Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
New at building a repeater
Norman Dyck <[email protected]
Hi
I am looking in to building a repeater. I have a Motorola Mitrek and have seen some articles on using a single radio to build a repeater but the instructions are not very clear. The Mitrek that I have is all setup and working, I am now using it as a voice radio to talk to only one repeater. It is just the setting up the radio as a repeater and the connections for the controller and things like that. I am also looking for a controller and it has to be inexpensive. I don't need phone patch, or voice ID, but will need to have at least two radio ports and will need the manuals also. Another thing that I am looking for are duplexers but for now will not need them. If anyone can help let me know and where to get more information. Thanks Norm VE5VY |
Mike Hamann
Norm,
Here are some internet sites regarding repeater mods to Motorola and GE radios: and some good controllers at: 73, Mike, WB6CSH From: Norman Dyck <n.dyck@...>Mitrek and have seen some articles on using a single radio to build arepeater but the instructions are not very clear. The Mitrek that I haveis all setup and working, I am now using it as a voice radio to talk toonly one repeater. It is just the setting up the radio as a repeaterand the connections for the controller and things like that. I amalso looking for a controller and it has to be inexpensive. I don't needphone patch, or voice ID, but will need to have at least two radio portsand will need the manuals also. Another thing that I am looking forare duplexers but for now will not need them.information.
|
Walter Isaacson
HiDon't know about any articles but I've used a few Mitreks in our repeater network. I've found the low band UHF Mitrks relatively easy to obtain and we've used a few as linking radios in the Wild Rose Network. The radios were originally on 413 Mhz or there abouts and I've been able to tune them up on 440 Mhz. What I've been doing is chopping out the UHF connector thats on front of the radio. The connector body contains the antenna relay. Going into the connector body is 2 teflon covered co-axs. I've been cutting off the connector body. I drill a couple of holes in the side of the radio just big enough to pass the co-ax keepng as much separation between the 2 co-axs. I put BNC female connectors on the pig tails coming out of the radio (my cheat to keep separation between receive and transmit.signals). I don't have the Motorola manuals handy but there is a diode on the interface printed circuit board right at the left end when looking at the radio from the front that has to be removed. That permits the receiver to work when the transmitter is keyed. Also a transistor that supplies keyed 9 volts for the receive crystal oscillator is removed and a jumper is placed in its place from emitter to collector. This makes sure the receive crystal oscillator is running continuously. There is a 560 ohm resistor on the microphone input that supplies bias voltage for the amplified microphone that I remove. I don't use the harness / control head but jumper connections behind the system plug to strap channel 1 plus the ignition wire. I attach my battery leads directly to pins 17 and 19 on the system plug.. I make up a little interface board that goes inside the radio and mount a DB9 connector to the side of the radio. The board has an op amp such as an LM324 and an analog gate (4066). I pick up the squelch signal (across a 150 ohm resistor thats on the emitter of the squelch transistor that switches squelch to the 2 audio power I.C.s. and feed it into one op amp wired as a comparator to generate the COS signal. I pick up discriminator audio and feed it into another op amp circuit set up to give about a gain of 10. I use the COS signal to control one of the gates in the 4066 which gates the discriminator audio. I wire the gated receive audio, COS, microphone audio and PTT into the DB9 connector. I wire the DB9 to mate to Link-Com RLC-1. (actually the DB9 connector is common to all of the Link-Com controllers. We use the Link-Com controllers extensively in our network. The RLC-1 is the simplest controller that Link-Com offers. It has 2 ports that can be used as 1 repeater and full duplex linking port or 2 repeater ports. It has no voice or phone patch but has 4 analog telemetry channels. The RLC-1 is very low current (typically 36 ma) and seems to stand up to the harsh enviroment of mountain top repeater sites. We use the RLC-1 controllers to monitor voltages and temperatures of our mountain top repeater sites. The Mitreks are a bit of a current hog for solar powered repeater sites (260 ma standby current, reducing to about 200 ma when the 2 audio output I.C.s are removed) but otherwise work well. Once the radio has been converted and hooked up to the controller it can be changed from a full duplex link radio to a repeater just by bashing in the appropriate DTMF commands to the radio. The RLC-1 does have a serial data port on it. I've re-programmed a few RLC-1s at the mountaintop repeater sites by packing up a lap-top computer with me and re- programming the controller on the spot. We standarised on the Link-Com controllers but I am sure there are other simple controllers that can be used in your aplication. Walter VE6ANI Wild Rose Network HOME PAGE |
Randy Nelson
We use the Link-Com controllers extensively in our network. The RLC-1 isWalter, I am in the process of using a Mitrek and an RLC-1. It sounds like your using CSQ on the repeater. Have you tried using the Mitrek PL board with the RLC-1 on any other repeaters? I have heard the Mitrek squelch circuit is terrible. Guess I'll have to see for myself. 73's, Randy, WB0VHB |
Joe Orrico WB6HRO
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Nelson <rnelson@...> To: Repeater-builder@... <Repeater-builder@...> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 6:33 PM Subject: [Repeater-builder] Re: New at building a repeater From: Randy Nelson <rnelson@...> We use the Link-Com controllers extensively in our network. The RLC-1 isused as 1 repeater and full duplex linking port or 2 repeater ports. It has novoice or Walter, I am in the process of using a Mitrek and an RLC-1. It sounds like your using CSQ on the repeater. Have you tried using the Mitrek PL board with the RLC-1 on any other repeaters? The Com Spec TS-32 works fine and easier to find. I have heard the Mitrek squelch circuit is terrible. Guess I'll have to see for myself. We have been using Mitreks for UHF links, and I just epoxy a 25K, 10 turn pot on the outside of the front Motorola plug shell. Squelch works fine. de Joe WB6HRO 73's, Randy, WB0VHB ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Looking for the perfect gift for a friend? Tell them about ONElist's 115,000 free e-mail communities! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by the owners and users of "RBTIP" |
Walter Isaacson
We use TS-32 tone boards on our repeaters. So far we haven't been using CCTCS on our links, just on our drop repeaters. We use 100 Hz encode and decode on our network repeaters. Some of our stand-alone repeaters use various tones. I haven't figured out how to make the Mitrek boards encode and decode at the same time. The squelch on the Mitrek radios isn't so hot, long squelch tails. Link-Com offers a Motorola Squelch/cos board that can be added to just about any fm radio. That board has the double squelch system, instant squelch release on strong signals and a squelch that follows weak signals right into the noise. We've used that board on some of our repeaters. That board connects right to the discriminator output in the radio. Big improvement over the stock Mitrek squelch. Walter VE6ANI Home Page |
Kevin K. Custer W3KKC
Walter Isaacson wrote:
From: "Walter Isaacson" <isaacow@...> Here also is information on building a quality squelch system for the Mitrek radio. Kevin |
Walter Isaacson
Thanks. Some 8 years ago or so I was trying to come up with a better squelch/COS board. I breadboarded some circuits but wasn't happy with the results. I sure tried to get my hands on one of those Motorola squelch IC's, M7716/M6709 but none of the suppliers in the Calgary area could help me. Eventually we cheated. One member of our group ended up buying an ex- RCMP Micor 100 watt repeater and that repeater is our main repeater here in Calgary. A rather expensive way to solve our squelch problem. <grin> I just checked Link-Comm's page to see if they still carried that squelch/COS board but I didn't see it on their page. For those that would like to check Link-Comm's page themselves its Walter VE6ANI Home Page: |
mch
Walter Isaacson wrote:
That's odd. I've always used In any case, not to take anything away from Link Comm, but why not spend 50 bucks on an audio delay board from S*Com? Strong signal or weak - no squelch crash. :) From what I recall, the RLC-SQL was (is) more than that and only reduces the crash on strong signals. Joe, KR3P |
Walter Isaacson
That's odd. I've always usedThats what I have in my bookimarks. It puts you directly on their catalog page. Mind you that bookmark is 3 years old. We use the RLC audio delay boards. The audio delay boards doesn't address the problem of weak and fluttery signals. So far we use the audio delay boards here in Calgary. We use them on our RLC-2A. We also use a few RLC-4s Walter VE6ANI Home Page: |
Brent DeSalvo KF4TNP
Same Hear , not to take anything from anybody but i have found the NHRC DAD to
work well take a look at Walter Isaacson wrote: From: "Walter Isaacson" <isaacow@...>--That's odd. I've always usedThats what I have in my bookimarks. It puts you directly on their catalog Brent DeSalvo (KF4TNP) Grid Square: EM65 ICQ UIN# : 17430698 Mailto:bug1@... |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss