Levison <mark@...> · #35544 ·
Re: Open Source Project Survey
Hi, Mark - Keep up the fight, TDD needs some more high quality studies. Not sure where my research may fit in but if something interesting comes out of it I may send it your way :) Steven - A good
By fogarty_keith@... · #35543 ·
Re: [TDD] Open Source Project Survey
If you have access to the repo history, then the existence of unit test code and when they were first checked in relative to when the code they test was first checked in should give a handle on how
By Steve Gordon · #35542 ·
Re: [TDD] Open Source Project Survey
Keith - I've been chasing your namesake to publish a paper on InfoQ for 4yrs so I assume not. Perhaps you can take on his mantle. Here is an offer as you write your thesis if you happen to produce an
By Mark Levison <mark@...> · #35541 ·