¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Message test

 

Excuse me, I have not been recieving any messages from this
particular group. This is simply a test to find the hole in the pipe.


Re: Jim and Terri Hauff

John A. SOULE'
 

Jim,
I'm not sure how much height you have to work with, but a multi layer layout could work nicely. ( I sure wish I could have that kind of space) I rent a townhouse so I have built my n-scale layout in modular form. I worked from the NTRAK guidelines for heights & size- but I'm laying tracks where they want them (not very realist to me) ---> Anyways I've learned that layers work well in tight spaces, no matter what the scale... Although it sounds like you need to poke a hole in the wall and elevate the train so it travels around the house close to the ceilings.

-John Soule
Hampton, VA
coke4us@...



Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:29:42 -0000
From: lesh@...
Subject: Re: new guy

--- In small-layout-design@y..., "Jim and Terri Hauff" <JimH@t...>
wrote:
Hi everybody!

I'm new to the group, but this is an ideal topic for me. I am in
a unique situation: I have an 11' 7" X 20'4" for use for my model
railroad. Not a "small" size to most model railroaders. HOWEVER, I
model in 1:20.3 (F scale) and this puts me directly into the small
layout mode.

To equate it, if I was modeling in Nn3 I would have a space 17-
3/8" X 20-1/2" to work with. That includes the necessary aisleways,
a door, and workbench space. You see my problem.

So, any suggestions (other than obvious "change scales") would be
greatly appreciated. My interest is in logging and that helps. I'll
share things with the group as I figure this out and will lurk about
the group for a while.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Jim Hauff


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at


Re: Java in a closet

 

Mike
Not wanting to take up lots of space in the files area (it's 4
pages), or upset the "powers that be" at Railway Modeller, I've
emailed it direct to you. If it doesn't arrive pleases confirm your
off-group email address. Anyone else needing a copy please do
likewise.
Slainte
Jack (shortliner)


Re: Java in a closet

 

Shortliner,
I, for one, would be very interested in seeing the
article. I'm sure others in the group would find
great ideas there, also. I was reared in Hawaii- lots
of ng sugar haulers, even a standard guage line on the
Big Island until the tsunami of April, 1946. Have
mulled over a layout based on a timeline extension
(n-scale) for years...hmmm. Perhaps adding the
article to the groups file?
Mahalo,
Mike in Denver

-- chacmool@... wrote:
Whilst looking for something else (as usual) - I
came across an
article from a very old Railway Modeller about a
coffee table size
layout in TT on N scale chassis, vaguely Welsh NG
outline, but
probably adaptable. If it's any use I'll scan it
and email it
direct. Let me know if you want it
Shortliner


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.


Re: Java in a closet

 

Whilst looking for something else (as usual) - I came across an
article from a very old Railway Modeller about a coffee table size
layout in TT on N scale chassis, vaguely Welsh NG outline, but
probably adaptable. If it's any use I'll scan it and email it
direct. Let me know if you want it
Shortliner


Re: Java in a closet

 

--- In small-layout-design@y..., Jeff & Amanda Hatcher
<thehatchers@t...> wrote:


Hello Alan,
Imagine my surprise at seeing someone, ANYONE, interested in
modelling
a sugar plantation railway! I've been looking through the internet
for years
for
websites/layouts devoted to this industry. I recently came across
this site:
www.ZelmerOz.com/canesig which has the only photo I've seen of a
sugar cane
layout. Your idea of the TTz sounds like it has possibilities.
I've made too
many
palm trees in HO/OO to switch right now, but I would be interested
in taking
part
in any discussion group on the topic.
Fortunately out here in British Columbia, where practically every
exhibition
layout
features CP Rail through the Rockies, 009 is still an exotic scale!
I would be very interested in hearing any ideas on what makes for a
good
(small) plantation layout.
My friend and I are hoping to have something far enough along for
our big
show in November.
So far, all I've got are some palm trees, a corrugated iron
warehouse, lots
of photos and a space in
my closet 22" wide x 44"long x 15" high. Small indeed!
I would sure appreciate some "small minded" thoughts from you
folks at this
stage.
Given the above space, and my wish to exhibit this layout (so it
must be
portable), do I:
1) Keep the layout very small at 22"x44"
2) Create a layout that folds over on itself using some strong
hinges to
create a larger layout 22"x88"
3) The same as above except changing hinge sides so the layout is
44"x44"
I think each size has it's pros and cons.
What does the list think? How would your opinions differ if I did
it in
standard 00 gauge (like the idea in canesig)
vs 009?
Regards,
Jeff Hatcher


"Alan Jones" <alan@b...> wrote:
Subject: 00-z, TT-z, (TTe?)

The 4mm scale model railway is not normally thought of when Small
spaces are concerned, but I am thinking of new scales for small
spaces. 00-z could use Z scale track, and could model 18inch
prototypes quite easily. better still would be TT-z (3mm/foot on Z
scale track. This would be ideal for 2foot prototypes in almost
half
the space of 009. I'm planning to develop this scale for my model
of
a Javanese Sugar plantation, which needs 0-10-0 and 0-8-0 locos,
and
quite conveniently, Marklin make Z scale models of Large german
Locos
making chassis readily available.

Perhaps if interest grows in TT-z and TT9 (3mmscale, 3foot
prototypes)
I could start a group.

If your in Porthmadog this weekend, I've got my 005 models on
display
(0-4-4-0 Mallet)

Jeff/Alan

I live in Australia which still has cane railways on the east coast
in Queensland. A quick search of www.altavista.com.au using the
search string "cane railway" returned 30 sites, I did not check them
all out but there is a lot of information there. I also recall that
Continental Modeller did an article on the cane railways in
Queensland a few years ago, try contacting them for a backcopy, it
was a good article containing line drawings of steam and diesel
locos, rolling stock, photos and track diagrams. If you have no luck
with them, give me am E-mail, I'm sure that I still have the magazine
somewhere in my "dungeon" (don't like to throw them away).

Regards,

Les Hardy


Re: new guy

 

--- In small-layout-design@y..., "Jim and Terri Hauff" <JimH@t...>
wrote:
Hi everybody!

I'm new to the group, but this is an ideal topic for me. I am in
a unique situation: I have an 11' 7" X 20'4" for use for my model
railroad. Not a "small" size to most model railroaders. HOWEVER, I
model in 1:20.3 (F scale) and this puts me directly into the small
layout mode.

To equate it, if I was modeling in Nn3 I would have a space 17-
3/8" X 20-1/2" to work with. That includes the necessary aisleways,
a door, and workbench space. You see my problem.

So, any suggestions (other than obvious "change scales") would be
greatly appreciated. My interest is in logging and that helps. I'll
share things with the group as I figure this out and will lurk about
the group for a while.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Jim Hauff


Jim,

I'm new to this group too, living in a small two bedroom flat
(appartment) I know what you mean about the space. However there is a
article I recalled from Model Railroad Planning 1998 entitled "Soda
Creek & South Park Revisited" by Tony Koester. Basically it is an
update of an aticle published by Malcom Furlow in the October 1986
edition of Model Railroader of a Gn3 layout for a 10x12 room, the
plan includes a continuous run, terminal, wye, branch and hidden
staging. I think it could easily be modified for logging, terminal =
sawmill, branch = log camp, there's even a spur for an industry. If
you cannot locate a copy easily I can scan and forward to you if
you're interested (provided no one objects to the copyright!)

Regards,

Les Hardy


Re: Lost in America

David Cooke
 

A Shortline is a Railroad that only has a short amount of trackage
A Mikado is a 2-8-2.
David Cooke.


Re: Lost in America

Peter Barrett
 

Alan Jones wrote:

hi,
Could someone please explain to me what some American terms mean:

1. Shortline
Typically a small independant railroad, as opposed to a 'class 1' main
railroad, or a branchline of a class 1 railroad. Early shortlines
connected resource deposits or small outlying towns to larger
railroads. More recently, shortlines have been formed from abandoned or
cast off branch lines from mergers.

2. Mikado
A steam engine of 2-8-2 wheel arrangement.

Hope this helps!

Peter


Lost in America

Alan Jones
 

hi,
Could someone please explain to me what some American terms mean:

1. Shortline
2. Mikado

I dont get very far out of Wales to know what they are - Ive managed
to work out what a switch is, and a Tie!


Re : New Guy

 

A site of possible interest for Jim is www.trainweb.org/lazyacre/ a
1:20.3 "logger" who got thrown out of his own back yard!
shortliner.


Re : New Guy

 

Welcome to the list - another "spatially challenged" modeller!
Garden Railways Feb 2000 had an article entitled Yosemite Valley
Line that may help you - it isn't a "logger" but might be adaptable.
If you don't have a copy I can scan it
Jack (shortliner)


Re: new guy

 

Hi Jim,

Your comparing your 11'7"x20'4" space in scale F with the equivalent
17-3/8"x20-1/2" in Nn3. This is all mathematically correct, but from
the eye of the viewer it is not. When you build a room full in a
large scale like F or II (1:22.5), you're really engulfed in the
scenery. You're standing in the middle of it, assuming a along-the-
wall layout. You cannot get a complete overview of the complete
layout. With the N (1:160) equivalent you can see all of the layout
in one glance. The viewer senses the overall proportions much better.

This means for you as a large scale modeller that you have more
possibilities. You can use smaller radii and shorter tracks as you
could do in Nn3. With large scale models it just doesn't look that
ridiculous. A 2' curve might look spacious, but it's 3" N-scale
equivalent looks bizarre. It's all in the eye of the beholder.

Take advantage of this psychological effect when planning.

Best regards,

Reinoud Kaasschieter


Re: new guy

Jim and Terri Hauff
 

Hi Peter - thanks for the response. I'm running one of the Bachmann Shays as my primary motive power. It's dimensions are 5"w X 22"l - minimum radius will likely be about 30". My (scratchbuilt) log cars are 12" each (20' scale length- based on Michigan-Cal cars). I'm currently experimenting with a single main that runs around the perimeter of the room and ends in a second shelf over the lower layout table. The log loading side would be on that upper shelf. This would allow me about 70' (give or take) of mainline - about 1/4 mile in Fn3. At the low end would be some kind of a transfer site to standard gauge cars, a simple shop, and loco servicing facilities. The std gauge would run offline and be the interchange.
Last night I found a small diagram drawing of Ely-Thomas' rather simple operation in West Virginia which would be well-suited to this design. I'd have to bridge the doorway, but a 32" bridge in large scale is under 60' in length.

So if any of smaller scale guys think you have it bad, try designing an Nn3 logging layout to fit inside a 17' X 20" box, with proportioned aisle room, and room for a work bench. It'll make your head swim and give you a new appreciation for the work "compromise".

However, I greatly appreciate all input or references or anything else I can get. I'd like to get as much logging operation into this thing as I can.

Thanks very much!

Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Barrett
To: small-layout-design@...
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [small-layout-design] new guy


Jim and Terri Hauff wrote:
>
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm new to the group, but this is an ideal topic for me. I am in a unique situation: I have an 11' 7" X 20'4" for use for my model railroad. Not a "small" size to most model railroaders. HOWEVER, I model in 1:20.3 (F scale) and this puts me directly into the small layout mode.

Hey Jim. Is this the *entire* space, or is there room for a narrow
staging shelf or a drop leaf along another wall? Do you have a sketch
of the space?

If my math is correct, this equates to about 2'x4.5' in HOn3. Wow.
That's not even room to turn around in.

Out of curiousity, what are the pertinant dimensions in F? Engine and
car length, parallel track clearance, useable radii?

> So, any suggestions (other than obvious "change scales") would be greatly appreciated. My interest is in logging and that helps. I'll share things with the group as I figure this out and will lurk about the group for a while.

An idea that pops into my head is a mini terminal next to a sawmill.
Have a turntable with two lead tracks that join in a wye for a
runaround, and then a spur or two to the sawmill or to store cars. If
you can have a drop leaf for staging, you can feed the terminal trains
from there. Maybe skip the sawmill and have a car repair shop?

Man. I'd kill for a 11x20' space. :)

Peter

____________________________________

Small Layout Design Discussion Group




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: new guy

Peter Barrett
 

Jim and Terri Hauff wrote:

Hi everybody!

I'm new to the group, but this is an ideal topic for me. I am in a unique situation: I have an 11' 7" X 20'4" for use for my model railroad. Not a "small" size to most model railroaders. HOWEVER, I model in 1:20.3 (F scale) and this puts me directly into the small layout mode.
Hey Jim. Is this the *entire* space, or is there room for a narrow
staging shelf or a drop leaf along another wall? Do you have a sketch
of the space?

If my math is correct, this equates to about 2'x4.5' in HOn3. Wow.
That's not even room to turn around in.

Out of curiousity, what are the pertinant dimensions in F? Engine and
car length, parallel track clearance, useable radii?

So, any suggestions (other than obvious "change scales") would be greatly appreciated. My interest is in logging and that helps. I'll share things with the group as I figure this out and will lurk about the group for a while.
An idea that pops into my head is a mini terminal next to a sawmill.
Have a turntable with two lead tracks that join in a wye for a
runaround, and then a spur or two to the sawmill or to store cars. If
you can have a drop leaf for staging, you can feed the terminal trains
from there. Maybe skip the sawmill and have a car repair shop?

Man. I'd kill for a 11x20' space. :)

Peter


new guy

Jim and Terri Hauff
 

Hi everybody!

I'm new to the group, but this is an ideal topic for me. I am in a unique situation: I have an 11' 7" X 20'4" for use for my model railroad. Not a "small" size to most model railroaders. HOWEVER, I model in 1:20.3 (F scale) and this puts me directly into the small layout mode.

To equate it, if I was modeling in Nn3 I would have a space 17-3/8" X 20-1/2" to work with. That includes the necessary aisleways, a door, and workbench space. You see my problem.

So, any suggestions (other than obvious "change scales") would be greatly appreciated. My interest is in logging and that helps. I'll share things with the group as I figure this out and will lurk about the group for a while.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Jim Hauff


Re: Donovans GSW plan

Donovan Jr.
 

Thanks for the tips, hows the article?

DF

--- chacmool@... wrote:
Hi Donovan - now we're cookin'! But I'd make thje
right-hand road
crossing a bridge, just for variety. It might also
be worth tahing
one of the two right-hand sidings across the
potential addition with
a crosssing into a "gated" yard when you build it.
It needn't go
anywhere but adds to scenic interest.
Jack (shortliner)


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger


Donovans GSW plan

 

Hi Donovan - now we're cookin'! But I'd make thje right-hand road
crossing a bridge, just for variety. It might also be worth tahing
one of the two right-hand sidings across the potential addition with
a crosssing into a "gated" yard when you build it. It needn't go
anywhere but adds to scenic interest.
Jack (shortliner)


Sugar cane RR's

 

Thanks Doug
Foldingham featured in issues 24 & 25, both available as back numbers.
Jack (shortliner)
www.ModelTrainsInternational.co.uk


SugarCane RR's

 

Thanks Doug
Foldingham was featured in Issues 24 & 25.
Jack (shortliner)
www.Modek TrainsInternational.co.uk