¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
At 5/22/2025 07:55 PM, you wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:47 PM, Chris Boone WB5ITT wrote: Uhhh beacon IDing, etc is illegal under part97..several repeaters have gotten emails from Riley about it.
By Bob Dengler · #215484 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
I like em round myself (TARRA) via groups.io <tarra@...> wrote:
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215483 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What is your callsign?? You seem to hiding something...as to Beacons, any amateur station keying up periodically and transmitting information (ID, TIME< Telemetry, etc) is a BEACON..GO ask Laura Smith
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215482 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Excuse me BUT what do you call an autopatch or a manual phone patch on HF? How about letting a non amateur talk on your station? THATS 3RD Party... IT has been for decades.....You didn't look deep
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215481 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What about Linux???? [email protected]> wrote:
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215480 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Ken, you forgot the important part WHEN a repeater is beaconing ID every 10min, hour, whatever, since it is NOT in the AUTO BEACON subband, it MUST be monitored by a CONTROL OP as required by Part 97
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215479 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
A repeater is ONLY a repeater when it is repeating...otherwise it is a amateur station falling under other rules...this is why a REPEATER in Autopatch mode is NOT a repeater but a full duplex base
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215478 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Thats an easy one. PI 5 for the win.
By Kory Oldham W4RZ · #215477 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What about a Pi? Which is better, the 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5? Mick - W7CAT
By Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA) · #215476 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Beacon: Part 97 - Page 5 - section 9 defines "Beacon" as: An amateur station transmitting communications for the purposes of observation of propagation and reception or other related experimental
By digitalradiohacker · #215475 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Chris, Page 8 section 47of Part 97 defines "Third party communications" as: A message from the control operator (first party) of an amateur station to another amateur station control operator (second
By digitalradiohacker · #215474 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
hahahahaha
By Kory Oldham W4RZ · #215473 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
For giggles, I had to see what ChatGPT had to say about it (I'm certainly not calling this a qualified source and I've caught ChatGPT in errors before). In the United States, beaconing an ID on an
By Ken Arck AH6LE · #215472 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
No it is not. It is a licensed repeater, identifying per regulations. Just because you don¡¯t agree changes nothing. If ALL it did was identify, without ever passing other traffic you would be
By Tom Cole · #215471 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Can we discuss PC vs MAC next?
By Ken Arck AH6LE · #215470 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
[email protected]> wrote: ? ? ? Tom you need to read part 97 and take your license test again... the only time the repeaters required to ID is when it's in use!
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215469 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
No it's not allowed....ask Riley or Laura Smith.. When a station is not repeating another station, it falls under other rules. This is the same thing as when it's in Auto patch mode, it's no longer a
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215468 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
That was my point. It is not prohibited, so therefore is allowed. In fact, one could ID every 5 minutes and be legal.
By Tom Cole · #215467 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
I wonder if someone can walk me through this? I'm based in the UK, and our rules are ging to be different. For example, the only rule that I think would apply here is "unattended operation". For
By digitalradiohacker · #215466 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
The SLR does...via the GPIO pins..I opened an archive I have for a SLR8000 and set GPIO 2 to low going, debounce and TX PL Inhibit....it should work once written into the cpg..I don't have a SLR8000
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215465 ·